Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 2137–2148 | Cite as

Outermost layer-oriented medial approach for infrapyloric nodal dissection in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

  • Susumu Shibasaki
  • Koichi Suda
  • Masaya Nakauchi
  • Tetsuya Nakamura
  • Shinichi Kadoya
  • Kenji Kikuchi
  • Kazuki Inaba
  • Ichiro Uyama
Dynamic Manuscript



Based on our experience of suprapancreatic nodal dissection in laparoscopic gastrectomy, we developed an outermost layer-oriented medial approach for infrapyloric nodal dissection. The objective of this single-institution retrospective study was to determine the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of this novel and unique dissection procedure.


This approach can be performed in the same manner as suprapancreatic nodal dissection but by replacing the left gastric artery with the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA), the common hepatic artery with the anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery (ASPDA), and the splenic artery with the gastroduodenal artery. It comprises five steps: (1) mobilization of the transverse mesocolon along the prepancreatic membrane, (2) medial dissection along the dissectable layer between the pancreatic head and the dorsal side of the right gastroepiploic vein (RGEV), (3) division of the RGEV and determination of the lateral and cranial borders, (4) dissection along the outermost layer of the RGEA and ASPDA and transection of the infrapyloric artery and RGEA, and (5) transection of the duodenal bulb.


This novel method was applied in 112 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy from 2014 to 2015. The anatomical landmarks that we determined to appropriately identify the outermost layer were highly reproducible, and our novel procedure based on these landmarks was successfully completed in all cases, without any intraoperative complications. Furthermore, in all cases, no. 6 lymph nodes were fully and adequately dissected within the infrapyloric area anatomically defined in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma ver. 14. Pancreatic fistula occurred only in 1.8% cases.


This novel outermost layer-oriented medial approach is a robust procedure that may help laparoscopic surgeons in performing safe and reproducible infrapyloric nodal dissection.


Stomach neoplasms Gastrectomy Minimally invasive surgical procedures Lymph node excision Pancreatic fistula 



Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy


Lymph node


Gastroduodenal artery


Right gastroepiploic artery


Anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery


Right gastroepiploic vein


Infrapyloric artery


Gastrocolic trunk


Accessory right colic vein


Anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein


Right gastric artery




Postoperative day


Prepancreatic fascia


Transverse mesocolon


Greater omentum


Superior mesenteric vein.



This work was not supported by any grants or funding.

Compliance with ethical standards


Drs. Shibasaki, Suda, Nakauchi, Kikuchi, Nakamura, Kadoya, Inaba, and Uyama report no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplemental video clip #1—The inferior edge of the pancreatic body was incised in the direction of the pancreatic head. Then, the GCT and the origins of the RGEV and accessory RCV were identified. Mobilization of the transverse mesocolon was started from the right side of the junction of these three veins, toward the descending part of the duodenum in the mediolateral direction in front of the fusion plane on the transverse mesocolon. Through this process, the dissectable layer was identified between the transverse mesocolon and the prepancreatic fascia, and we could trace it easily. Once dissection was extended up to the duodenal wall, the mobilization process of the transverse mesocolon was completed. The greater omentum was then divided and preconditioning for the infrapyloric dissection process was completed. (WMV 23513 KB)

Supplemental video clip #2—Along the right side of the autonomic nerve sheaths of the RGEA, the delta zone was dissected and widened in the mediolateral direction. The autonomic nerves of the RGEA usually run down the surface of the pancreatic neck. Along these nerves of the pancreatic neck, we could identify the thin loose connective tissue layer between these nerves and the adipose tissue as the dissectable layer. Once dissection was continued up to the ASPDV and the autonomic nerve of the ASPDA was identified, adequate space could be found behind the RGEV. Then, the RGEV was divided after clipping, and incised along the ASPDV, which acted as the lateral border of the no. 6v LNs. In turn, the cranial border of the no. 6a/6i LNs was incised from the ventral side, along the greater curvature of the duodenal bulb. Then, the adipose tissue containing the no. 6 LNs was lifted up ventrally by the assistant and maintained adequate tension at the dissection line along the outermost layer. Dissection was continued along the outermost layer of the ASPDA, and the infrapyloric artery was identified and divided. After completing dissection around the outermost layer of the RGEA, the autonomic nerves around the RGEA were divided to elongate the neck of the RGEA. Then, the RGEA was divided after clipping. (WMV 39740 KB)

