Skip to main content

Outcomes and quality of life assessment after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) performed in the endoscopy unit with trainees

Abstract

Background

Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a promising option for the treatment of achalasia. This study assessed POEM training process, outcomes, and improvement in quality of life after POEM performed by an interventional endoscopist (mentor) with trainees.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of data for patients who underwent POEM with involvement of trainees. Trainees were trained in performing mucosotomy, submucosal dissection, creating submucosal tunnel, identifying gastroesophageal junction, myotomy, and closure of mucosal incision in a step-by-step fashion. Trainees’ performance on each step was evaluated by the mentor based on several key points in each step. The short form 36 (SF36) was obtained before and certain times after the primary POEM procedure was performed.

Results

Sixty-two patients, 26 males and 36 females with a mean age of 59 years, who underwent POEM were enrolled. A checklist included all related items for each step was established. All trainees obtained competence within 6 cases for each step. 61/62 (98.3%) patients had a significant improvement in the Eckardt’s score post POEM: 9.3 ± 1.5 prior to POEM and 2.6 ± 1.2 after the POEM (P = 0.001) and a decrease in mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LES): pre- and post-procedure mean LES pressures were 28.5 ± 11.4 and 12.1 ± 4.5 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.001). The SF-36 questionnaire demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life and comparable with those without trainees in other studies.

Conclusion

This preliminary study showed for the first time that training for POEM can be performed in a step-by-step fashion, learning mucosal incision, submucosal dissection, myotomy, and mucosal incision closure from an expert interventional endoscopist without increasing adverse events. The checklist for each step could be used as an important guide in training POEM. The outcomes of POEM in this study were similar to those reported by others without trainees. Further multiple center studies are needed to verify this training process and to establish a formal training protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF (2013) ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 108:1238–1249 (quiz 1250)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Cuttitta A, Elizalde JI, Fumagalli U, Gaudric M, Rohof WO, Smout AJ, Tack J, Zwinderman AH, Zaninotto G, Busch OR, European Achalasia Trial Investigation (2011) Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 364:1807–1816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yaghoobi M, Mayrand S, Martel M, Roshan-Afshar I, Bijarchi R, Barkun A (2013) Laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy versus pneumatic dilation in the treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 78:468–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE (2014) Achalasia Lancet 383:83–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khashab MA, Saxena P, Kumbhari V, Nandwani M, Roland BC, Stein E, Clarke JO, Stavropoulos S, Inoue H, Pasricha PJ (2014) Peroral endoscopic myotomy as a platform for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 79:136–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, Bruley des Varannes S, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Elizalde JI, Gaudric M, Smout AJ, Tack J, Busch OR, Zaninotto G, Boeckxstaens GE (2013) Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 144:718–725 (quiz e713–e714)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaezi MF, Baker ME, Achkar E, Richter JE (2002) Timed barium oesophagram: better predictor of long term success after pneumatic dilation in achalasia than symptom assessment. Gut 50:765–770

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vela MF, Richter JE, Khandwala F, Blackstone EH, Wachsberger D, Baker ME, Rice TW (2006) The long-term efficacy of pneumatic dilatation and Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:580–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khashab MA, El Zein M, Kumbhari V, Besharati S, Ngamruengphong S, Messallam A, Abdelgalil A, Saxena P, Tieu AH, Raja S, Stein E, Dhalla S, Garcia P, Singh VK, Pasricha PJ, Kalloo AN, Clarke JO (2016) Comprehensive analysis of efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy performed by a gastroenterologist in the endoscopy unit: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 83:117–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stavropoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Friedel D, Savides T (2013) The international per oral endoscopic myotomy survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc 27:3322–3338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42:265–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Sato C, Minami H, Yokomichi H, Kobayashi Y, Grimes KL, Kudo SE (2015) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg 221:256–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramchandani M, Nageshwar Reddy D, Darisetty S, Kotla R, Chavan R, Kalpala R, Galasso D, Lakhtakia S, Rao GV (2016) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: treatment analysis and follow up of over 200 consecutive patients at a single center. Dig Endosc 28:19–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Swanstrom LL, Kurian A, Dunst CM, Sharata A, Bhayani N, Rieder E (2012) Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg 256:659–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M, Boskoski I, Tringali A, Perri V, Costamagna G (2016) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first 100 patients with short-term follow-up. Ann Surg 263:82–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang D, Pannu D, Zhang Q, White JD, Draganov PV (2015) Evaluation of anesthesia management, feasibility and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia performed in the endoscopy unit. Endosc Int Open 3::E289–E295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, Chen J, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV, Gostout CJ (2007) Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 39:761–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ (2008) Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 135:1526–1533

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71:446–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Philips GM, Dacha S, Keilin SA, Willingham FF, Cai Q (2016) Concurrent myotomy and tunneling after establishment of a half tunnel instead of myotomy after establishment of a full tunnel: a more efficient method of peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endosc Int Open 4::E403–E408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stavropoulos SN, Desilets DJ, Fuchs KH, Gostout CJ, Haber G, Inoue H, Kochman ML, Modayil R, Savides T, Scott DJ, Swanstrom LL, Vassiliou MC (2014) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary. Surg Endosc 28:2005–2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eleftheriadis N, Inoue H, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Yoshida A, Hosoya T, Maselli R, Kudo SE (2012) Training in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Ther Clin Risk Manag 8:329–342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata A, Bhayani NH, Reavis KM, Swanstrom LL (2013) Peroral endoscopic esophageal myotomy: defining the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 77:719–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Arafat FO, Santos BF, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Hungness ES (2014) Analysis of a learning curve and predictors of intraoperative difficulty for peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM). J Gastrointest Surg 18:92–98 (discussion 98–99)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel KS, Calixte R, Modayil RJ, Friedel D, Brathwaite CE, Stavropoulos SN (2015) The light at the end of the tunnel: a single-operator learning curve analysis for per oral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 81:1181–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vigneswaran Y, Tanaka R, Gitelis M, Carbray J, Ujiki MB (2015) Quality of life assessment after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Surg Endosc 29:1198–1202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu XJ, Tan YY, Yang RQ, Duan TY, Zhou JF, Zhou XL, Liu DL (2015) The outcomes and quality of life of patients with achalasia after peroral endoscopic myotomy in the short-term. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 21:507–512

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Youssef Y, Richards WO, Sharp K, Holzman M, Sekhar N, Kaiser J, Torquati A (2007) Relief of dysphagia after laparoscopic Heller myotomy improves long-term quality of life. J Gastrointest Surg 11:309–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Katilius M, Velanovich V (2001) Heller myotomy for achalasia: quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. JSLS 5:227–231

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SD: obtaining IRB approval, collection and interpretation of data, drafting and revision of the article; LW: conception and revision of the article; GP: collection of data and revision of the article; XL, YJ, SAK, FFW: revision of the article; QC: Performing all procedures, obtaining IRB approval, conception and the design of the study, revision of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Cai.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Sunil Dacha, Lei Wang, Xaioyu Li, Yueping Jiang, George Philips, Steven A Keilin, Field F Willingham, Qiang Cai have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dacha, S., Wang, L., Li, X. et al. Outcomes and quality of life assessment after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) performed in the endoscopy unit with trainees. Surg Endosc 32, 3046–3054 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-6015-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-6015-x

Keywords

  • POEM
  • Achalasia
  • Dysphagia
  • Quality of life assessment