With widespread adoption of MIS colectomy for colon cancer, does hospital type matter?
Recent studies have shown that hospital type impacts patient outcomes, but no studies have examined hospital differences in outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for segmental colectomies.
The 2010–2014 National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients undergoing segmental colectomy for non-metastatic colon adenocarcinoma. Descriptive statistics characterized MIS utilization by hospital type. Multivariable models were used to examine the effect of hospital type on outcomes after MIS. Survival probability was plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method.
80,922 patients underwent MIS segmental colectomy for colon cancer from 2010 to 2014. From 2010 to 2014, the number of MIS segmental colectomies increased by 157% at academic hospitals, 151% at comprehensive hospitals, and 153% at community hospitals. Compared to academic hospitals, community and comprehensive hospitals had greater adjusted odds of positive margins (Community OR 1.525, 95% Confidence Interval 1.233–1.885; Comprehensive OR 1.216, 95% CI 1.041–1.42), incomplete number of lymph nodes analyzed (< 12 LNs) from surgery (Community OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.98–2.32; Comprehensive OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.34–1.51), and greater 30-day mortality (Community OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14–1.78; Comprehensive OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.17–1.59). Patient survival probability was higher at academic hospitals at 5 years (Academic 69% vs. Comprehensive 66% vs. Community 63%, p < 0.001). Community hospitals and comprehensive hospitals had significantly higher risk of adjusted long-term mortality (Community HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.19–1.37; p < 0.001; Comprehensive HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09–1.20; p < 0.001).
Despite widespread use of laparoscopic oncologic surgery, short- and long-term outcomes from MIS for segmental colectomy are superior at academic hospitals. This difference may be due to superior perioperative oncologic technique and surgical outcomes at academic hospitals. Our data provide important information for patients, referring physicians, and surgeons about the significance of hospital type in management of colon cancer.
KeywordsHospital type Colorectal Malignancy Resection Outcomes
Compliance with ethical standards
Kyle Freischlag, Mohamed Adam, Megan Turner, Brain Ezekian, Joshua Watson, Paul M. Schroder, Christopher Mantyh, and John Migaly have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 2.Holder-Murray J, Dozois EJ (2011) Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: past, present, and future. Int J Surg Oncol 2011:490917Google Scholar
- 3.Fowler DL, White SA (1991) Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):183–188Google Scholar
- 4.Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150Google Scholar
- 14.Schwenk W et al (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003145Google Scholar
- 25.Fong Y et al (2005) Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 242(4):540–544 (Discussion 544–547)Google Scholar
- 30.American College of Surgeons. National Cancer Data Base. [cited 2016 March 19]; Available from https://www.facs.org/quality%20programs/cancer/ncdb
- 32.American College of Surgeons. National Cancer Data Base—Data Dictionary PUF 2015 (2017) [cited 2018 4/1/2018]; Available from http://ncdbpuf.facs.org/node/259?q=print-pdf-all
- 35.(NCDB), N.C.D.B. Hospital Type or Health Care System. 2016; Available from http://oliver.facs.org/BMPub/help/hcr_09_hosp_typesys.cfm
- 41.Birch DW, Misra M, Farrokhyar F (2007) The feasibility of introducing advanced minimally invasive surgery into surgical practice. Can J Surg 50(4):256–260Google Scholar
- 44.Buurma M et al (2015) Influence of individual surgeon volume on oncological outcome of colorectal cancer surgery. Int J Surg Oncol 2015:464570Google Scholar
- 61.Nagendran M et al (2013) Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD006575Google Scholar