A systematic examination of preoperative surgery warm-up routines

Abstract

Background

Recent evidence indicates that a preoperative warm-up is a potentially useful tool in facilitating performance. But what factors drive such improvements and how should a warm-up be implemented?

Methods

In order to address these issues, we adopted a two-pronged approach: (1) we conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify existing studies utilising preoperative simulation techniques; (2) we performed task analysis to identify the constituent parts of effective warm-ups. We identified five randomised control trials, four randomised cross-over trials and four case series. The majority of these studies reviewed surgical performance following preoperative simulation relative to performance without simulation.

Results

Four studies reported outcome measures in real patients and the remainder reported simulated outcome measures. All but one of the studies found that preoperative simulation improves operative outcomes—but this improvement was not found across all measured parameters. While the reviewed studies had a number of methodological issues, the global data indicate that preoperative simulation has substantial potential to improve surgical performance. Analysis of the task characteristics of successful interventions indicated that the majority of these studies employed warm-ups that focused on the visual motor elements of surgery. However, there was no theoretical or empirical basis to inform the design of the intervention in any of these studies.

Conclusions

There is an urgent need for a more rigorous approach to the development of “warm-up” routines if the potential value of preoperative simulation is to be understood and realised. We propose that such interventions need to be grounded in theory and empirical evidence on human motor performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Catchpole K, Panesar SS, Russell J, Tang V, Hibbert P, Cleary K (2009) Surgical safety can be improved through better understanding of incidents reported to a national database. Nat Patient Safety Agency

  2. 2.

    White AD, Skelton M, Mushtaq F, Pike TW, Lodge JPA, Wilkie RM (2015) Inconsistent reporting of minimally invasive surgery errors. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2015.0038

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chalmers C, Joshi S, Bentley P, Boyle N (2010) The lost generation: impact of the 56-hour EWTD on current surgical training. Bull R Coll Surg Engl 92:102–106. doi:10.1308/147363510X491105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Independent Working Time Regulations Taskforce (2014) The implementation of the working time directive, and its impact on the NHS and health professionals

  5. 5.

    House of Commons Health Committee (2008) HC 25-I modernising medical careers third report of session 2007–08 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes

  6. 6.

    Healy N, Chang K, Conneely J, Malone C, Kerin M (2013) Impact of supervised training on the acquisition of simulated laparoscopic skills. Bull R Coll Surg Engl 95:1–6. doi:10.1308/003588413X13643054410340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ahmed N, Devitt KS, Keshet I, Spicer J, Imrie K, Feldman L, Cools-Lartigue J, Kayssi A, Lipsman N, Elmi M, Kulkarni AV, Parshuram C, Mainprize T, Warren RJ, Fata P, Gorman MS, Feinberg S, Rutka J (2014) A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery. Ann Surg 259:1041–1053. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000595

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    The Royal College of Surgeons of England (2009) Patient safety. RCSE, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    House of Commons Health Committee (2009) Patient safety: sixth report of session 2009-09, vol 1

  10. 10.

    Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, Cregan P, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ (2008) A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 248:166–179. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dawe SR, Pena GN, Windsor JA, Broeders JAJL, Cregan PC, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ (2014) Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training. Br J Surg 101:1063–1076. doi:10.1002/bjs.9482

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Abdalla G, Moran-Atkin E, Chen G, Schweitzer MA, Magnuson TH, Steele KE (2015) The effect of warm-up on surgical performance: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 29:1259–1269. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3811-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Moran-Atkin E, Abdalla G, Chen G, Magnuson TH, Lidor AO, Schweitzer MA, Steele KE (2015) Preoperative warm-up the key to improved resident technique: a randomized study. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 29:1057–1063. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3778-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    van Swieten LM, van Bergen E, Williams JHG, Wilson AD, Plumb MS, Kent SW, Mon-Williams MA (2010) A test of motor (not executive) planning in developmental coordination disorder and autism. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:493–499. doi:10.1037/a0017177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Diedrichsen J, Kornysheva K (2015) Motor skill learning between selection and execution. Trends Cogn Sci. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Calhoun VD, Eichele T, Adalı T, Allen EA (2012) Decomposing the brain: components and modes, networks and nodes. Trends Cogn Sci 16:255–256. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Freedman DJ, Assad J (2011) A proposed common neural mechanism for categorization and perceptual decisions. Nat Neurosci 14:143–146. doi:10.1038/nn.2740

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cohen MX, Ranganath C (2005) Behavioral and neural predictors of upcoming decisions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 5:117–126

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151(4):W65–W94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mills EJ, Chan A-W, Wu P, Vail A, Guyatt GH, Altman DG, Mills E, Kelly S, Wu P, Guyatt G, Louis T, Lavori P, Bailar J, Polansky M, Elbourne D, Altman D, Higgins J, Curtin F, Worthington H, Vail A, Maclure M, Brown B, Cleophas T, de Vogel E, Cleophas T, Daya S, Khan K, Daya S, Collins J, Walter S, Chan A, Altman D, Robinson K, Dickersin K, Altman D, Schulz K, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche P, Lang T, Jaynes ET, Schwartz J, Bugianesi K, Ebel D, De Smet M, Haesen R, Larson P, Powers J, Gooch W, Oddo L, Koutsoumbi P, Epanomeritakis E, Tsiaoussis J, Athanasakis H, Chrysos E, Zoras O, Vassilakis J, Xynos E, Turley E, McKeown A, Bonham M, Herrera D, Mayet L, Galindo M, Jung H, Kosoglou T, Salfi M, Lim J, Batra V, Cayen M, Affrime M, Lepore M, Pampanelli S, Fanelli C, Porcellati F, Di Vincenzo A, Cordoni C, Nakaishi H, Matsumoto H, Tominaga S, Hirayama M, Marathe P, Arnold M, Meeker J, Greene D, Barbhaiya R, Marx C, McIntosh E, Wilson W, McEvoy J, Holt S, Suder A, Dronfield C, Holt C, Beasley R, Fernhall B, Szymanksi L, Gorman P, Kamimori G, Kessler C, Schulz K, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D, Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D, Devereaux P, Choi P, El-Dika S, Bhandari M, Montori V, Schünemann H, Wallenstein S, Fisher A, Senn S, Senn S, Liu G, Liang K (2009) Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials. Trials 10:27. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-10-27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Weston MK, Stephens JH, Schafer A, Hewett PJ (2012) Warm-up before laparoscopic surgery is not essential. ANZ J Surg. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06321.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chen CCG, Green IC, Colbert-Getz JM, Steele K, Chou B, Lawson SM, Andersen DK, Satin AJ (2013) Warm-up on a simulator improves residents’ performance in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2066-2

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Plerhoples T, Zak Y, Hernandez-Boussard T, Lau J (2011) Another use of the mobile device: warm-up for laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res 170:185–188. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lendvay TS, Brand TC, White L, Kowalewski T, Jonnadula S, Mercer LD, Khorsand D, Andros J, Hannaford B, Satava RM (2013) Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Surg 216:1181–1192. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kroft J, Ordon M, Arthur R, Pittini R (2012) Does surgical “warming up” improve laparoscopic simulator performance? Simul Healthc 7:339–342. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31826230d4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Willaert WIM, Aggarwal R, Daruwalla F, Van Herzeele I, Darzi AW, Vermassen FE, Cheshire NJ (2012) Simulated procedure rehearsal is more effective than a preoperative generic warm-up for endovascular procedures. Ann Surg 255:1184–1189. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f9dbf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Osann KE, Winfield HN, Kahol K, McDougall EM (2012) Laparoscopic warm-up exercises improve performance of senior-level trainees during laparoscopic renal surgery. J Endourol 26:545–550. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0418

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Calatayud D, Arora S, Aggarwal R, Kruglikova I, Schulze S, Funch-Jensen P, Grantcharov T (2010) Warm-up in a virtual reality environment improves performance in the operating room. Ann Surg 251:1181–1185. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181deb630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Moldovanu R, Târcoveanu E, Dimofte G, Lupaşcu C, Bradea C (2011) Preoperative warm-up using a virtual reality simulator. JSLS 15:533–538. doi:10.4293/108680811X13176785204409

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rosser JC, Gentile DA, Hanigan K, Danner OK (2012) The effect of video game “warm-up” on performance of laparoscopic surgery tasks. JSLS 16:3–9. doi:10.4293/108680812X13291597715664

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Do AT, Cabbad MF, Kerr A, Serur E, Robertazzi RR, Stankovic MR (2006) A warm-up laparoscopic exercise improves the subsequent laparoscopic performance of Ob-Gyn residents: a low-cost laparoscopic trainer. JSLS 10:297–301

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kahol K, Satava RM, Ferrara J, Smith ML (2009) Effect of short-term pretrial practice on surgical proficiency in simulated environments: a randomized trial of the “preoperative warm-up” effect. J Am Coll Surg 208:255–268. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Arora S, Aggarwal R, Sirimanna P, Moran A, Grantcharov T, Kneebone R, Sevdalis N, Darzi A (2011) Mental practice enhances surgical technical skills: a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 253:265–270. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318207a789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175:482–487. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00080-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Malik I, Gaines P, Hamady M, Darzi A, Cheshire N, Vermassen F (2009) Validation of video-based skill assessment in carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Martin RCG, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM (2010) Laparoscopic hepatic lobectomy: advantages of a minimally invasive approach. J Am Coll Surg 210:627–634. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kundhal PS, Grantcharov TP (2009) Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room. Surg Endosc 23:645–649. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0043-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondré K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2005) A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 190:107–113. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Blencowe NS, McNair AGK, Davis CR, Brookes ST, Blazeby JM (2012) Standards of outcome reporting in surgical oncology: a case study in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:4012–4018. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2497-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Reznick RK (1993) Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 165:358–361. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80843-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Allen RJ, Waterman AH (2014) How does enactment affect the ability to follow instructions in working memory? Mem Cognit. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0481-3

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Körding KP, Wolpert DM, Kording KP (2006) Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cogn Sci 10:319–326. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Friston KJ, Daunizeau J, Kilner J, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ, Daunizeau J, Kilner J, Kiebel SJ (2010) Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation. Biol Cybern. doi:10.1007/s00422-010-0364-z

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Reyna VF, Estrada SM, DeMarinis JA, Myers RM, Stanisz JM, Mills BA (2011) Neurobiological and memory models of risky decision making in adolescents versus young adults. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 37:1125–1142. doi:10.1037/a0023943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wang X-J (2008) Decision making in recurrent neuronal circuits. Neuron 60:215–234. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.034

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Starcke K, Brand M (2012) Decision making under stress: a selective review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:1228–1248. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sanfey AG, Chang LJ (2008) Multiple systems in decision making. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1128:53–62. doi:10.1196/annals.1399.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rangel A, Camerer C, Montague PR (2008) A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:545–556. doi:10.1038/nrn2357

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Whistance RN, Forsythe RO, McNair AGK, Brookes ST, Avery KNL, Pullyblank AM, Sylvester PA, Jayne DG, Jones JE, Brown J, Coleman MG, Dutton SJ, Hackett R, Huxtable R, Kennedy RH, Morton D, Oliver A, Russell A, Thomas MG, Blazeby JM, Core Outcomes and iNformation SEts iN SUrgical Studies—ColoRectal Cancer Working Group (2013) A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 15:e548–e560. doi:10.1111/codi.12378

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Macefield RC, Boulind CE, Blazeby JM (2014) Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 399:263–272. doi:10.1007/s00423-013-1136-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Williamson PR, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Hirsch B, Califf R, Cheng S, Tasneem A, Horton J, Kirkham J, Gargon E, Clarke M, Williamson P, Miyar J, Adams C, Dwan K, Altman D, Arnaiz J, Bloom J, Chan A-W, Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Devane D, Sinha I, Jones L, Smyth R, Williamson P, Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Group P, Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Gotzsche P, Altman D, Mann H, Moher D, Schulz K, Simera I, Altman D, Kostanjsek N (2014) Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 9:e99111. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Al-Saud LM, Mushtaq F, Allsop MJ, Culmer PC, Mirghani I, Yates E, Keeling A, Mon-Williams MA, Manogue M (2016) Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator. Eur J Dent Educ. doi:10.1111/eje.12214

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Mushtaq.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Mr. T. W. Pike, Mr. S. Pathak, Dr. F. Mushtaq, Dr. R. M. Wilkie, Professor M. Mon-Williams and Professor J. P. A. Lodge have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pike, T.W., Pathak, S., Mushtaq, F. et al. A systematic examination of preoperative surgery warm-up routines. Surg Endosc 31, 2202–2214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5218-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Warm-up
  • Surgery
  • Preoperative simulation
  • Performance