Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic wedge resection for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is now widely accepted, but its application for large GISTs remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LWR for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric GISTs.

Methods

Retrospective review of 82 consecutive patients who underwent attempted LWR for suspected gastric GIST. LWR for large (≥5 cm) (n = 23) tumors was compared with LWR for small (<5 cm) tumors (n = 59). The 23 patients with LWR for large tumors were also compared to 36 consecutive patients who underwent open wedge resection (OWR) for large tumors.

Results

Comparison between patients who underwent LWR for large versus small tumors demonstrated that resection of large tumors was associated with a longer operating time. There was no difference in other perioperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes such as frequency of close margins (≤1 mm) and recurrence-free survival. Comparison between patients who underwent LWR versus OWR for large tumors showed that LWR was associated with decreased median time to fluid or solid diet, shorter postoperative stay but longer operating times. There was no difference in oncological outcomes.

Conclusion

LWR for suspected large gastric GIST is feasible and safe. It is associated with similar short-term outcomes with LWR for small tumors and favorable short-term outcomes over OWR for large tumors without compromising on oncological outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Connolly EM, Gaffney E, Reynolds JV (2003) Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 90:1178–1186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goh BK, Chow PK, Yap WM et al (2008) Which Is the optimal risk stratification system for surgically treated localized primary gist? comparison of three contemporary prognostic criteria in 171 tumors and a proposal for a modified armed forces institute of pathology risk criteria. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2153–2163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goh BK, Chow PK, Kesavan SM et al (2010) Outcome after curative resection of large (≥10 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: how frequent is adjacent organ involvement and is concomitant distal pancreatectomy necessary? J Gastrointest Surg 14:607–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chok AY, Goh BK, Koh YX et al (2015) Validation of the MSKCC gastrointestinal stromal tumor nomogram and comparison with other prognostication systems: single-institution experience with 289 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3597–3605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goh BK, Goh YC, Eng AK et al (2015) Outcome after laparoscopic versus open wedge resection for suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a matched-pair case–control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:905–910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goh BK, Chow PK, Chok AY et al (2010) Impact of the introduction of laparoscopic wedge resection as a surgical option for suspected small/medium-sized gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach on perioperative and oncologic outcomes. World J Surg 34:1847–1852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi SM, Kim MC, Jung GJ et al (2007) Laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric GIST: long-term follow-up results. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:444–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karakousis GC, Singer S, Zheng J et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a size-matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1599–1605

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liang JW, Zheng ZC, Zhang JJ et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:378–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koh YX, Chok AY, Zheng HL et al (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3549–3560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen K, Zhou YC, Mou YP et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Surg Endosc 29:355–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen QL, Pan Y, Cai JQ et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Onc 12:206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR et al (2010) NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8(Suppl 2):S1–S41 quiz S42-S44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (2014) ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(Suppl 3):21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Piessen G, Lefèvre JH, Cabau M et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg 262:831–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsiao CY, Yang CY, Lai IR et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): intermediate follow-up results. Surg Endosc 29:868–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin J, Huang C, Zheng C et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for larger than 5 cm primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a size-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 28:2577–2583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim KH, Kim MC, Jung GJ et al (2012) Long term survival results for gastric GIST: is laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GIST feasible? World J Surg Oncol 10:230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim HH (2015) Endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: advantages and hurdles. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:192

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Sing RF et al (2006) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg 243:738–747

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Masoni L, Gentili I, Maglio R et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection of large gastric GISTs: feasibility and long-term results. Surg Endosc 28:2905–2910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vogelaere KD, Loo IV, Peters O et al (2012) Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is safe and effective, irrespective of tumor size. Surg Endosc 26:2339–2345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kasetsermwiriya W, Nagai E, Nakata K et al (2014) Laparoscopic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor is feasible irrespective of tumor size. J Laparoendosc Adv S24:123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian K. P. Goh.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Chun Yuet Khoo, Brian K. P. Goh, Alvin K. H. Eng, Weng-Hoong Chan, Melissa C. C. Teo, Alexander Y. F. Chung, Hock-Soo Ong, and Wai-Keong Wong have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoo, C.Y., Goh, B.K.P., Eng, A.K.H. et al. Laparoscopic wedge resection for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Endosc 31, 2271–2279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5229-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5229-7

Keywords

Navigation