Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tokyo Guidelines 2013 may be too restrictive and patients with moderate and severe acute cholecystitis can be managed by early cholecystectomy too

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine whether early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is safe and feasible for patients diagnosed with moderate (grade 2) and severe (grade 3) acute cholecystitis (AC) according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13).

Background

Early cholecystectomy is the current accepted standard of care for patients with mild (grade 1) and selected grade 2 AC based on TG13. For selected grade 2 and grade 3 AC, early percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) followed by delayed cholecystectomy is recommended.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with AC over a 14-month period were identified and divided into three grades of AC based upon chart review using the grading and severity indicators according to TG13.

Results

A total of 149 patients underwent emergency LC. Eighty-two (55 %) patients were male. Eighty-four (56.4 %) patients were classified as grade 1 AC, 49 (32.9 %) as grade 2, and 16 (10.7 %) as grade 3. Eighty-three (98.8 %) patients with grade 1 AC underwent emergency LC, and 1 patient (1.2 %) underwent PC followed by emergency LC. The median length of hospital stay for grade 1 AC patients was 2 (1–11) days. There were 2 (2.4 %) readmissions with fever and no additional complications. Among the 65 patients identified with grade 2 or 3 AC, 6 (9.2 %) underwent PC followed by emergency LC. Fifty-nine (90.8 %) patients underwent emergency cholecystectomy: 58 (98.3 %) LC and one (1.7 %) open cholecystectomy. Among the 58 patients with LC, 3 (5.2 %) patients had open conversion and 10 (17.2 %) patients required subtotal cholecystectomy. One patient was converted to open due to bile duct injury and had hepaticojejunostomy repair. Two other patients were converted due to dense adhesions and inability to safely dissect Calot’s triangle. The median length of hospital stay was 4 (1–28) days. There was one readmission for ileus.

Conclusion

Severity grading of AC is not the sole determinant of early LC. Patient comorbidity also impacts clinical decision. Confirmation in a larger cohort is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K (2004) Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. Br J Surg 91:734–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Behari A, Kapoor VK (2012) Asymptomatic gallstones (AsGS)—to treat or not to? Indian J Surg 74:4–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM et al (2013) TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:35–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miura F, Takada T, Strasberg SM et al (2013) TG13 flowchart for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:47–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamashita Y, Takada T, Strasberg SM et al (2013) TG13 surgical management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamashita Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y et al (2007) Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:91–97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker MJ, Gurusamy K, Stoker M (2004) Surgery in elderly patients. Curr Orthop 18(5):333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tornqvist B, Waage A, Zheng Z, Ye W, Nilsson M (2016) Severity of acute cholecystitis and risk of iatrogenic bile duct injury during cholecystectomy, a population-based case-control study. World J Surg 40(5):1060–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeo CS, Tay VM, Low JK, Woon WW, Punamiya SJ, Shelat VG (2016) Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of eventual cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 23(1):65–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kimura T, Suzuki K, Umehara Y, Kawabe A, Wada H (2005) Features and management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 12(1):61–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mizrahi I, Mazeh H, Yuval JB, Almogy G, Bala M, Simanovski N et al (2015) Perioperative outcomes of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis with and without percutaneous cholecystostomy. Surgery 158:728–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N, Calmes JM, Schafer M (2011) Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter? World J Surg 35:826–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. CharlsonME PompeiP, AlesKL MacKenzieCR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2006) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  15. Croo Alexander, De Wolf Edward, Boterbergh Kim, Vanlander Aude, Peeters Harald, Troisi Roberto, Berrevoet Frederik (2014) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: support for an early interval surgery. Acta Gastro-Enterol Belg 77(3):306–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Minutolo V, Liccicardello A, Arena M, Nicosia A, Di Stefano B, Cali G, Arena G (2014) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: comparison of outcomes and costs between early and delayed cholecystectomy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18:40–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roulin D, Saadi A, Di Mare L, Demartines N, Halkic N (2016) Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, are the 72 hours still the rule? A randomized trial. Ann Surg 264(5):717–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Borzellino G, Sauerland S, Minicozzi AM et al (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results. Surg Endosc 22:8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sartelli M, Weber DG, Ruppe E, Bassetti M, Wright BJ, Ansaloni L et al (2016) Antimicrobials: a global alliance for optimizing their rational use in intra-abdominal infections (AGORA). World J Emerg Surg 11:33. doi:10.1186/s13017-016-0089-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmed S, Chia CLK, Junnarkar SP, Woon W, Shelat VG (2016) Percutaneous drainage for giant pyogenic liver abscess—is it safe and sufficient? Am J Surg 211:95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shelat VG, Chia CLK, Yeo CSW, Qiao W, Woon W, Junnarkar SP (2015) Pyogenic liver abscess: does Escherichia coli cause more adverse outcomes than Klebsiella Pneumoniae? World J Surg 39:2535–2542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bourgouin S, Mancini J, Monchal T, Calvary R, Bordes J, Balandraud P (2016) How to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Proposal for a simple preoperative scoring system. Am J Surg. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.04.003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beksac K, Turhan N, Karaagaoglu E, Abbasoglu O (2016) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery: a new predictive statistical model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(9):693–696

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shelat VG, Chia JM, Low JK (2015) Common bile duct exploration in an elderly Asian population. Int Surg 100:261–267

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tan KK, Shelat VG, Liau KH, Chan CY, Ho CK (2010) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: our first 50 cases. Ann Acad Med Singap 39:136–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shelat VG, Chan CY, Liau KH, Ho CK (2012) Laparoscopic exploration can salvage failed endoscopic bile duct stone extraction. Singap Med J 53:313–317

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kamalapurkar D, Pang TC, Siriwardhane M, Hollands M, Johnston E, Pleass H et al (2015) Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe. ANZ J Surg. doi:10.1111/ans.12986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakajima J, Sasaki A, Obuchi T, Baba S, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G (2009) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Surg Today 39:870–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chia CL, Shelat VG, Low W, George S, Rao J (2014) The use of Collatamp G, local gentamicin-collagen sponge in reducing wound infection. Int Surg 99:565–570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Liau KH, Aung KT, Chua N, Ho CK, Chan CY, Kow AW et al (2010) Outcome of a strategy to reduce surgical site infection in a tertiary-care hospital. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ansaloni L, Pisano M, Coccolini F, Peitzmann AB, Fingerhut A, Catena F et al (2016) 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg 11:25. doi:10.1186/s13017-016-0082-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of General Surgery-HPB, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Annex 1, Level 4 General Surgery Office, Singapore, Singapore

    Vinoban Amirthalingam, Jee Keem Low, Winston Woon & Vishalkumar Shelat

Authors
  1. Vinoban Amirthalingam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jee Keem Low
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Winston Woon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vishalkumar Shelat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinoban Amirthalingam.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Vinoban Amirthalingam, Low Jee Keem, Winston Woon, Vishalkumar Shelat have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amirthalingam, V., Low, J., Woon, W. et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2013 may be too restrictive and patients with moderate and severe acute cholecystitis can be managed by early cholecystectomy too. Surg Endosc 31, 2892–2900 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5300-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5300-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation