SAGES Mini Med School: inspiring high school students through exposure to the field of surgery

  • James C. RosserJr.
  • Timothy B. Legare
  • Charles Jacobs
  • Katherine M. Choi
  • Jeffrey P. Fleming
  • Jamie Nakagiri
Article

Abstract

Objective

The SAGES Mini Med School (SMMS) was designed to expose high school students to the field of surgery through mentoring, knowledge transfer, and hands-on experience with simulation. The objective of this paper is to profile the evolutionary development, performance metrics, and satisfaction queries of this innovative effort.

Methods

Sixty-one high school students, grades 9–12, took part in the (SMMS) program during the 2015 SAGES Annual Congress. The students completed a surgical skills lab session where they attempted tasks associated with the development of open surgical and laparoscopic skills. The lab included a warm-up with the validated Super Monkey Ball video game, Top Gun Pea Drop task, FLS Peg Transfer task, open knot tying station, and open instrument tie station.

Results

The following are the results of the surgical skills lab. For the Super Monkey Ball task, 60 students participated with an average score of 73.0 s (SD = 53.9; range 59.1–87.0; median = 74). Sixty students participated in the Surgeons Knot and Pea Drop tasks with average times of 26.6 s (SD = 19.3; range 21.7–31.6; median = 21.0) and 113.8 s (SD = 65.9; range 96.6–131.0; median = 101.0), respectively. Sixty students participated in the Instrument Tie and 56 students participated in the Peg Transfer stations with average times of 51.7 s (SD = 34.5; range 42.8–60.6; median = 39.5) and 173.1 s (SD = 25.0; range 166.4–179.8; median = 180.0), respectively. 51 (83.6%) agreed that the Mini Med School made them more likely to consider a career in medicine. When asked if the program made them more likely to consider a career in surgery 42 (68.8%) agreed. All 61 respondents (100%) said that they would recommend the program to others.

Conclusions

The SMMS program showed that the students had an excellent aptitude for the performance of validated surgical subtasks with high satisfaction, and increased consideration of a career in medicine/surgery. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the impact on workforce recruitment.

Keywords

Pipeline Surgical education Premedical Career choice Surgical skills High school 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Dr. Rosser has equity interest and is CEO of the Stealth Learning Company and intellectual properties were loaned to the project. The authors Legare, Dr. Jacobs, Choi, Fleming, and Nakagiri have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Arvantes J (2013) Radical primary care changes needed to meet coming demand for health care. Ann Fam Med 11(2):184–185.  https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1526 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petterson SM, Liaw WR, Phillips RL Jr, Rabin DL, Meyers DS, Bazemore AW (2012) Projecting US primary care physician workforce needs: 2010–2025. Ann Fam Med 10(6):503–509.  https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1431 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lynge DC, Larson EH, Thompson MJ, Rosenblatt RA, Hart LG (2008) A longitudinal analysis of the general surgery workforce in the United States, 1981–2005. Arch Surg 143(4):345–350.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.4.345 (discussion 351)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu JH, Etzioni DA, O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY (2004) The increasing workload of general surgery. Arch Surg 139(4):423–428.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.423 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Etzioni DA, Liu JH, Maggard MA, Ko CY (2003) The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg 238(2):170–177.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SLA.0000081085.98792.3d PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bland KI, Isaacs G (2002) Contemporary trends in student selection of medical specialties: the potential impact on general surgery. Arch Surg 137(3):259–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henningsen JA (2002) Why the numbers are dropping in general surgery: the answer no one wants to hear—lifestyle! Arch Surg 137(3):255–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stitzenberg KB, Sheldon GF (2005) Progressive specialization within general surgery: adding to the complexity of workforce planning. J Am Coll Surg 201(6):925–932.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.06.253 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fraher EP, Knapton A, Sheldon GF, Meyer A, Ricketts TC (2013) Projecting surgeon supply using a dynamic model. Ann Surg 257(5):867–872.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826fccfa CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patel MS, Mowlds DS, Khalsa B, Foe-Parker JE, Rama A, Jafari F, Whealon MD, Salibian A, Hoyt DB, Stamos MJ, Endres JE, Smith BR (2013) Early intervention to promote medical student interest in surgery and the surgical subspecialties. J Surg Educ 70(1):81–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.09.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nair N, Marciscano AE, Vivar KL, Schaeffer S, LaMont E, Francois F (2011) Introduction to the medical professions through an innovative medical student-run pipeline program. J Natl Med Assoc 103(9–10):832–838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Senf JH, Campos-Outcalt D, Watkins AJ, Bastacky S, Killian C (1997) A systematic analysis of how medical school characteristics relate to graduates’ choices of primary care specialties. Acad Med 72(6):524–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schneider B, Broda M, Judy J, Burkander K (2013) Pathways to college and STEM careers: enhancing the high school experience. New Dir Youth Dev 2013(140):9–29.  https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20076 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zayas LE, McGuigan D (2006) Experiences promoting healthcare career interest among high-school students from underserved communities. J Natl Med Assoc 98(9):1523–1531PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bly J (2006) What is medicine? Recruiting high-school students into family medicine. Can Fam Physician 52:329–334PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaye KE, Berns AL, Cress LR, Nazar AM (2014) Mini-medical school programs are an effective tool to introduce students to osteopathic medicine. J Am Osteopath Assoc 114(2):109–112.  https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2014.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosser JC (2008) Playin’ to Win. Morgan James Publishing, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosser JC Jr, Gentile DA, Hanigan K, Danner OK (2012) The effect of video game “warm-up” on performance of laparoscopic surgery tasks. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 16(1):3–9.  https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812x13291597715664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosser JC Jr, Liu X, Jacobs C, Choi KM, Jalink MB, Ten Cate Hoedemaker HO (2017) Impact of Super Monkey Ball and Underground video games on basic and advanced laparoscopic skill training. Surg Endosc 31(4):1544–1549.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5059-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosser JC Jr, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1998) Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. Arch Surg 133(6):657–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room—a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199(1):115–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lindenthal JJ, Delisa JA (2012) Promoting appreciation of the study and practice of medicine: inner workings of a Mini-Med program. Adv Med Educ Pract 3:73–78.  https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s30495 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chang A, Cavanaugh G, Kumar NS, Lee M, Stein D, Mulcahey MK (2016) Mini-medical school programs’ influence on students’ desire to pursue medicine. J Natl Med Assoc 108(3):152–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2016.05.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Henderson RI, Williams K, Crowshoe LL (2015) Mini-med school for Aboriginal youth: experiential science outreach to tackle systemic barriers. Med Educ Online 20:29561.  https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.29561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winkleby MA (2007) The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program: 18 years of a biomedical program for low-income high school students. Acad Med 82(2):139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31802d8de6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fincher RM, Sykes-Brown W, Allen-Noble R (2002) Health science learning academy: a successful “pipeline” educational program for high school students. Acad Med 77(7):737–738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Connolly KK, Hinshaw VS (2016) Medical School Hotline: the role of mini-medical schools in education. Hawai’i J Med Public Health 75(12):386–388Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Derck J, Zahn K, Finks JF, Mand S, Sandhu G (2016) Doctors of tomorrow: an innovative curriculum connecting underrepresented minority high school students to medical school. Educ Health 29(3):259–265.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.204219 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shaikh FM, Babar M, Cross KS (2013) Mini-Med School: promoting awareness of medicine as a career for suburban and rural high-school students. ANZ J Surg 83(6):481–486.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06288.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Furer S, Alam S, Rosser J (2017) Performance of high school students in a laparoscopic training program. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 21(2).  https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2016.00059

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Central Florida College of MedicineOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.University of Florida College of MedicineGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations