Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 2800–2807 | Cite as

SAGES Foregut Surgery Masters Program: a surgeon’s social media resource for collaboration, education, and professional development

  • Hope T. Jackson
  • Monica T. Young
  • H. Alejandro Rodriguez
  • Andrew S. Wright
Article

Abstract

Background

Facebook is a popular online social networking platform increasingly used for professional collaboration. Literature regarding use of Facebook for surgeon professional development and education is limited. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) has established a Facebook group dedicated to discussion of surgery of the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine—the “SAGES Foregut Surgery Masters Program.” The aim of this study is to examine how this forum is used for professional development, education, and quality improvement.

Methods

Member and post statistics were obtained from https://grytics.com, a Facebook group analytics service. All posts added to the Foregut forum since its creation in April 2015 through December 2016 were reviewed and categorized for content and topic. Posts were reviewed for potential identifiable protected health information.

Results

As of December 2016, there were 649 total members in the group. There have been a total of 411 posts and 4116 comments with a median of 10.1 comments/post (range 0–72). Posts were categorized as operative technique (64%), patient management (52%), continuing education (10%), networking (10%), or other (6%). Video and/or photos were included in 53% of posts with 4% of posts depicting radiologic studies and 13% with intraoperative photos or videos. An additional 40 posts included links to other pages, such as YouTube, journal articles, or the SAGES website. One post (0.2%) contained identifiable protected health information and was deleted once recognized by the moderators of the group.

Conclusion

Social media is a unique, real-time platform where surgeons can learn, discuss, and collaborate towards the goal of optimal treatment of surgical disease. Active online surgical communities such as the SAGES Foregut Surgery Masters Program have the potential to enhance communication between surgeons and are a potential innovative adjunct to traditional methods of continuing surgical education. Surgical societies should adopt and promote professional and responsible use of social media.

Keywords

Facebook Surgical education Social media Web 2.0 Collaboration SAGES 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Dr. Wright is an administrator of the Facebook group studied in this research, and all authors are participants in the group. Dr. Wright is also co-chair of the SAGES Communications committee, which has partial oversight over the group. Hope T. Jackson, Monica T. Young, H. Alejandro Rodriguez, and Andrew S. Wright have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose with regard to this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Margolin DA (2013) Social media and the surgeon. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 26(1):36–38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Panahi S, Watson J, Partridge H (2016) Social media and physicians: exploring the benefits and challenges. Health Inf J 22(2):99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGowan BS et al (2012) Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. J Med Internet Res 14(5):e117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antheunis ML, Tates K, Nieboer TE (2013) Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns 92(3):426–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper CP et al (2012) Physicians who use social media and other internet-based communication technologies. J Am Med Inf Assoc 19(6):960–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamout SZ et al (2011) Using social media to enhance surgeon and patient education and communication. Bull Am Coll Surg 96(7):7–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eysenbach G (2008) Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res 10(3):e22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Antonoff MB (2016) Using social media effectively in a surgical practice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151(2):322–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chui PC, Jacobs B. Quality improvement through social media: an initial look at the International Hernia Collaboration Facebook Group. https://www.sages.org/meetings/annual-meeting/abstracts-archive/quality-improvement-through-social-media-an-initial-look-at-the-international-hernia-collaboration-facebooktm-group/. Accessed 20 Oct 2017
  10. 10.
    Myers CG (2017) Social media as a platform for surgical learning: use and engagement patterns among robotic surgeons. Ann Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002479 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davenport THP (1997) Information ecology: mastering the information and knowledge environment. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rikkers LF (2002) The bandwagon effect. J Gastrointest Surg 6(6):787–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alie RE (1991) Ethical issues in health care institutions. Lesson 2: Ethical considerations in group decision making and groupthink. Radiol Manag 13(2):20–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hope T. Jackson
    • 1
  • Monica T. Young
    • 1
  • H. Alejandro Rodriguez
    • 1
  • Andrew S. Wright
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations