Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of two specimen retrieval techniques in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: what is the role of endobag?

  • Review
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a popular stand-alone treatment for morbid obesity. However, removal of the gastric specimen could be a challenging step due to its large size relative to the width of the trocar site.

Objectives

We aimed to compare a simplified retrieval technique for extraction of the gastric specimen without an endobag with conventionally performed specimen retrieval using an endobag.

Methods

A case-control study was conducted recruiting patients undergoing LSG. Patient’s demographics, preoperative characteristics, intra-operative, and postoperative variables were compared between the two groups according to the technique of gastric specimen removal.

Results

A total of 193 patients (60.6% female) were enrolled into case (n = 100) and control groups (n = 93). Mean ± SD age and BMI of patients were 35.64 ± 11.84 years and 47.28 ± 8.22 Kg/m2, respectively with no significant difference between groups. Median (25th, 75th inter-quartile), extraction time was significantly reduced in the non-endobag group compared to the endobag group (3.5 [2.5–4.5] min vs. 6.5 [3.4–8.2] min, p = 0.03).Patients of both groups had similar intra-operative and trocar site complications (hernia and wound infection) (3% for endobag group and 3.3 % for non-endobag group). The median (25–75% [IQR]) LOS was also comparable between endobag and non-endobag patients (3[2–3] vs. 3[2–4] days, p = 0.84). No difference was observed between the two groups for weight loss and comorbidity resolution.

Conclusion

Non-endobag technique for gastric specimen retrieval is safe and feasible with substantial saving in operative time and comparable intra-operative and postoperative outcomes to the conventional retrieval technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N (2015) Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013. Obes Surg 25(10):1822–1832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK (2014) Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD003641

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenthal RJ, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, Baker RS, Basso N, Bellanger D, et al (2012) International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of > 12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8(1):8–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lirici MM, Romeo V, Simonelli L, Tierno S, Vitelli CE (2016) Minimizing the access trauma of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: the transoral specimen extraction technique. Obes Surg 26(1):229–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maietta P, Milone M, Coretti G, Galloro G, Conzo G, Docimo G, et al (2016) Retrieval of the gastric specimen following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Experience on 275 cases. Int J Surg 28(Suppl 1): S124–S127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Casella G, Soricelli E, Fantini A, Basso N (2010 Apr) A time-saving technique for specimen extraction in sleeve gastrectomy. World J Surg 34(4):765–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alley JB, Fenton SJ, Peterson RM (2009 Jul) The “Tip-Stitch”: a time-saving technique for specimen extraction in sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 19(7):926–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Casciola L, Codacci-Pisanelli M, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Di Zitti L, Patriti A (2008) A modified umbilical incision for specimen extraction after laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 22(3):784–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabrielsen J, Petrick A, Ibele A, Wood GC, Benotti P (2014 Sep) A novel technique for wound protector deployment and efficient specimen extraction following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 18(9):1678–1682

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhardwaj N, Mees ST, Hensman C (2014 Nov) Endoloop-assisted alignment–a simple, effective, cheap, and safe technique to aid specimen extraction following sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 24(11):2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorecki P, Chery J, Lee J, Tortolani A, Gorecki W (2014 Oct) Intraabdominal partitioning of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy remnant optimizes the specimen extraction ergonomics and postoperative pain and is an attractive technique in teenage patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24(10):735–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sumer F, Kayaalp C, Ertugrul I, Yagci MA, Karagul S (2015) Total laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction is feasible in advanced gastric cancer. Int J Surg Case Rep 16:56–58

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang S, Jiang ZW, Wang G, Feng XB, Liu J, Zhao J, et al (2015) Robotic gastrectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction for female gastric cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 21(47):13332–13332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dotai T, Coker AM, Antozzi L, Acosta G, Michelotti M, Bildzukewicz N et al (2013) Transgastric large-organ extraction: the initial human experience. Surg Endosc 27(2):394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our appreciation to Anabela Rodrigues for her endeavors in preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan A. Saber.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Drs. Saeed Shoar, Shereen Aboutaleb, Mohsen Karem, Moataz M. Bashah, Mohamed AlKuwari, Davit Sargsyan, and Alan A. Saber declare no conflict of interest in any forms, and they have no financial ties to any party.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All patients singed an informed consent before the surgery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shoar, S., Aboutaleb, S., Karem, M. et al. Comparison of two specimen retrieval techniques in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: what is the role of endobag?. Surg Endosc 31, 4883–4887 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5434-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5434-z

Keywords

Navigation