Skip to main content
Log in

Passing the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) exam: linking specialty choice and attitudes about endoscopic surgery to success

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Previous work has shown that up to 30% of graduating surgery residents fail the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) exam. This study investigated the extent to which FES pass rates differ in a specific sample of individuals who have chosen a career in GI surgery and to examine the relationships between FES performance and confidence in performing flexible endoscopy.

Methods

Fellows attending the 2016 SAGES Flexible Endoscopy Course were invited to complete the FES manual skills examination. Participants also provided survey responses examining demographics, fellowship type, endoscopy curricula in residency, previous endoscopic case volume, confidence in performing endoscopy, and future practice plans.

Results

Twenty-nine (age: 32.24 ± 3.24; 72% men) fellows completed the FES skills examination. Reported fellowships were MIS/Bariatric (41.4%), MIS (24.1%), bariatric (13.8%), flexible endoscopy (6.9%), Advanced GI (6.9%), and MIS/bariatric/flexible endoscopy (6.9%). Almost half (41.4%) had previously participated in a simulation curricula, with 20.7% completing a didactic endoscopy curriculum. Fellows reported performing an average of 110 ± 109.48 EGDs and 77.44 ± 58.80 colonoscopies. The majority (96.4%) indicated that they will perform endoscopy at least occasionally in practice. Overall pass rate was 60%. Previous endoscopy experience did not correlate with overall FES examination scores. However, confidence performing EGDs (r = 0.57, p < 0.01), colonoscopies (r = 0.45, p < 0.05), polypectomy (r = 0.52, p < 0.01), and PEGs (r = 0.46, p < 0.05) did.

Conclusions

These data support existing research suggesting that current flexible endoscopy training in residency may be insufficient for trainees to pass the FES examination, and that failure rates hold true even for this select group of trainees who have chosen a profession in GI surgery and intend to use endoscopy in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Valentine RJ, Jones A, Biester TW, Cogbill TH, Borman KR, Rhodes RS (2011) General surgery workloads and practice patterns in the United States, 2007-2009: a 10 year update from the American Board of Surgery. Ann Surg 254:520–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. ABS General Surgery Training Requirements (2016) http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certgsqe_training. Accessed 29 Jan 2016

  3. Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum (2015) http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certgsqe_fec. Accessed 29 Jan 2015

  4. SAGES Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (2016) http://www.fesprogram.org/. Accessed 29 Jan 2016

  5. Hazey JW, Marks JM, Mellinger JD et al (2014) Why fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES)? Surg Endosc 28:701–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Poulose BK, Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ et al (2014) Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery cognitive examination: development and validity evidence. Surg Endosc 28:631–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Fried GM et al (2014) Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc 28:704–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Willis RE, Truitt MS, Uecker J, Brown KM, Marks JM, Dunkin BJ (2016) Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES? Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gardner AK, Marks JM, Pauli EM, Majumder A, Dunkin BJ (2017) Changing attitudes and improving skills: demonstrating the value of the SAGES flexible endoscopy course for fellows. Surg Endosc 31:147–152. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4944-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mueller CL, Kavena P, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC (2014) Colonoscopy performance correlates with scores on the FES manual skills test. Surg Endosc 28:3081–3085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. ASGE, AASLD, ACG, and AGA statement regarding the ABS mandate for surgery resident training in endoscopy (2011) https://gi.org/fellows-in-training/links/joint-society-statement-regarding-endoscopic-education/. Accessed 19 Mar 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aimee K. Gardner.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Dr. Aimee Gardner has ownership interest in SurgWise Consulting, LLC. Dr. Michael Ujiki receives speaking honoraria from Boston Scientific, Gore, and Medtronic. He is a consultant for Olympus. Dr. Brian Dunkin receives speaking honoraria from Boston Scientific Endoscopy, Ethicon, Gore, Medtronic (formerly Covidien), Olympus, and Pacira. He is a consultant for Boston Scientific Endoscopy and Olympus, and also has ownership interest in SurgWise Consulting, LLC. Aimee K. Gardner, Michael B. Ujiki, and Brian J. Dunkin have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gardner, A.K., Ujiki, M.B. & Dunkin, B.J. Passing the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) exam: linking specialty choice and attitudes about endoscopic surgery to success. Surg Endosc 32, 225–228 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5663-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5663-1

Keywords

Navigation