Abstract
Background
The necessity for reoperation due to insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery has led to a novel endoluminal plication of the gastric sleeve using a endoscopic suturing device. Advances in endoluminal endoscopy and other minimally invasive bariatric surgeries have inspired innovative techniques and have produced reliable suturing tools for gastric volume reduction.
Methods
Retrospective pilot case series of 5 patients with an enlarged gastric sleeve.
Results
The data show a sustained weight loss for all patients ranging from 19 to 36 lbs at 1 year, with the greatest average weight loss (27 lbs) observed at 6 months. At 1 year post-op, the mean body mass index was 33 kg/m2. Four of the patients were considered successful, with a excess weight loss (EWL) sustained at 1 year post-procedure, ranging from 21 to 61% with a mean of 38%. One patient experienced a EWL of only 13%, which was attributed to failed lifestyle modification. The mean EWL of the series is 33%. The percent total weight loss (%WL) ranged from 6.7 to 17.2%.
Conclusions
The endoluminal approach with an endoscopic suturing device for sleeve revision by plication is showing early promising results and expands the management of weight gain following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. This simple approach may offer a significant option for these patients as an interventional strategy in the early phases of weight regain, and prior to reaching a BMI of 40 kg/m2, such as the traditional surgical approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Szewczyk T, Janczak P, Janiak A, Gaszyński T, Modzelewski B (2014) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—7 years of own experience. Wideochir Inne Tech Malo Inwazyjne 9(3):427–435
Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G (2010) Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg 252(2):319–324
Eid GM, Brethauer S, Mattar SG, Titchner RL, Gourash W, Schauer PR (2012) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for super obese patients: forty-eight percent excess weight loss after 6 to 8 years with 93% follow-up. Ann Surg 256(2):262–265
Deitel M, Gagner M, Erickson AL, Crosby RD (2011) Third international summit: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7(6):749–759
Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, Saunders JK, Ude-Welcome A, Gagner M (2013) Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg 257(2):231–237
Prevot F, Verhaeghe P, Pequignot A et al (2014) Two lessons from a 5-year follow-up study of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: persistent, relevant weight loss and a short surgical learning curve. Surgery 155(2):292–299
Dakin GF, Eid G, Mikami D, Pryor A, Chand B, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Emerging Technology and Procedures Committee (2013) Endoluminal revision of gastric bypass for weight regain—A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(3):335–342
Gautier T, Sarcher T, Contival N, Le Roux Y, Alves A (2013) Indications and mid-term results of conversion from sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 23(2):212–215
Rebibo L, Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, Deguines JB, Dhahri A, Regimbeau JM (2012) Repeat sleeve gastrectomy compared with primary sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center, matched case study. Obes Surg 22(12):1909–1915
Ryou M, Ryan MB, Thompson CC (2011) Current status of endoluminal bariatric procedures for primary and revision indications. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 21(2):315–333
Kourkoulos M, Giorgakis E, Kokkinos C et al (2012) Laparoscopic gastric plication for the treatment of morbid obesity: a review. Minim Invasive Surg 2012:696348
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure
Dr. George Eid has no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eid, G. Sleeve gastrectomy revision by endoluminal sleeve plication gastroplasty: a small pilot case series. Surg Endosc 31, 4252–4255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5469-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5469-1