Nodal upstaging evaluation in NSCLC patients treated by robotic lobectomy
- 144 Downloads
Open pulmonary resection is considered the gold standard treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in the last decades, the use of minimal-invasive techniques has given promising results. Survival in lung cancer, after surgery, depends on the number of pathological nodes (pN), thus lymph nodal upstaging can be considered a surrogate for surgical quality of the procedure. Several studies have demonstrated a lower rate of upstaging in video-assisted thoracic surgery than in open surgery, suggesting an approach-related difference in lymphadenectomy. Features of robotic technique could consent a lymph nodal dissection similar to open surgery. The aim of the study is to compare nodal upstaging between thoracotomy and robotic approaches to evaluate the oncologic radicality.
Between January 2013 and December 2016, 212 consecutive cN0 NSCLC patients underwent lobectomy and lymphadenectomy (N1 + N2 stations) by either thoracotomy (Open Group) or robotic surgery (Robotic Group).
Lobectomy and lymphadenectomy were performed in 106 cN0–cN1 NSCLC patients by robotic surgery and in 106 cN0–cN1 NSCLC patients by open surgery. A mean of 14.42 ± 6.99 lymph nodes was removed in the Robotic Group (RG) and a mean of 14.32 ± 7.34 nodes in the Open Group (OG). Nodal upstaging was observed in 22 (20.75%) RG patients and in 19 OG (17.92%) patients.
Robotic lobectomy for clinical N0–N1 NSCLC appears to be equivalent to thoracotomy in terms of efficacy of lymph node dissection and nodal upstaging. Given that the nodal upstaging is a surrogate of quality of surgery, we can consider robotic lobectomy an appropriate procedure which ensures similar result to the open approach.
KeywordsRobotic surgery Lobectomy Lymph nodes Nodal upstaging NSCLC
Thanks to Teresa Hung Key for proofreading.
Compliance with ethical standards
Dr C. Zirafa, Dr V. Aprile, Dr S. Ricciardi, Dr G. Romano, Dr F. Davini, Dr I. Cavaliere, Dr G. Alì, Prof. G. Fontanini, and Prof. Franca Melfi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Asamura H, Chansky K, Crowley J, Goldstraw P, Rusch VW, Vansteenkiste JF, Watanabe H, Wu YL, Zielinski M, Ball D, Rami-Porta R, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Advisory Board Members, and Participating Institutions (2015) The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the N descriptors in the forthcoming 8th edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 10(12):1675–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Medbery RL, Gillespie TW, Liu Y, Nickleach DC, Lipscomb J, Sancheti MS, Pickens A, Force SD, Fernandez FG (2016) Nodal upstaging is more common with thoracotomy than with VATS during lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: an analysis from the National Cancer data base. J Thorac Oncol 11(2):222–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Yang CF, Sun Z, Speicher PJ, Saud SM, Gulack BC, Hartwig MG, Harpole DH Jr, Onaitis MW, Tong BC, D’Amico TA, Berry MF (2016) Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3):1037–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Silvestri GA, Gonzalez AV, Jantz MA, Margolis ML, Gould MK, Tanoue LT, Harris LJ, Detterbeck FC (2013) Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143(5 Suppl):e211S–e250SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.De Leyn P, Dooms C, Kuzdzal J, Lardinois D, Passlick B, Rami-Porta R, Turna A, Van Schil P, Venuta F, Waller D, Weder W, Zielinski M (2014) Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 45(5):787–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, Yan TD (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1(1):3–10Google Scholar