Skip to main content

A structured, extended training program to facilitate adoption of new techniques for practicing surgeons

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been shown to have significant benefits when compared to open inguinal hernia repair, yet remains underutilized in the United States. The traditional model of short, hands-on, cognitive courses to enhance the adoption of new techniques fails to lead to significant levels of practice implementation for most surgeons. We hypothesized that a comprehensive program would facilitate the adoption of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP) for practicing surgeons.

Methods

A team of experts in simulation, coaching, and hernia care created a comprehensive training program to facilitate the adoption of TEP. Three surgeons who routinely performed open inguinal hernia repair with greater than 50 cases annually were recruited to participate in the program. Coaches were selected based on their procedural expertise and underwent formal training in surgical coaching. Participants were required to evaluate all aspects of the educational program and were surveyed out to one year following completion of the program to assess for sustained adoption of TEP.

Results

All three participants successfully completed the first three steps of the seven-step program. Two participants completed the full course, while the third dropped out of the program due to time constraints and low case volume. Participant surgeons rated Orientation (4.7/5), GlovesOn training (5/5), and Preceptored Cases (5/5) as highly important training activities that contributed to advancing their knowledge and technical performance of the TEP procedure. At one year, both participants were performing TEPs for “most of their cases” and were confident in their ability to perform the procedure. The total cost of the program including all travel, personal coaching, and simulation was $8638.60 per participant.

Discussion

Our comprehensive educational program led to full and sustained adoption of TEP for those who completed the course. Time constraints, travel costs, and case volume are major considerations for successful completion; however, the program is feasible, acceptable, and affordable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83:1045–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program I (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LA, Rudberg CR (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 249:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Westin L, Wollert S, Ljungdahl M, Sandblom G, Gunnarsson U, Dahlstrand U (2016) Less pain 1 year after total extra-peritoneal repair compared with Lichtenstein using local anesthesia: data From a randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 263:240–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Trevisonno M, Kaneva P, Watanabe Y, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Andalib A, Vassiliou MC (2015) Current practices of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis. Hernia 19:725–733

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trevisonno M, Kaneva P, Watanabe Y, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Lebedeva E, Vassiliou MC (2015) A survey of general surgeons regarding laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: practice patterns, barriers, and educational needs. Hernia 19:719–724

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zerey M, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G, Park A, Heniford BT (2007) Does a one-day course influence surgeon adoption of laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy? J Surg Res 138:205–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Langeveld HR, van’t Riet M, Weidema WF, Stassen LP, Steyerberg EW, Lange J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramshaw BJ (2006) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Op Tech Gen Surg 8:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klisz E (2005) Life styles inventory and Meyers−Briggs type indicator: a comparison of two surveys. Hum Synerg Int

  12. DiMusto PD, Chen H, Kent KC (2016) Hands-on training in the operating room as a method of continuing education for surgeons in practice. JAMA Surg 151:869–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurashima Y, Feldman LS, Al-Sabah S, Kaneva PA, Fried GM, Vassiliou MC (2011) A tool for training and evaluation of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills-groin hernia (GOALS-GH). Am J Surg 201:54–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou AI, Granderath FA (2015) Past, present, and future of minimally invasive abdominal surgery. JSLS 19(3):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blum CA, Adams DB (2011) Who did the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy? J Minim Access Surg 7:165–168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (1994) Framework for post-residency surgical education and training. The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 8:1137–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers DA, Elstein AS, Bordage G (2001) Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg 233:159–166

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarker SJ, Telfah MM, Onuba L, Patel BP (2013) Objective assessment of skills acquisition during laparoscopic surgery courses. Surg Innov 20:530–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hance J, Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Munz Y, Undre S, Darzi A (2005) Assessment of psychomotor skills acquisition during laparoscopic cholecystectomy courses. Am J Surg 190:507–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pugh CM, Arafat FO, Kwan C, Cohen ER, Kurashima Y, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM (2015) Development and evaluation of a simulation-based continuing medical education course: beyond lectures and credit hours. Am J Surg 210:603–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu YY, Peyre SE, Arriaga AF, Osteen RT, Corso KA, Weiser TG, Swanson RS, Ashley SW, Raut CP, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA, Greenberg CC (2012) Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development. J Am Coll Surg 214:115–124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenberg CC, Ghousseini HN, Pavuluri Quamme SR, Beasley HL, Wiegmann DA (2015) Surgical coaching for individual performance improvement. Ann Surg 261:32–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Shanu N. Kothari, MD and Michael J. Garren, MD who served as surgical coaches for this project. We would also like appreciate the surgeons who participated in this program.

Funding

This project was funded by an investigator-initiated grant from Medtronic, Inc., the Susan Behrens, MD Professorship in Surgical Education Fund, and the Wisconsin Partnership Program for Education and Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob A. Greenberg.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Jacob A. Greenberg is a paid speaker for Medtronic, a paid consultant for Ariste Medical, and a paid speaker for W.L. Gore. Sally Jolles, Sudha Quamme, Sarah Sullivan, Carla Pugh, and Caprice Greenberg have no conflicts of interest. Efforts on this study and manuscript were made possible by a VA Career Development Award to Dr. Funk (CDA 15-060. The views represented in this article represent those of the authors and not those of the DVA or the US Government. This project was sponsored by support from Medtronic, but was product agnostic and did not require use of Medtronic products.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greenberg, J.A., Jolles, S., Sullivan, S. et al. A structured, extended training program to facilitate adoption of new techniques for practicing surgeons. Surg Endosc 32, 217–224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5662-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5662-2

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
  • Continuous professional development
  • Surgical coaching
  • Clinical performance assessment
  • Clinical outcomes
  • Simulation