Abstract
Background
The aim of colonic stenting with self-expandable metallic stents in neoplastic colon obstruction is to avoid emergency surgery and thus potentially reduce morbidity, mortality, and need for a stoma. Concern has been raised, however, about the effect of colonic stenting on short-term complications and long-term survival. We compared morbidity rates after colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery (SBTS) versus emergency surgery (ES) in the management of left-sided malignant large-bowel obstruction.
Methods
This multicentre randomised controlled trial was designed with the endorsement of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. The study population was consecutive patients with acute, symptomatic malignant left-sided large-bowel obstruction localised between the splenic flexure and 15 cm from the anal margin. The primary outcome was overall morbidity within 60 days after surgery.
Results
Between March 2008 and November 2015, 144 patients were randomly assigned to undergo either SBTS or ES; 29/144 (13.9%) were excluded post-randomisation mainly because of wrong diagnosis at computed tomography examination. The remaining 115 patients (SBTS n = 56, ES n = 59) were deemed eligible for analysis. The complications rate within 60 days was 51.8% in the SBTS group and 57.6% in the ES group (p = 0.529). Although long-term follow-up is still ongoing, no statistically significant difference in 3-year overall survival (p = 0.998) and progression-free survival rates between the groups has been observed (p = 0.893). Eleven patients in the SBTS group and 23 in the ES group received a stoma (p = 0.031), with a reversal rate of 30% so far.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that the two treatment strategies are equivalent. No difference in oncologic outcome was found at a median follow-up of 36 months. The significantly lower stoma rate noted in the SBTS group argues in favour of the SBTS procedure when performed in expert hands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gandrup P, Lund L, Balslev I (1992) Surgical treatment of acute malignant large bowel obstruction. Eur J Surg 158:427–430
Mauro MA, Koehler RE, Baron TH (2000) Advances in gastrointestinal intervention: the treatment of gastroduodenal and colorectal obstructions with metallic stents. Radiology 215:659–669
Dohomoto M (1991) New method-endoscopic implantation of rectal stent in palliative treatment of malignant stenosis. Endosc Dig 3:1507–1512
Tejero E, Mainar A, Fernandez L, Tieso A, San Jose A (1995) New procedure for relief of malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg 82:34–35
Knight AL, Trompetas V, Saunders MP, Anderson HJ (2012) Does stenting of left-sided colorectal cancer as a “bridge to surgery” adversely affect oncological outcomes? A comparison with non-obstructing elective left-sided colonic resections. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1509–1514
Sabbagh C, Browet F, Diouf M, Cosse C, Brehant O, Bartoli E, Mauvais F, Chauffert B, Dupas JL, Nguyen-Khac E, Regimbeau JM (2013) Is stenting as “a bridge to surgery” an oncologically safe strategy for the management of acute, left-sided, malignant, colonic obstruction? A comparative study with a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 258:107–115
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
van Hooft JE, Bemelman WA, Oldenburg B, Marinelli AW, Lutke Holzik MF, Grubben MJ et al (2011) Colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 12:344–352
Alcántara M, Serra-Aracil X, Falcó J, Mora L, Bombardó J, Navarro S (2011) Prospective, controlled, randomized study of intraoperative colonic lavage versus stent placement in obstructive left-sided colonic cancer. World J Surg 35:1904–1910
Tung KLM, Cheung HYS, Ng LWC, Chung CCC, Li MKW (2013) Endo-laparoscopic approach versus conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial. Asian J Endosc Surg 6:78–81
Sloothaak DAM, van den Berg MW, Dijkgraaf MGW, Fockens P, Tanis PJ, van Hooft JE et al (2014) Oncological outcome of malignant colonic obstruction in the Dutch Stent-In 2 trial. Br J Surg 101:1751–1757
Ansaloni L, Andersson RE, Bazzoli F, Catena F, Cennamo V, Di Saverio S et al (2010) Guidelines in the management of obstructing cancer of the left colon: consensus conference of the world society of emergency surgery (WSES) and peritoneum and surgery (PnS) society. World J Emerg Surg WJES 28(5):29
Al Samaraee A, McCallum IJ, Kenny L, Isreb S, Macdougall L, Hayat M et al (2011) Colorectal stents: do we have enough evidence? Int J Surg Lond Engl 9:595–599
Bonin EA, Baron TH (2010) Update on the indications and use of colonic stents. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 12:374–382
Cennamo V, Luigiano C, Coccolini F, Fabbri C, Bassi M, De Caro G et al (2013) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing endoscopic stenting and surgical decompression for colorectal cancer obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:855–863
Kim MK, Kye B-H, Lee IK, Oh ST, Ahn CH, Lee YS et al (2016) Outcome of bridge to surgery stenting for obstructive left colon cancer. ANZ J Surg 23:1867–1874
SCOTIA study group (1995) Single-stage treatment for malignant left-side colonic obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing subtotal colectomy with segmental resection following intraoperative irrigation. Br J Surg 82:1622–1627
van Hooft JE, van Halsema EE, Vanbiervliet G, Beets-Tan RGH, DeWitt JM, Donnellan F et al (2014) Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Gastrointest Endosc 80:747–761
De Ceglie A, Filiberti R, Baron TH, Ceppi M, Conio M (2013) A meta-analysis of endoscopic stenting as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 88:387–403
Acknowledgements
The present study received endorsement by the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Drs. Alberto Arezzo, Carmen Balague, Eduardo Targarona, Felice Borghi, Giorgio Giraudo, Luigi Ghezzo, Antonio Arroyo, Javier Sola-Vera, Paolo De Paolis, Maurizio Bossotti, Elisa Bannone, Edoardo Forcignanò, Marco Augusto Bonino, Roberto Passera, and Mario Morino have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arezzo, A., Balague, C., Targarona, E. et al. Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (ESCO trial). Surg Endosc 31, 3297–3305 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5362-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5362-3