Skip to main content
Log in

Retention of laparoscopic and robotic skills among medical students: a randomized controlled trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although simulation training beneficially contributes to traditional surgical training, there are less objective data on simulation skills retention.

Objective

To investigate the retention of laparoscopic and robotic skills after simulation training.

Methods

We present the second stage of a randomized single-blinded controlled trial in which 40 simulation-naïve medical students were randomly assigned to practice peg transfer tasks on either laparoscopic (N = 20, Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery, Venture Technologies Inc., Waltham, MA) or robotic (N = 20, dV-Trainer, Mimic, Seattle, WA) platforms. In the first stage, two expert surgeons evaluated participants on both tasks before (Stage 1: Baseline) and immediately after training (Stage 1: Post-training) using a modified validated global rating scale of laparoscopic and robotic operative performance. In Stage 2, participants were evaluated on both tasks 11–20 weeks after training.

Results

Of the 40 students who participated in Stage 1, 23 (11 laparoscopic and 12 robotic) underwent repeat evaluation. During Stage 2, there were no significant differences between groups in objective or subjective measures for the laparoscopic task. Laparoscopic-trained participants’ performances on the laparoscopic task were improved during Stage 2 compared to baseline measured by time to task completion, but not by the modified global rating scale. During the robotic task, the robotic-trained group demonstrated superior economy of motion (p = .017), Tissue Handling (p = .020), and fewer errors (p = .018) compared to the laparoscopic-trained group. Robotic skills acquisition from baseline with no significant deterioration as measured by modified global rating scale scores was observed among robotic-trained participants during Stage 2.

Conclusion

Robotic skills acquired through simulation appear to be better maintained than laparoscopic simulation skills.

Clinical trial

This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02370407).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236(4):458–463. doi:10.1097/01.SLA.0000028969.51489.B4 (discussion 463–4)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gala R, Orejuela F, Gerten K et al (2013) Effect of validated skills simulation on operating room performance in obstetrics and gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 121(3):578–584. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318283578b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cho JS, Hahn KY, Kwak JM et al (2013) Virtual reality training improves da Vinci performance: a prospective trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(12):992–998. doi:10.1089/lap.2012.0396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards KA, Kader K, Pettus JA, Smith JJ, Hemal AK (2011) Does initial learning curve compromise outcomes for robot-assisted radical cystectomy? A critical evaluation of the first 60 cases while establishing a robotics program. J Endourol 25(9):1553–1558. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière G-B, Nyssen A-S (2007) Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 194(1):115–121. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Teishima J, Hattori M, Inoue S et al (2012) Impact of laparoscopic experience on the proficiency gain of urologic surgeons in robot-assisted surgery. J Endourol 26(12):1635–1638. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Panait L, Shetty S, Shewokis PA, Sanchez JA (2014) Do laparoscopic skills transfer to robotic surgery? J Surg Res 187(1):53–58. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Morel P (2009) Impact of IQ, computer-gaming skills, general dexterity, and laparoscopic experience on performance with the da Vinci surgical system. Int J Med Robot 5(3):327–331. doi:10.1002/rcs.264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hiemstra E, Kolkman W, van de Put MAJ, Jansen FW (2009) Retention of basic laparoscopic skills after a structured training program. Gynecol Surg 6(3):229–235. doi:10.1007/s10397-008-0458-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Teishima J, Hattori M, Inoue S et al (2014) Retention of robot-assisted surgical skills in urological surgeons acquired using Mimic dV-Trainer®. Can Urol Assoc J 8(7–8):1–5. doi:10.5489/cuaj.1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Connor E, Raker C, Wohlrab K (2016) Effects of repetition and inactivity on laparoscopic skills training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(2):194–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187(1):247–252. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG et al (2005) A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 190(1):107–113. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173:226–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomaier L, Orlando M, Abernethy M, Paka C, Chen CCG (2016) Laparoscopic and robotic skills are transferable in a simulation setting: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5359-y

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenthal ME, Ritter EM, Goova MT et al (2010) Proficiency-based Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery skills training results in durable performance improvement and a uniform certification pass rate. Surg Endosc 24(10):2453–2457. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0985-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Touchard C, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2005) Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 138(2):165–170. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sinha P, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL (2008) Do the laparoscopic skills of trainees deteriorate over time? Surg Endosc 22(9):2018–2025. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9929-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spruit EN, Band GPH, Hamming JF (2015) Increasing efficiency of surgical training: effects of spacing practice on skill acquisition and retention in laparoscopy training. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3931-x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, De Ridder D, Miserez M (2013) The optimal frequency of endoscopic skill labs for training and skill retention on suturing—a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Educ 70(3):384–393. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Varley M, Choi R, Kuan K et al (2014) Prospective randomized assessment of acquisition and retention of SILS skills after simulation training. Surg Endosc 29(1):113–118. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3647-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was presented at the 2016 CREOG/APGO Annual Meeting, March 3, 2016, in New Orleans, Louisiana. The Mimic Technologies, Inc., dV-trainer was on loan to the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions for the duration of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi Chiung Grace Chen.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

MSO, LT, MGA and CCGC have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orlando, M.S., Thomaier, L., Abernethy, M.G. et al. Retention of laparoscopic and robotic skills among medical students: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 31, 3306–3312 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5363-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5363-2

Keywords

Navigation