Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

White paper: technology for surgical telementoring—SAGES Project 6 Technology Working Group

  • SAGES/EAES Official Publication
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent advances in telecommunication technology and video conferencing systems have opened a new avenue for surgical instruction called “surgical telementoring.” This report from the Technology Working Group of the SAGES Project 6 Summit reviews the telementoring technology that currently exists and proposes recommendations for minimum technology requirements and future technology development. While also providing insight in regulatory considerations, this review offers what prospective surgical telementoring participants need to know about the underlying technology with a specific focus on safety, reliability, transmission quality, ease of use, and cost.

Methods

Content experts from around the world, in minimally invasive surgery, surgical mentoring and telementoring, surgical education, business development, healthcare innovation, and regulation were invited to attend a 2-day summit in Los Angeles, USA to outline the current state of surgical telementoring and chart the challenges and opportunities going forward. This article summarizes the discussion, conclusions, and recommendation of the technology group with regard to telementoring technology.

Results

This article reviews the technical requirements which can be divided into the following categories: (1) safety, (2) reliability, (3) transmission quality, (4) ease of use, and (5) cost.

Conclusion

Telementoring applications are technology driven. Given the pace of change of technology, guiding principles in technology design and selection are warranted (Table 4). Telementoring technologies require two basic components, video capturing and display devices at the transmitting and receiving end, and a telecommunication link between them. Many additional features can be added to this basic setup including multiple cameras or video sources, remote camera zoom and pan, recording and storage of videos and images, and telestration capabilities to mention just a few. In general, the cost of these technologies is feature driven. The education framework for each specific application should determine the need for these features (Schlachta in Surg Endosc https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4988-5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schlachta CM, Nguyen NT, Ponsky T, Dunkin B (2016) Project 6 Summit: SAGES telementoring initiative. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4988-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. FDA’s mission statement. Retrieved from (2004) https://www.fda.gov/downloads/aboutfda/reportsmanualsforms/reports/budgetreports/ucm298331.pdf

  3. FDA: Medical device classifications and regulation. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices. Accessed 6 Jul 2016

  4. HIPAA Administrative Simplification Statute and Rules. http://www.hhs.gov

  5. NIAAA (2015) Privacy and security in mobile health (mHealth) research. Alcohol Res: Curr Rev 36:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adibi S, Wickramasinghe N, Chan C (2013) The cloud computing paradigm for mobile health. Int J Soft Comput Softw 3:403–410

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robin M (2005) Horizontal resolution: pixel or lines, vol 1. Broadcast Engineering

  8. Liu W-L, Zhang K, Locatis C, Ackerman M (2011) Internet-based videoconferencing coder/decoders and tools for telemedicine. Telemed e-Health 17:358–362. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2010.0193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Panayides A, Eleftheriou I, Pantziaris M (2013) Open-source telemedicine platform for wireless medical video communication. Int J Telemed Appl 2013:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/457491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogen EM (2014) Telementoring in education of laparoscopic surgeons: an emerging technology. WJGE 6:148–149. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etai M. Bogen.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Ponsky reports personal fees from Conmed, other from GlobalCastMD, outside the submitted work. Dr. Bogen, Dr. Schlachta have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bogen, E.M., Schlachta, C.M. & Ponsky, T. White paper: technology for surgical telementoring—SAGES Project 6 Technology Working Group. Surg Endosc 33, 684–690 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06631-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06631-8

Keywords

Navigation