Skip to main content
Log in

Leadership development in a professional medical society using 360-degree survey feedback to assess emotional intelligence

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The current research evaluated the potential utility of a 360-degree survey feedback program for measuring leadership quality in potential committee leaders of a professional medical association (PMA). Emotional intelligence as measured by the extent to which self-other agreement existed in the 360-degree survey ratings was explored as a key predictor of leadership quality in the potential leaders.

Study Design

A non-experimental correlational survey design was implemented to assess the variation in leadership quality scores across the sample of potential leaders. A total of 63 of 86 (76%) of those invited to participate did so. All potential leaders received feedback from PMA Leadership, PMA Colleagues, and PMA Staff and were asked to complete self-ratings regarding their behavior.

Results

Analyses of variance revealed a consistent pattern of results as Under-Estimators and Accurate Estimators-Favorable were rated significantly higher than Over-Estimators in several leadership behaviors.

Conclusions

Emotional intelligence as conceptualized in this study was positively related to overall performance ratings of potential leaders. The ever-increasing roles and potential responsibilities for PMAs suggest that these organizations should consider multisource performance reviews as these potential future PMA executives rise through their organizations to assume leadership positions with profound potential impact on healthcare. The current findings support the notion that potential leaders who demonstrated a humble pattern or an accurate pattern of self-rating scored significantly higher in their leadership, teamwork, and interpersonal/communication skills than those with an aggrandizing self-rating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markakis KM, Beckman HB, Suchman AL, Frankel RM (2000) The path of professionalism: cultivating humanistic values and attitudes in residency training. Acad Med 75(2):141–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McAlearney AS, Fisher D, Heiser K, Robbins D, Kelleher K (2004) Developing effective physician leaders: changing cultures and transforming organizations. Hosp Top 83:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams SJ (2000) What skills do physician leaders need now and in the future? Phys Exec 27(3):46–48

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stoller JK (2008) Developing physician-leaders: key competencies and available programs. J Health Adm Educ 25:307–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baron RM (2006) The bar-on model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema 18(1):13–25

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT (eds) (2010) Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  7. Humphrey C (2010) Assessment and remediation for physicians with suspected performance problems: an international survey. J Contin Educ Health Prof 30(1):26–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alimo-Metcalfe B (1998) 360-degree feedback and leadership development. Int J Sel Assess 6:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Atwater L, Waldman D (1998) 360-degree feedback and leadership development. Leadersh Q 9(4):424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thach EC (2002) The impact of executive coaching and 360 feedback on leadership effectiveness. Leadersh Organ Dev J 23(4):205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleenor JW, Smither JW, Atwater LE, Braddy PW, Sturm RE (2010) Self–other rating agreement in leadership: a review. Leadersh Q 21(6):1005–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Atwater LE, Yammarino FJ (1997) Self-other rating agreement: a review and model. In: Ferris GR (ed) Research in personnel and human resources management, vol 15. Elsevier Science/JAI Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hageman MG, Ring DC, Gregory PJ, Rubash HE, Harmon L (2015) Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(5):1590–1597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nurudeen SM, Kwakye G, Berry WR et al (2015) Can 360-degree reviews help surgeons? Evaluation of multisource feedback for surgeons in a multi-institutional quality improvement project. J Am Coll Surg 221(4):837–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bratton VK, Dodd NG, Brown FW (2011) The impact of emotional intelligence on accuracy of self-awareness and leadership performance. Leadersh Organ Dev J 32(2):127–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Coelho K (2012) Brief report: bridging the divide for better health harnessing the power of emotional intelligence to foster an enhanced clinician-patient relationship. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health 4:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hammerly ME, Harmon L, Schwaitzberg SD (2014) Good to great: using 360-degree feedback to improve physician emotional intelligence. J Healthc Manag 59:354–366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul J. Gregory.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Gregory and Harmon are employees of the Physicians Development Program, sole proprietor of the PULSE 360 Survey.

Ethical approval

Approval for this research was granted by the Cambridge Health Alliance through the Harvard School of Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gregory, P.J., Robbins, B., Schwaitzberg, S.D. et al. Leadership development in a professional medical society using 360-degree survey feedback to assess emotional intelligence. Surg Endosc 31, 3565–3573 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5386-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5386-8

Keywords

Navigation