Supplemental video clip #3—The remnant tissues attached to the duodenal bulb were dissected along the greater curvature via the dorsal aspect of the duodenum. Subsequently, the RGA was identified at the dorsal side of the stomach. The right side of the RGA was incised along the lesser curvature of the duodenal wall. Then, the assistant retracted the adipose tissue at the lesser curvature from the ventral side, and the opening was widened. After the duodenal bulb was dissected circumferentially, the duodenum was transected using a linear stapler. (WMV 17122 KB)


  1. 1.
    Suda K, Nakauchi M, Inaba K, Ishida Y, Uyama I (2016) Minimally invasive surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Our experience and review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 22:4626–4637CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Hiratsuka M, Tsujinaka T, Kinoshita T, Arai K, Yamamura Y, Okajima K (2004) Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy—Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol 22:2767–2773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY (2010) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 251:417–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, Nakamura K, Hiki N, Saka M, Yamaue H, Yoshikawa T, Kojima K (2010) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer 13:238–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Takagi M, Yoshikawa Y, Fukagawa T, Terashima M, Misawa K, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Fukushima N, Yasuda T, Asao Y, Fujiwara Y, Sasako M (2017) Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 20:699–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. (2011) Gastric Cancer 14:101–112Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K (1995) New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 82:346–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maruyama K, Gunven P, Okabayashi K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T (1989) Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients. Ann Surg 210:596–602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shinohara H, Kurahashi Y, Kanaya S, Haruta S, Ueno M, Udagawa H, Sakai Y (2013) Topographic anatomy and laparoscopic technique for dissection of no. 6 infrapyloric lymph nodes in gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer 16:615–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shinohara H, Haruta S, Ohkura Y, Udagawa H, Sakai Y (2015) Tracing dissectable layers of mesenteries overcomes embryologic restrictions when performing infrapyloric lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 220:e81-e87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suda K, Nakauchi M, Inaba K, Ishida Y, Uyama I (2015) Revising robotic surgery for stomach, potential benefits revised II: prevention of pancreatic fistula. Transl Gastrointest Cancer 4:461–467Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanaya S, Haruta S, Kawamura Y, Yoshimura F, Inaba K, Hiramatsu Y, Ishida Y, Taniguchi K, Isogaki J, Uyama I (2011) Video: laparoscopy distinctive technique for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection: medial approach for laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. Surg Endosc 25:3928–3929CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uyama I, Kanaya S, Ishida Y, Inaba K, Suda K, Satoh S (2012) Novel integrated robotic approach for suprapancreatic D2 nodal dissection for treating gastric cancer: technique and initial experience. World J Surg Oncol 36:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4) (2017) Gastric Cancer 20:1–19Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H, Tamaki N, Isobe H, Katayama T, Wada Y, Ohtoshi M (2002) Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 195:284–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uyama I, Suda K, Satoh S (2013) Laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives. J Gastric Cancer 13:19–25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mori T, Kimura T, Kitajima M (2010) Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:18–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, Tsubosa Y, Satoh T, Yokomizo A, Fukuda H, Sasako M (2016) Extended clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan clinical oncology group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today 46:668–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sadler TW (ed) (2009) Langman’s medical embryology, 11th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suda K, Man IM, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Satoh S, Uyama I (2005) Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 29:673–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakauchi M, Suda K, Susumu S, Kadoya S, Inaba K, Ishida Y, Uyama I (2016) Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 30:5444–5452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susumu Shibasaki
    • 1
  • Koichi Suda
    • 1
    • 2
  • Masaya Nakauchi
    • 1
  • Tetsuya Nakamura
    • 1
  • Shinichi Kadoya
    • 1
  • Kenji Kikuchi
    • 1
  • Kazuki Inaba
    • 1
  • Ichiro Uyama
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryFujita Health UniversityToyoakeJapan
  2. 2.Cancer Center, School of MedicineKeio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations