Impact of one-to-one tutoring on fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) passing rate in a single center experience outside the United States: a randomized controlled trial
Outside the US, FLS certification is not required and its teaching methods are not well standardized. Even if the FLS was designed as “stand alone” training system, most of Academic Institution offer support to residents during training. We present the first systematic application of FLS in Italy.
Our aim was to evaluate the role of mentoring/coaching on FLS training in terms of the passing rate and global performance in the search for resource optimization.
Sixty residents in general surgery, obstetrics & gynecology, and urology were selected to be enrolled in a randomized controlled trial, practicing FLS with the goal of passing a simulated final exam. The control group practiced exclusively with video material from SAGES, whereas the interventional group was supported by a mentor.
Forty-six subjects met the requirements and completed the trial. For the other 14 subjects no results are available for comparison. One subject for each group failed the exam, resulting in a passing rate of 95.7%, with no obvious differences between groups. Subgroup analysis did not reveal any difference between the groups for FLS tasks.
We confirm that methods other than video instruction and deliberate FLS practice are not essential to pass the final exam. Based on these results, we suggest the introduction of the FLS system even where a trained tutor is not available. This trial is the first single institution application of the FLS in Italy and one of the few experiences outside the US.
Trial Number: NCT02486575 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
KeywordsLaparoscopy FLS Training Randomized trial Tutoring Italy
The authors are grateful to all the residents who participated in this TRIAL. We would like to express sincere gratitude to Luisa Ciullo, Director of the administrative operations at our Institution, for the coordination and the logistic support.
Compliance with ethical standards
Federico Gheza, Paolo Raimondi, Leonardo Solaini, Federico Coccolini, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Nazario Portolani, and GuidoAlberto Massimo Tiberio have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 10.Esposito C, Escolino M, Saxena A, Montupet P, Chiarenza F, De Agustin J, Draghici IM, Cerulo M, Sagaon MM, Di Benedetto V, Gamba P, Settimi A, Najmaldin A (2015) European Society of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgeons (ESPES) guidelines for training program in pediatric minimally invasive surgery. Pediatr Surg Int 31(4):367–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Placek SB, Franklin BR, Haviland SM, Wagner MD, O’Donnell MT, Cryer CT, Trinca KD, Silverman E, Matthew Ritter E (2017) Outcomes of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) mastery training standards applied to an ergonomically different, lower cost platform. Surg Endosc 31:2616–2622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Franklin BR, Placek SB, Wagner MD, Haviland SM, O’Donnell MT, Ritter EM (2017) Cost comparison of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training completed with standard fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery equipment versus low-cost equipment. J Surg Educ 74:459–465Google Scholar
- 22.Kolozsvari NO, Kaneva P, Brace C, Chartrand G, Vaillancourt M, Cao J, Banaszek D, Demyttenaere S, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2011) Mastery versus the standard proficiency target for basic laparoscopic skill training: effect on skill transfer and retention. Surg Endosc 25:2063–2070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar