Skip to main content
Log in

Take-home training in a simulation-based laparoscopy course

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Simulation training can prepare trainees for clinical practice in laparoscopic surgery. Training on box trainers allows for simulation training at home, which studies have shown to be a feasible method of training. However, little research has been conducted into how to make it a more efficient method of training. Our aim was to investigate how box trainers are used in take-home training to help guide the design of take-home training courses.

Methods

This study was designed using a mixed methods approach. Junior doctors participating in a laparoscopy curriculum, which included practising at home on box trainers, were invited. Quantitative data on training patterns was collected from logbooks. Qualitative data on the use of box trainers was retrieved from focus groups and individual interviews.

Results

From logbooks, we found that 14 out of 18 junior doctors mixed their training modalities, and four practised first on box trainers then on virtual reality simulators. Twelve practised only at home, while five practised at both places and one practised solely at the simulation centre. After a delayed start, most practised for some time, then had a period without training and then started training again towards the end of the course. We found that the themes of the interviews were: training method, training pattern, feedback and self-regulation. Participants identified the lack of feedback as challenging but described how self-rating provided direction during unsupervised training. Mandatory training elements affected when and how much participants practised.

Conclusions

When participants practised at home, they took an individualised approach to training. They mixed their training at home with training at the simulation centre. Participants practised at the beginning and towards the end of the course. Self-rating helped to guide unsupervised training where feedback was not accessible. Curricular requirements and testing determined when and how much participants practised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zendejas B, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA (2013) State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 257:586–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caban AM, Guido C, Silver M, Rossidis G, Sarosi G, Ben-David K (2013) Use of collapsible box trainer as a module for resident education. J Soc Laparoendo 17:440–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chummun K, Burke JP, O’Sullivan R, Prendiville W (2012) The influence of a ‘take home’ box trainer on laparoscopic performance for gynaecological surgeons. Gynecol Surg 9:303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi SA, Jamshidi R, O’Sullivan P, Palmer B, Hirose S, Stewart L, Kim EH (2011) Bringing the skills laboratory home: an affordable webcam-based personal trainer for developing laparoscopic skills. J Surg Educ 68:105–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kahol K, Leyba MJ, Deka M, Deka V, Mayes S, Smith M, Ferrara JJ, Panchanathan S (2008) Effect of fatigue on psychomotor and cognitive skills. Am J Surg 195:195–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zapf M, Ujiki M (2013) Surgical resident evaluations of portable laparoscopic box trainers. Surg Innov. doi:10.1177/1553350614535858, 11 June 2011

  7. van Empel PJ, Verdam MG, Strypet M, van Rijssen LB, Huirne JA, Scheele F, Bonjer HJ, Meijerink WJ (2012) Voluntary autonomous simulator based training in minimally invasive surgery, residents’ compliance and reflection. J Surg Educ 69:564–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Konge L, Ringsted C, Bjerrum F, Tolsgaard MG, Bitsch M, Sorensen JL, Schroeder TV (2015) The simulation centre at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. J Surg Educ 72:362–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bjerrum F, Sorensen JL, Thinggaard E, Strandbygaard J, Konge L (2015) Implementation of a cross-specialty training program in basic laparoscopy. JSLS. doi:10.4293/JSLS.2015.00059

  10. Thinggaard E, Bjerrum F, Strandbygaard J, Gogenur I, Konge L (2015) Validity of a cross-specialty test in basic laparoscopic techniques (TABLT). Br J Surg 102:1106–1113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Aggarwal R, Tully A, Sørensen JL, Dalsgaard T, Ottesen B (2006) Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc 20:1460–1466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bahsoun AN, Malik MM, Ahmed K, El-Hage O, Jaye P, Dasgupta P (2013) Tablet-based simulation provides a new solution to accessing laparoscopic skills training. J Surg Educ 70:161–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Korndorffer JR Jr, Bellows CF, Tekian A, Harris IB, Downing SM (2012) Effective home laparoscopic simulation training: a preliminary evaluation of an improved training paradigm. Am J Surg 203:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clevin L, Grantcharov TP (2008) Does box model training improve surgical dexterity and economy of movement during virtual reality laparoscopy? A randomised trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:99–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bjerrum F, Sorensen JL, Konge L, Rosthoj S, Lindschou J, Ottesen B, Strandbygaard J (2016) Randomized trial to examine procedure-to-procedure transfer in laparoscopic simulator training. Br J Surg 103:44–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA (2014) Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med 89:387–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Winkel P, Larsen CR, Ringsted C, Gluud C, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL (2013) Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 257:839–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra SL, Hawn MT (2009) Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches. J Surg Educ 66:201–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scott DJ, Ritter EM, Tesfay ST, Pimentel EA, Nagji A, Fried GM (2008) Certification pass rate of 100 % for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training. Surg Endosc 22:1887–1893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gandamihardja TA (2014) The role of communities of practice in surgical education. J Surg Educ 71:645–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Equipment was provided by Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Capital Region, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebbe Thinggaard.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs Ebbe Thinggaard and Ismail Gögenur report non-restricted educational grants from Johnson & Johnson during the conduct of the submitted work. Drs Lars Konge, Flemming Bjerrum, Jeanett Strandbygaard and Lene Spanager have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thinggaard, E., Konge, L., Bjerrum, F. et al. Take-home training in a simulation-based laparoscopy course. Surg Endosc 31, 1738–1745 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5166-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5166-5

Keywords

Navigation