The effect of distance on short-term outcomes in a regionalized, publicly funded bariatric surgery model
- 78 Downloads
While high-volume Centers of Excellence (COE) for bariatric surgery may have improved clinical outcomes, their disparate distribution results in longer travel distances for patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of distance from COE on outcomes and readmission.
This was a retrospective study of all adults, aged 18 years or older, receiving bariatric surgery from April 2009 to March 2012 in the province of Ontario. Main outcomes included 30-day complication rates and readmission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of distance from patients’ primary residence to their bariatric COE on patient outcomes and readmissions.
Five thousand and seven patients were identified, two-thirds residing within 100 km of a COE with a mean distance of 117.2 km. The majority of patients did not reside within a Local Integrated Health Network (LHIN) that contained a COE, while 18.3% of patients lived in rural areas. Using multivariable adjustment, for every 10 km increase from the COE where surgery was performed, the Odds Ratio (OR) for complications was 1.00 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.99–1.01; P = 0.747]. Additionally, both residing in a LHIN without a COE, OR 1.10 (95% CI 0.87–1.40; P = 0.434), and rural status, OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.77–1.23; P = 0.821) showed no increase in risk of complication. Similarly, further distances did not influence rate of readmission, OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.98–1.00; P = 0.077) nor did rural status OR 1.31 (95% CI 0.97–1.76; P = 0.076).
The COE model, where a few centers in high population areas service a large geographic region, is adequate in ensuring patients that live further away receive appropriate short-term care.
KeywordsBariatric surgery Distance Regionalization Outcomes Complications
Compliance with ethical standards
Drs. Aristithes Doumouras, Fady Saleh, Dennis Hong have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 22.Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium, Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, Wahed AS, Berk P, Chapman W, Pories W, Courcoulas A, McCloskey C, Mitchell J, Patterson E, Pomp A, Staten MA, Yanovski SZ, Thirlby R, Wolfe B (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361:445–454. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0901836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Flum DR, Kwon S, MacLeod K, Wang B, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Garrison LP, Sullivan SD, Bariatric Obesity Outcome Modeling Collaborative (2011) The use, safety and cost of bariatric surgery before and after Medicareʼs national coverage decision. Ann Surg 254:860–865. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822f2101 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Simunovic M, Urbach D, Major D, Sutradhar R, Baxter N, To T, Brown A, Davis D, Levine MN (2010) Assessing the volume-outcome hypothesis and region-level quality improvement interventions: pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian Provinces. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2537–2544. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1114-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Doumouras AG, Saleh F, Tarride J-E, Hong D (2016) A population-based analysis of the drivers of short-term costs after bariatric surgery within a publicly funded regionalized center of excellence system. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Canadian Institute for Health Information (2011) Data quality documentation, hospital morbidity database, 2010–2011—executive summary. CIHI, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- 37.Canadian Institute for Health Information (2009) Data quality documentation, discharge abstract database, 2008–2009—executive summary. CIHI, OttawaGoogle Scholar