Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study
- 236 Downloads
There is limited evidence on the transferability of conventional laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic-assisted surgery. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the transferability of expertise in conventional laparoscopy and open surgery to robotic-assisted surgery using the da Vinci Skills Simulator (dVSS). Secondary aims included evaluating the influence of individual participants’ characteristics.
Participants performed four tasks on the dVSS: Peg Board 1 (PB), Pick and Place (PP), Thread the Rings (TR), and Suture Sponge 1 (SS). Participants were classified into three groups (Novice, Intermediate, Experts) according to experience in laparoscopic and open surgery. All tasks were performed twice except for SS. Performance was assessed using the built-in scoring system.
37 medical students and 25 surgeons participated. Experts did not perform significantly better than less experienced participants on the dVSS. Specifically, with regard to laparoscopic experience, total simulator scores were: Novices 68.2 ± 28.8; Intermediates 65.1 ± 31.2; Experts 65.1 ± 30.0; p = 0.611. Regarding open surgical experience, scores were: Novices 68.6 ± 28.7; Intermediates 68.2 ± 30.8; Experts 63.2 ± 30.3; p = 0.305. Although there were some significant differences among groups for single parameters in specific tasks, there was no constant superiority of one group. Laparoscopic and open surgical Novices improved significantly in overall score and time for all three tasks (p < 0.05). Laparoscopic intermediates improved only in PP time (4.64 ± 3.42; p = 0.006), open Intermediates in PB score (11.98 ± 13.01; p = 0.025), and open Experts in PP score (6.69 ± 11.48; p = 0.048). Laparoscopic experts showed no improvement. Participants with gaming experience had better overall scores than non-gamers when comparing all second attempts (Gamer 83.62 ± 7.57; Non-Gamer 76.31 ± 12.78; p = 0.008) as well as first and second attempts together (Gamer 72.08 ± 8.86; Non-Gamer 65.45 ± 11.68; p = 0.039). Musical and sports experience showed no correlation with robotic performance.
Robotic-assisted surgery requires skills distinct from conventional laparoscopy or open surgery. Basic robotic skills training prior to patient contact should be required.
KeywordsMinimally invasive surgery DaVinci Robotics Skill transfer Laparoscopy Training
The authors would like to thank Mr. Tilman Schlick from Intuitive Surgical Inc. for access to the dVSS which made the conduction of the study possible.
Study conception and design: Kowalewski, Nickel, Müller-Stich, Kenngott. Acquisition of data: Schmidt, Karadza, Romero, Kowalewski. Statistical analysis: Proctor, Pohl, Wennberg. Analysis and interpretation of data: Kowalewski, Schmidt, Wennberg, Proctor, Pohl. Drafting of manuscript: Schmidt, Wennberg, Kowalewski, Karadza, Nickel. Critical revision: Müller-Stich, Kenngott, Nickel, Romero.
The current study was supported by the Heidelberg Surgery Foundation and by the Ministry of Science and Arts of the State Baden Wurttemberg.
Compliance with ethical standards
Felix Nickel reports receiving travel support for conference participation as well as equipment provided for laparoscopic surgery courses by KARL STORZ, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic. Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Mona W. Schmidt, Tanja Proctor, Philipp Romero, Erica Wennberg, Emir Karadza Hannes Kenngott, and Beat Müller-Stich have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 9.Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Kennedy RH, Francis NK, Parvaiz A, Cunningham C, Rockall TA, Gudgeon AM, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2013) Is competency assessment at the specialist level achievable? A study for the national training programme in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England. Ann Surg 257(3):476–482. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318275b72a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, Jakimowicz JJ (2006) Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Simul Healthc 1(3):171–179. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sih.0000244452.43542.47 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hendrie JD, Nickel F, Bruckner T, Kowalewski KF, Garrow CR, Mantel M, Romero P, Muller-Stich BP (2016) Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial “The shoebox study”. Trials 17(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1145-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Nickel F, Brzoska JA, Gondan M, Rangnick HM, Chu J, Kenngott HG, Linke GR, Kadmon M, Fischer L, Muller-Stich BP (2015) Virtual reality training versus blended learning of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial with laparoscopic novices. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(20):e764. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000000764 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Finnegan KT, Meraney AM, Staff I, Shichman SJ (2012) da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: Correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance. Urology 80(2):330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.059 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Berkley J (2011) Automated Support for da Vinci Surgical System. DTIC DocumentGoogle Scholar
- 20.Teishima J, Hattori M, Inoue S, Ikeda K, Hieda K, Miyamoto K, Shoji K, Hayashi T, Kobayashi K, Kajiwara M, Egi H, Ohdan H, Matsubara A (2012) Impact of laparoscopic experience on the proficiency gain of urologic surgeons in robot-assisted surgery. J Endourol 26(12):1635–1638. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0308 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, Dimick J, Banerjee M, Birkmeyer NJ, Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (2013) Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 369 (15):1434–1442. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1300625 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I, Dankelman J, Forgione A, Lango T, Melzer A, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Rhodes M, Satava R, Tang CN, Vilallonga R, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (2015) European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc 29 (2):253–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3916-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Olthof E, Nio D, Bemelman WA (2008) The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. In: Bozovic V (ed) Medical Robotics. I-Tech Education and Publishing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 39.Giannotti D, Patrizi G, Di Rocco G, Vestri AR, Semproni CP, Fiengo L, Pontone S, Palazzini G, Redler A (2013) Play to become a surgeon: impact of Nintendo Wii training on laparoscopic skills. PLoS ONE 8(2):e57372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057372 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar