LapTrain: multi-modality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy—results of a randomized controlled trial
Multiple training modalities for laparoscopy have different advantages, but little research has been conducted on the benefit of a training program that includes multiple different training methods compared to one method only. This study aimed to evaluate benefits of a combined multi-modality training program for surgical residents.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed on a porcine liver as the pre-test. Randomization was stratified for experience to the multi-modality Training group (12 h of training on Virtual Reality (VR) and box trainer) or Control group (no training). The post-test consisted of a VR LC and porcine LC. Performance was rated with the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score by blinded experts.
Training (n = 33) and Control (n = 31) were similar in the pre-test (GOALS: 13.7 ± 3.4 vs. 14.7 ± 2.6; p = 0.198; operation time 57.0 ± 18.1 vs. 63.4 ± 17.5 min; p = 0.191). In the post-test porcine LC, Training had improved GOALS scores (+ 2.84 ± 2.85 points, p < 0.001), while Control did not (+ 0.55 ± 2.34 points, p = 0.154). Operation time in the post-test was shorter for Training vs. Control (40.0 ± 17.0 vs. 55.0 ± 22.2 min; p = 0.012). Junior residents improved GOALS scores to the level of senior residents (pre-test: 13.7 ± 2.7 vs. 18.3 ± 2.9; p = 0.010; post-test: 15.5 ± 3.4 vs. 18.8 ± 3.8; p = 0.120) but senior residents remained faster (50.1 ± 20.6 vs. 25.0 ± 1.9 min; p < 0.001). No differences were found between groups on the post-test VR trainer.
Structured multi-modality training is beneficial for novices to improve basics and overcome the initial learning curve in laparoscopy as well as to decrease operation time for LCs in different stages of experience. Future studies should evaluate multi-modality training in comparison with single modalities.
Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00011040
KeywordsLaparoscopy Training Education Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Curriculum GOALS
The current study was supported by the Heidelberg Surgery Foundation. The full registered trial protocol can be accessed under http://www.drks.de (Registration No. DRKS00011040).
Study conception and design: Kowalewski, Nickel, Müller-Stich, Fischer. Acquisition of data: Friedrich, Garrow, Preukschas, Müller. Statistical analysis: Proctor, Kowalewski, Kenngott. Analysis and interpretation of data: Kowalewski, Proctor, Nickel, Preukschas, Garrow. Drafting of manuscript: Garrow, Kowalewski, Kenngott, Nickel, Friedrich. Critical revision: Müller-Stich, Nickel, Kenngott, Fischer, Müller.
Compliance with ethical standards
Felix Nickel reports receiving travel support for conference participation as well as equipment provided for laparoscopic surgery courses by KARL STORZ, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic. Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Carly R. Garrow, Tanja Proctor, Anas A. Preukschas, Mirco Friedrich, Philip Müller, Hannes Kenngott, Lars Fischer, and Beat Müller-Stich have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 12.Szinicz B, Zerz, Bodner (1997) Role of the pulsatile organ perfusion surgical simulator in surgery education. Langenbecks Archiv Surg 114:687–693Google Scholar
- 21.Friedrich M, Kowalewski K-F, Proctor T, Garrow C, Preukschas AA, Kenngott HG et al (2017) Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial on a multimodal training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy−LapTrain. Int J Surg Protoc 5:11–14Google Scholar
- 41.Nickel F, Kowalewski K, Müller-Stich B (2015) Risk awareness and training for prevention of complications in minimally invasive surgery. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 86(12):1121–1127Google Scholar