Learning curve for performing choledochotomy bile duct exploration with primary closure after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Primary closure after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a safe and effective approach for treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve of performing primary closure after LC+LCBDE.

Methods

We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent primary closure after LC+LCBDE performed by a single surgeon from January 2009 to April 2015 in our institution, and analyzed preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis to evaluate the learning curve for this procedure.

Results

Overall, there were 390 patients. The total postoperative complications rate was 7.2%, including bile leakage in 9 (2.3%) patients and retained common bile duct stone in 3 (0.8%) patients. The CUSUM operating time (OT) learning curve was best modeled by the equation: CUSUMOT = 312.209 × procedure0.599 × e(−0.011×procedure) + 122.608 (R2 = 0.96). The learning curve was composed of two phases, phase 1 (the initial 54 patients) and phase 2 (the remaining 336 patients). A significant decrease in the OT (116.8 ± 22.4 vs. 93.8 ± 17.8 min; p < 0.001) and complication rate (16.7 vs. 5.7%; p < 0.01) including the rate of bile leakage (7.4 vs. 1.5%; p < 0.01) and retained stone (3.7 vs. 0.3%; p < 0.01) was observed between the two phases. In addition, 20 patients had conversion to open surgery. Impacted stones were independently associated with conversion, as indicated by a multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

The data suggest that the learning curve of this procedure was achieved in approximately 54 cases. An impacted stone was the only risk factor that affected the conversion rate.

Keywords

Learning curve Cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Common bile duct exploration Primary closure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81760435), the Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (20161BBI90016), and the Advantage Innovation Team of Jiangxi Province (20153BCB24004).

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Hengqing Zhu, Linquan Wu, Rongfa Yuan, Yu Wang, Wenjun Liao, Jun Lei, and Jianghua Shao have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M (2008) Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 57:1004–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.121657 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ponsky JL, Heniford BT, Gersin K (2000) Choledocholithiasis: evolving intraoperative strategies. Am Surg 66:262–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frossard JL, Morel PM (2010) Detection and management of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 72:808–816.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baillie J, Testoni PA (2016) Same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ERCP for choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 84:646–648.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.05.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L, Peres L, Sueth D (2008) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 247:674–679.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181612c85 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wandling MW, Hungness ES, Pavey ES, Stulberg JJ, Schwab B, Yang AD, Shapiro MB, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Nathens AB (2016) Nationwide assessment of trends in choledocholithiasis management in the United States from 1998 to 2013. JAMA Surg 151:1125–1130.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2059 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quaresima S, Balla A, Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, Lezoche E, Paganini AM (2017) A 23 year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. HPB 19(1):29–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.10.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mattila A, Luhtala J, Mrena J, Kautiainen H, Kellokumpu I (2014) An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland. Surg Endosc 28:3451–3457.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3620-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Geidie AA (2010) Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 14:844–848.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1133-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Wu GZ, Li JM, Dong ZT, Mo XD (2009) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Res 157:e1–e5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu X, Yang Y, Dong P, Gu J, Lu J, Li M, Mu J, Wu W, Yang J, Zhang L, Ding Q, Liu Y (2012) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 397:909–916.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0962-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu QD, Tao CL, Zhou MT, Yu ZP, Shi HQ, Zhang QY (2011) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 396:53–62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0660-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Estellés VN, Domingo DPC, Peris TN, Díez AJÁ, Vázquez TA, Blanes MF (2016) Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 30:1975–1982.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4424-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keeling NJ, Menzies D, Motson RW (1999) Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: beyond the learning curve. Surg Endosc 13(2):109–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khaled YS, Malde DJ, de Souza C, Kalia A, Ammori BJ (2013) Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 27:4164–4170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3015-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hua J, Lin S, Qian D, He Z, Zhang T, Song Z (2015) Primary closure and rate of bile leak following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy. Dig Surg 32:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000368326 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chan DS, Jain PA, Khalifa A, Hughes R, Baker AL (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Br J Surg 101(11):1448–1452.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9604 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee JS, Yoon YC (2016) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration using V-Loc suture with insertion of endobiliary stent. Surg Endosc 30(6):2530–2534.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4518-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Decker G, Borie F, Millat B, Berthou JC, Deleuze A, Drouard F, Guillon F, Rodier JG, Fingerhut A (2003) One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 17:12–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9012-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tai CK, Tang CN, Ha JP, Chau CH, Siu WT, Li MK (2004) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 18:910–914.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8216-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park JS, Jeong S, Han JY, Lee DH (2014) Endoscopic balloon dilation lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones. Dig Dis Sci 59:1898–1901.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3154-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Uskudar O, Parlak E, Disibeyaz S, Koksal AS, Cicek B, Kilic ZM, Odemis B, Sasmaz N (2013) Major predictors for difficult common bile duct stone. Turk J Gastroenterol 24:423–429.  https://doi.org/10.4318/tjg.2013.0511 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gigot JF, Navez B, Etienne J, Cambier E, Jadoul P, Guiot P, Kestens PJ (1997) A stratified intraoperative surgical strategy is mandatory during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stones. Lessons and limits from an initial experience of 92 patients. Surg Endosc 11:722–728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lei J, Wang J, Li Q, Wu P, Yuan R, Zhu H, Zou S, Shao J, Fang L (2016) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: T-shaped incision of cystic duct with FREDDY laser lithotripsy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:646–651.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgerySecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityNanchangChina
  2. 2.Jiangxi Province Engineering Research Center of Hepatobiliary DiseaseNanchangChina

Personalised recommendations