Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 2613–2619 | Cite as

SAGES’s advanced GI/MIS fellowship curriculum pilot project

  • Joshua J. Weis
  • Matthew Goldblatt
  • Aurora Pryor
  • Brian J. Dunkin
  • L. Michael Brunt
  • Daniel B. Jones
  • Daniel J. Scott
SAGES Pilot Project

Abstract

Background

The American health care system faces deficits in quality and quantity of surgeons. SAGES is a major stakeholder in surgical fellowship training and is responsible for defining the curriculum for the Advanced GI/MIS fellowship. SAGES leadership is actively adapting this curriculum.

Methods

The process of reform began in 2014 through a series of iterative meetings and discussions. A working group within the Resident and Fellow Training Committee reviewed case log data from 2012 to 2015. These data were used to propose new criteria designed to provide adequate exposure to core content. The working group also proposed using video assessment of an MIS case to provide objective assessment of competency.

Results

Case log data were available for 326 fellows with a total of 85,154 cases logged (median 227 per fellow). The working group proposed new criteria starting with minimum case volumes for five defined categories including foregut (20), bariatrics (25), inguinal hernia (10), ventral hernia (10), and solid organ/colon/thoracic (10). Fellows are expected to perform an additional 75 complex MIS cases of any category for a total of 150 required cases overall. The proposal also included a minimum volume of flexible endoscopy (50) and submission of an MIS foregut case for video assessment. The new criteria more clearly defined which surgeon roles count for major credit within individual categories. Fourteen fellowships volunteered to pilot these new criteria for the 2017–2018 academic year.

Conclusions

The new SAGES Advanced GI/MIS fellowship has been crafted to better define the core content that should be contained in these fellowships, while still allowing sufficient heterogeneity so that individual learners can tailor their training to specific areas of interest. The criteria also introduce innovative, evidence-based methods for assessing competency. Pending the results of the pilot program, SAGES will consider broad implementation of the new fellowship criteria.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Joshua J. Weis, Matthew Goldblatt, Aurora Pryor, Brian J. Dunkin, L. Michael Brunt, Daniel B. Jones, and Daniel J. Scott have nothing to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Dall T, Chakrabarti R, Iacobucci W, Hansari A, West T (2017) 2017 Update: the complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2015 to 2030. Association of American Medical Colleges, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB et al (2013) General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 258(3):440–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park A, Witzke D, Donnelly M (2002) Ongoing deficits in resident training for minimally invasive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6(3):501–507 (discussion 507–509)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewis FR, Klingensmith ME (2012) Issues in general surgery residency training-2012. Ann Surg 256(4):553–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scally CP, Sandhu G, Magas C, Gauger PG, Minter RM (2015) Investigating the Impact of the 2011 ACGME Resident Duty Hour Regulations on Surgical Residency Programs: The Program Director Perspective. J Am Coll Surg 221(4):883–889e881CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bell RH Jr, Banker MB, Rhodes RS, Biester TW, Lewis FR (2007) Graduate medical education in surgery in the United States. Surg Clin North Am 87(4):811–823.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ACGME (2017) Defined category minimum numbers: general surgery effective for program graduates beginning academic year 2017–2018, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ABS Flexible endoscopy curriculum for general surgery residents (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ABS Statement Regarding Residency Redesign (2016). https://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?news_resredesign0416. Accessed 25 Apr 2016
  10. 10.
    Borman KR, Vick LR, Biester TW, Mitchell ME (2008) Changing demographics of residents choosing fellowships: longterm data from the American Board of Surgery. J Am Coll Surg 206(5):782–788 (discussion 788–789)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swanstrom LL, Park A, Arregui M, Franklin M, Smith CD, Blaney C (2006) Bringing order to the chaos: developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships. Ann Surg 243(4):431–435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Board of Medical Specialties Announces New, Focused Practice Designation (2017). http://www.abms.org/media/136465/abms-announces-new-focused-practice-designation.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2017
  13. 13.
    Fellowship Council Accreditation Guidelines and Definitions (2016) https://fellowshipcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/FC-Accreditation-Guidelines-and-Definitions-4-2016-Web.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2017
  14. 14.
    Pearl J, Fellinger E, Dunkin B et al (2016) Guidelines for privileging and credentialing physicians in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 30(8):3184–3190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zuckerman R, Doty B, Bark K, Heneghan S (2007) Rural versus non-rural differences in surgeon performed endoscopy: results of a national survey. Am Surg 73(9):903–905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Palma GD, Forestieri P (2014) Role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery of patients. World J Gastroenterol 20(24):7777–7784CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wolter S, Dupree A, Miro J et al (2017) Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy prior to bariatric surgery-mandatory or expendable? An analysis of 801 cases. Obes Surg 27(8):1938–1943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Safavi A, Lai S, Butterworth S, Hameed M, Schiller D, Skarsgard E (2012) Does operative experience during residency correlate with reported competency of recent general surgery graduates? Can J Surg 55(4):S171–S177PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A et al (2013) Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 369(15):1434–1442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jones DB, Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr et al (2017) SAGES university MASTERS program: a structured curriculum for deliberate, lifelong learning. Surg Endosc 31(8):3061–3071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua J. Weis
    • 1
  • Matthew Goldblatt
    • 2
  • Aurora Pryor
    • 3
  • Brian J. Dunkin
    • 4
  • L. Michael Brunt
    • 5
  • Daniel B. Jones
    • 6
  • Daniel J. Scott
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at DallasDallasUSA
  2. 2.Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  4. 4.Houston Methodist HospitalHoustonUSA
  5. 5.Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  6. 6.Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations