Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 31, Issue 10, pp 3827–3835 | Cite as

SAGES framework for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) courses for practicing surgeons: the new SAGES course endorsement system

  • Iman GhaderiEmail author
  • Michael Fu
  • Erin Schwarz
  • Timothy M. FarrellEmail author
  • John Paige
  • On behalf of the SAGES Continuing Education Committee
SAGES Official Publication

Preamble

The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) recognizes that the discipline of surgery is dynamic and continues to evolve. Modifications of standard surgical procedures and completely new procedures are usually introduced gradually into clinical practice, a process that may require special training or privileges. Additional training will often be required to integrate techniques or procedures that are new to the individual surgeon. The same is also true for procedures that represent a substantial change in existing methods or practices or that require familiarity with new technology [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. The purpose of this document is to provide guidelines for course directors who plan to design educational activities for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) of practicing surgeons. Additionally, it provides guidance regarding requirements for SAGES endorsement of such courses.

Disclaimer

This document is advisory, and directed at surgical educators,...

Keywords

Continuing Professional Development Medical education Course endorsement Practicing surgeons Curriculum Framework 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

John Paige, MD receives royalties as Co-Editor from Oxford University Press, Lead Faculty Team Training Grant from HRSA, Co-PI Software Development from LSU Board of Regents LIFT2, PI Assessment Tool Development from SGEA, and PI Wound Healing from ACell, Inc. Iman Ghaderi MD, Erin Schwarz, Michael Fu, and Timothy M Farrell MD have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Cheifetz RE, Phang PT (2006) Evaluating learning and knowledge retention after a continuing medical education course on total mesorectal excision for surgeons. Am J Surg 191:687–690CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R (2010) SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 24(10):2368–2386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rogers DA, Elstein AS, Bordage G (2001) Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg 2001(233):159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sachdeva AK, Russell TR (2007) Safe introduction of new procedures and emerging technologies in surgery: education, credentialing, and privileging. Surg Clin N Am 87:853–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sachdeva AK (2005) Acquiring skills in new procedures and technology: the challenge and the opportunity. Arch Surg 140:387–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pearl J, Fellinger E, Dunkin B, Pauli E, Trus T, Marks J, Fanelli R, Meara M, Stefanidis D, Richardson W (2016) Guidelines for privileging and credentialing physicians in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 30(8):3184–3190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grafinger DJ (1988) Basics of instructional systems development. American Society for Training and Development, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kern DE (1998) Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. JHU Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosser JC et al (2001) Telementoring and teleproctoring. World J Surg 25:1438–1448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moore DE, Green JS, Gallis HA (2009) Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof 29(1):1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller GE (1990) The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 65(9):S63–S67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mehay R (ed) (2012) The essential handbook for GP training and education. Radcliffe Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eva KW, Regehr G (2008) “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof 28(1):14–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghaderi I, Manji F, Park YS, Juul D, Ott M, Harris I, Farrell TM (2015) Technical skills assessment toolbox: a review using the unitary framework of validity. Ann Surg 261(2):251–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peck C, McCall M, McLaren B, Rotem T (2000) Continuing medical evaluation and continuing professional development: international comparisons. BMJ 320(7232):432CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iman Ghaderi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Fu
    • 2
  • Erin Schwarz
    • 3
  • Timothy M. Farrell
    • 3
    Email author
  • John Paige
    • 4
  • On behalf of the SAGES Continuing Education Committee
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.SAGES Continuing Education CommitteeLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.LSU Health New Orleans Health Sciences CenterNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations