Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Outcome of stent grafting for esophageal perforations: single-center experience

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent studies showed that stent grafting is a promising technique for treatment of esophageal perforation. However, the evidence of its benefits is still scarce.

Methods

Forty-three consecutive patients underwent stent grafting for esophageal perforation at the Oulu University Hospital, Finland. The main endpoints of this study were early and mid-term mortality. Secondary outcome endpoints were the need of esophagectomy and additional surgical procedures on the esophagus and extraesophageal structures.

Results

Patients’ mean age was 64.6 ± 13.4 years. The mean delay to primary treatment was 23 ± 27 h. The most frequent cause of perforation was Boerhaave’s syndrome (46.5%). The thoraco-abdominal segment of the esophagus was affected in 58.1% of cases. Minor primary procedures were performed in 25 patients (58.1%) and repeat surgical procedures in 23 patients (53.5%). Forty-nine repeat stent graftings were performed in 22 patients (50%). Two patients (4.7%) underwent esophagectomy, one for unrelenting preprocedural stricture of the esophagus and another for persistent leakage of a perforated esophageal carcinoma. The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 6.0 ± 7.5 days and the in-hospital stay was 24.3 ± 19.6 days. In-hospital mortality was 4.6%. Three-year survival was 67.2%.

Conclusions

Stent grafting seems to be an effective less invasive technique for the treatment of esophageal perforation. Repeat stent grafting and procedures on the pleural spaces are often needed to control the site of perforation and for debridement of surrounding infected structures. Stent grafting allows the preservation of the esophagus in most of patients. The mid-term survival of these patients is suboptimal and requires further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biancari F, D’Andrea V, Paone R, Di Marco C, Savino G, Koivukangas V, Saarnio J, Lucenteforte E (2013) Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies. World J Surg 37:1051–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Biancari F (2012) On the need of standards for reporting on esophageal perforation. G Chir 33:254–258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Biancari F, Saarnio J, Mennander A, Hypén L, Salminen P, Kuttila K, Victorzon M, Böckelman C, Tarantino E, Tiffet O, Koivukangas V, Søreide JA, Viste A, Bonavina L, Vidarsdóttir H, Gudbjartsson T (2014) Outcome of patients with esophageal perforations: a multicenter study. World J Surg 38:902–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vallböhmer D, Hölscher AH, Hölscher M, Bludau M, Gutschow C, Stippel D, Bollschweiler E, Schröder W (2010) Options in the management of esophageal perforation: analysis over a 12-year period. Dis Esophagus 23:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koivukangas V, Biancari F, Merilainen S, Ala-Kokko T, Saarnio J (2012) Esophageal stenting for spontaneous esophageal perforation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:1011–1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrett NR (1947) Report of a case of spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus successfully treated by operation. Br J Surg 35:216–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou JH, Gong TQ, Jiang YG, Wang RW, Zhao YP, Tan QY, Ma Z, Lin YD, Deng B (2009) Management of delayed intrathoracic esophageal perforation with modified intraluminal esophageal stent. Dis Esophagus 22:434–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Navaneethan U, Lourdusamy V, Duvuru S, Lourdusamy D, Mehta D, Raja S, Murthy S, Sanaka MR (2015) Timing of esophageal stent placement and outcomes in patients with esophageal perforation: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 29:700–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mason GR (2001) Esophageal perforations, anastomotic leaks, and strictures: the role of prostheses. Am J Surg 181:195–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Keeling WB, Miller DL, Lam GT, Kilgo P, Miller JI, Mansour KA, Force SD (2010) Low mortality after treatment for esophageal perforation: a single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 90:1669–1673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman RK, Herrera A, Ascioti AJ, Dake M, Mahidhara RS (2015) A propensity-matched comparison of cost and outcomes after esophageal stent placement or primary surgical repair for iatrogenic esophageal perforation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 149:1550–1555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nason KS (2015) Is open surgery for iatrogenic esophageal perforation now a surgical relic, like bloodletting and trepanation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 149:1556–1557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Vyverberg A, Ascioti AJ (2009) Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of spontaneous esophageal perforations. Ann Thorac Surg 88:194–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman RK, Ascioti AJ, Giannini T, Mahidhara RJ (2012) Analysis of unsuccessful esophageal stent placements for esophageal perforation, fistula, or anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg 94:959–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Salminen P, Gullichsen R, Laine S (2009) Use of self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks. Surg Endosc 23:1526–1530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-David K, Behrns K, Hochwald S, Rossidis G, Caban A, Crippen C, Caranasos T, Hughes S, Draganov P, Forsmark C, Chauhan S, Wagh MS, Sarosi G (2014) Esophageal perforation management using a multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment algorithm. J Am Coll Surg 218:768–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. El H II, Imperiale TF, Rex DK, Ballard D, Kesler KA, Birdas TJ, Fatima H, Kessler WR, DeWitt JM (2014) Treatment of esophageal leaks, fistulae, and perforations with temporary stents: evaluation of efficacy, adverse events, and factors associated with successful outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 79:589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman RK, Ascioti AJ, Dake M, Mahidhara RS (2015) An assessment of the optimal time for removal of esophageal stents used in the treatment of an esophageal anastomotic leak or perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 100:422–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Persson S, Elbe P, Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Kumagai K, Lundell L, Nilsson M, Tsai JA (2014) Predictors for failure of stent treatment for benign esophageal perforations—a single center 10-year experience. World J Gastroenterol 20:10613–10619

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman RK, Ascioti AJ, Dake M, Mahidhara RS (2014) An analysis of esophageal stent placement for persistent leak after the operative repair of intrathoracic esophageal perforations. Ann Thorac Surg 97(1715):9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Onat S, Ulku R, Cigdem KM, Avci A, Ozcelik C (2010) Factors affecting the outcome of surgically treated non-iatrogenic traumatic cervical esophageal perforation: 28 years experience at a single center. J Cardiothorac Surg 5:46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindenmann J, Matzi V, Neuboeck N, Anegg U, Maier A, Smolle J, Smolle-Juettner FM (2013) Management of esophageal perforation in 120 consecutive patients: clinical impact of a structured treatment algorithm. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1036–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pezzetta E, Kokudo T, Uldry E, Yamaguchi T, Kudo H, Ris HB, Christodoulou M, Vuilleumier H, Halkic N (2016) The surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation (boerhaave’s syndrome) 20 years of experience. Biosci Trends 10:120–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin Y, Jiang G, Liu L, Jiang JX, Chen L, Zhao Y, Yang J (2014) Management of thoracic esophageal perforation. World J Surg 38:1093–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanwright PJ, Purnell CA, Dumanian GA (2015) Flap reconstruction for esophageal perforation complicating anterior cervical spinal fusion: an 18-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e400

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Schweigert M, Santos Sousa H, Solymosi N, Yankulov A, Fernández MJ, Beattie R, Dubecz A, Rabl C, Law S, Tong D, Petrov D, Schäbitz A, Stadlhuber RJ, Gumpp J, Ofner D, McGuigan J, Costa-Maia J, Witzigmann H, Stein HJ (2016) Spotlight on esophageal perforation: a multinational study using the pittsburgh esophageal perforation severity scoring system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151:1002–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Linden PA, Bueno R, Mentzer SJ, Zellos L, Lebenthal A, Colson YL, Sugarbaker DJ, Jaklitsch MT (2007) Modified T-tube repair of delayed esophageal perforation results in a low mortality rate similar to that seen with acute perforations. Ann Thorac Surg 83:1129–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kroepil F, Schauer M, Raffel AM, Kropil P, Eisenberger CF, Knoefel WT (2013) Treatment of early and delayed esophageal perforation. Indian J Surg 75:469–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. de Aquino JL, de Camargo JG, Cecchino GN, Pereira DA, Bento CA, Leandro-Merhi VA (2014) Evaluation of urgent esophagectomy in esophageal perforation. Arq Bras Cir Dig 27:247–250

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Flanagan JC, Batz R, Saboo SS, Nordeck SM, Abbara S, Kernstine K, Vasan V (2016) Esophagectomy and gastric pull-through procedures: surgical techniques, imaging features, and potential complications. Radiographics 36:107–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Heits N, Stapel L, Reichert B, Schafmayer C, Schniewind B, Becker T, Hampe J, Egberts JH (2014) Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy in esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1029–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hasimoto CN, Cataneo C, Eldib R, Thomazi R, Pereira RS, Minossi JG, Cataneo AJ (2013) Efficacy of surgical versus conservative treatment in esophageal perforation: a systematic review of case series studies. Acta Cir Bras 28:266–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, PL 21, 90029, Oulu, Finland

    Fausto Biancari, Tuomas Tauriainen, Tatu Ylikotila, Vesa Koivukangas & Juha Saarnio

  2. Department of Surgery, Central Ostrobothnia Central Hospital, Kokkola, Finland

    Misa Kokkonen

  3. Department of Surgery, Lapland Central Hospital, Rovaniemi, Finland

    Jukka Rintala

  4. Department of Surgery, Kainuu Central Hospital, Kajaani, Finland

    Elisa Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck

Authors
  1. Fausto Biancari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tuomas Tauriainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tatu Ylikotila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Misa Kokkonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jukka Rintala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elisa Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vesa Koivukangas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Juha Saarnio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fausto Biancari.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Drs. Fausto Biancari, Tuomas Tauriainen, Tatu Ylikotila, Misa Kokkonen, Jukka Rintala, Elisa Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck, Vesa Koivukangas, Juha Saarnio stated that they do not have any conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Board of our Institution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biancari, F., Tauriainen, T., Ylikotila, T. et al. Outcome of stent grafting for esophageal perforations: single-center experience. Surg Endosc 31, 3696–3702 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5408-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5408-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation