Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of different training exercises on the performance outcome on the da Vinci Skills Simulator

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Increasing usage of robotic surgery presents surgeons with the question of how to acquire the special skills required. This study aimed to analyze the effect of different exercises on their performance outcomes.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted on the da Vinci Skills Simulator from December 2014 till August 2015. Sixty robotic novices were included and randomized to three groups of 20 participants each. Each group performed three different exercises with comparable difficulty levels. The exercises were performed three times in a row within two training sessions, with an interval of 1 week in between. On the final training day, two new exercises were added and a questionnaire was completed. Technical metrics of performance (overall score, time to complete, economy of motion, instrument collisions, excessive instrument force, instruments out of view, master work space range, drops, missed targets, misapplied energy time, blood loss and broken vessels) were recorded by the simulator software for further analysis.

Results

Training with different exercises led to comparable results in performance metrics for the final exercises among the three groups. A significant skills gain was recorded between the first and last exercises, with improved performance in overall score, time to complete and economy of motion for all exercises in all three groups.

Conclusions

As training with different exercises led to comparable results in robotic training, the type of exercise seems to play a minor role in the outcome. For a robotic training curriculum, it might be important to choose exercises with comparable difficulty levels. In addition, it seems to be advantageous to limit the duration of the training to maintain the concentration throughout the entire session.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Intuitive Surgical. Investor relations http://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-irhome

  2. Bernstein Leibhard LLP. da Vinci robot lawsuit information center. www.davincirobotlawsuitcase.com

  3. Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A (2015) A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gallagher AG, O’Sullivan GC (2011) Fundamentals of surgical simulation. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alzahrani THR, Alkhayal A, Delisle J, Drudi L, Gotlieb W, Fraser S, Bergman S, Bladou F, Andonian S, Anidjar M (2013) Validation of the da Vinci Surgical Skill Simulator across three surgical disciplines: a pilot study. Can Urol Assoc J 7:e520–e529

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Aboumarzouk O, Guru KA, Challacombe B, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K (2013) Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators—a systematic review. BJU Int 111:194–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hung AJ, Jayaratna IS, Teruya K, Desai MM, Gill IS, Goh AC (2013) Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods. BJU Int 112:864–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, Cai J, Ng CK, Aron M, Gill IS, Desai MM (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. Urology 186:1019–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Huynh VB, Etafy M, McDougall EM (2012) Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator—role as an assessment tool? J Urol 187:998–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liss MA, Abdelshehid C, Quach S, Lusch A, Graversen J, Landman J, McDougall EM (2012) Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer and the da Vinci surgical skills simulator using the Mimic software for urologic robotic surgical education. J Endourol 26:1629–1634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramos P, Montez J, Tripp A, Ng CK, Gill IS, Hung AJ (2014) Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool. BJU Int 113:836–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gomez PP, Willis RE, van Sickle KR (2015) Development of a virtual reality robotic surgical curriculum using the da Vinci Si surgical system. Surg Endosc 29(8):2171–2179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Calatayud D, Arora S, Aggarwal R, Kruglikova I, Schulze S, Funch-Jensen P, Grantcharov T (2010) Warm-up in a virtual reality environment improves performance in the operating room. Ann Surg 251(6):1181–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahol K, Satava RM, Ferrara J, Smith ML (2009) Effect of short-term pretrial practice on surgical proficiency in simulated environments: a randomized trial of the “preoperative warm-up” effect. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):255–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheth SS, Fader AN, Tergas AI, Kushnir CL, Green IC (2014) Virtual reality robotic surgical simulation: an analysis of gynecology trainees. J Surg Educ 71:125–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Walliczek U, Förtsch A, Dworschak P, Teymoortash A, Mandapathil M, Werner J, Güldner C (2015) Effect of training frequency on the learning curve on the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Head Neck. doi:10.1002/hed.24312 [Epub ahead of print], Dec 17, 2015

  17. Lyons C, Goldfarb D, Jones SL, Badhiwala N, Miles B, Link R, Dunkin BJ (2013) Which skills really matter? Proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator. Surg Endosc 27:2020–2030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel A, Patel M, Lytle N, Toro JP, Medbery RL, Bluestein S, Perez SD, Sweeney JF, Davis SS, Lin E (2014) Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice? Surg Endosc 28:847–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tergas AI, Sheth SB, Green IC, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Winder AD, Fader AN (2013) A pilot study of surgical training using a virtual robotic surgery simulator. JSLS 17(2):219–226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Marburg, University of Gießen and Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany

    U. Walliczek-Dworschak, M. Schmitt, I Diogo, A. Ecke, M. Mandapathil, A. Teymoortash & C. Güldner

  2. Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital of Marburg, University of Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    P. Dworschak

Authors
  1. U. Walliczek-Dworschak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Schmitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Dworschak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I Diogo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Ecke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Mandapathil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Teymoortash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. C. Güldner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Walliczek-Dworschak.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Ute Walliczek-Dworschak, Marie Schmitt, Philipp Otto Georg Dworschak, Isabel Diogo, Anja Ecke, Magis Mandapathil, Afshin Teymoortash and Christian Güldner have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 495 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walliczek-Dworschak, U., Schmitt, M., Dworschak, P. et al. The effect of different training exercises on the performance outcome on the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Surg Endosc 31, 2397–2405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5240-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5240-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation