Skip to main content

OR fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity

Abstract

Background

The Virtual Electrosurgical Skill Trainer is a tool for training surgeons the safe operation of electrosurgery tools in both open and minimally invasive surgery. This training includes a dedicated team-training module that focuses on operating room (OR) fire prevention and response. The module was developed to allow trainees, practicing surgeons, anesthesiologist, and nurses to interact with a virtual OR environment, which includes anesthesia apparatus, electrosurgical equipment, a virtual patient, and a fire extinguisher. Wearing a head-mounted display, participants must correctly identify the “fire triangle” elements and then successfully contain an OR fire. Within these virtual reality scenarios, trainees learn to react appropriately to the simulated emergency. A study targeted at establishing the face validity of the virtual OR fire simulator was undertaken at the 2015 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons conference.

Methods

Forty-nine subjects with varying experience participated in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. The subjects were asked to complete the OR fire training/prevention sequence in the VEST simulator. Subjects were then asked to answer a subjective preference questionnaire consisting of sixteen questions, focused on the usefulness and fidelity of the simulator.

Results

On a 5-point scale, 12 of 13 questions were rated at a mean of 3 or greater (92%). Five questions were rated above 4 (38%), particularly those focusing on the simulator effectiveness and its usefulness in OR fire safety training. A total of 33 of the 49 participants (67%) chose the virtual OR fire trainer over the traditional training methods such as a textbook or an animal model.

Conclusions

Training for OR fire emergencies in fully immersive VR environments, such as the VEST trainer, may be the ideal training modality. The face validity of the OR fire training module of the VEST simulator was successfully established on many aspects of the simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Sankaranarayanan G, Li B, Miller A, Wakily H, Jones SB, Schwaitzberg S, Jones DB, De S, Olasky J (2016) Face validation of the Virtual Electrosurgery Skill Trainer (VEST(©)). Surg Endosc 30(2):730–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman LS, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, Mischna J, Schwaitzberg SD (2012) Surgeons don’t know what they don’t know about the safe use of energy in surgery. Surg Endosc 26:2735–2739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Willson PD, McAnena OJ, Peters EE (1994) A fatal complication of diathermy in laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 3:19–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Greilich PE, Greilich NB, Froelich EG (1995) Intraabdominal fire during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 83:871–874

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart MW, Bartley GB (2015) Fires in the operating room: prepare and prevent. Ophthalmology 122(3):445–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Institute ECRI (2012) Top 10 health technology hazards for 2013. Health Devices 41:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  7. FUSE FUSE manual. http://www.fuseprogram.org/. Accessed 29 Apr 2015

  8. Institute ECRI (2009) New clinical guide to surgical fire prevention. Patients can catch fire—here’s how to keep them safer. Health Devices 38:314–332

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barfield W, Furness TA (1995) Virtual environments and advanced interface design. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. FDA Preventing Surgical Fires. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/SafeUseInitiative/PreventingSurgicalFires/default.htm. Accessed 2 Aug 2015

  11. Madani A, Jones DB, Fuchshuber P, Robinson TN, Feldman LS (2014) Fundamental use of surgical energy™ (FUSE): a curriculum on surgical energy-based devices. Surg Endosc 28:2509–2512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oculus VR Oculus Rift Development Kit 2. https://www.oculus.com/dk2/. Accessed 29 Apr 2015

  13. Corp AT Ascension TrakSTAR2. http://www.ascension-tech.com/products/trakstar-drivebay/. Accessed 29 Apr 2015

  14. Halic T, Venkata SA, Sankaranarayanan G, Lu Z, Ahn W, De S (2011) A software framework for multimodal interactive simulations (SoFMIS). Stud Health Technol Inform 163:213–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. SourceForge SPARK 1.5.5. http://sourceforge.net/projects/sparkengine/. Accessed 20 Jul 2015

  16. Reeves WT (1983) Particle systems—a technique for modeling a class of fuzzy objects. ACM Trans Graph 2:91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hart SR, Yajnik A, Ashford J, Springer R, Harvey S (2011) Operating room fire safety. Ochsner J 11:37–42

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Draeger Safety Inc Interior Live Fire Training System (ILFTS). http://www.draeger.com/sites/enus_us/Pages/Fire-Services/Interior-Live-Fire-Training-System-(ILFTS).aspx. Accessed 20 Jul 2015

  19. Corvetto MA, Hobbs GW, Taekman JM (2011) Fire in the operating room. Simul Healthc 6:356–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. BullEx Attack Digital Fire System. http://bullex.com/product/attack/. Accessed 20 Jul 2015

  21. Stuart R (2001) The design of virtual environments. Barricade Books, Fort Lee

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the FUSE VEST advisory committee, particularly Dr. Malcolm Munro, for the valuable feedback used to guide this research. The authors also grateful acknowledge the assistance of Sean Radigan (CeMSIM, RPI) for the technical support during the development of this simulator, and Becca Kennedy (CeMSIM, RPI) for recording the verbal summary of the training sequence.

Funding

This project was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants NIH/NIBIB 2R01EB005807, 5R01EB010037, 1R01EB009362, 1R01EB014305.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaisa Olasky.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Daniel B. Jones is the chair of the SAGES FUSE committee and consultant to Allurion and Intuitive Surgical. Dr. Steven Schwaitzberg has served on advisory panels and has received an honorarium from Stryker and Olympus. He has served on advisory panels for Neatstitch and Surgicquest, Arch Therapeutics Acuity Bio and Human Extensions. He has also received a Grant from Ethicon. Dr. Suvranu, Denis Dorozhkin, Stephanie B. Jones, Caroline Cao, Jaisa Olasky, Marcos Molina, Steven Henriques, Jeff Flinn and Jinling Wang have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dorozhkin, D., Olasky, J., Jones, D.B. et al. OR fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity. Surg Endosc 31, 3527–3533 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5379-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5379-7

Keywords

  • FUSE
  • Electrosurgery
  • OR fire
  • Virtual reality
  • Simulator