Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 1342–1349 | Cite as

Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes

  • Anthony GonzalezEmail author
  • Ernesto Escobar
  • Rey Romero
  • Gail Walker
  • Jacqueline Mejias
  • Michelle Gallas
  • Eugene Dickens
  • Christopher J. Johnson
  • Jorge Rabaza
  • Omar Yusef Kudsi
Article

Abstract

Background

The open approach continues to be widely performed for ventral hernia repair, while the minimally invasive laparoscopic approach has grown adoption over the last decade. Recently, robotic operation was described as a new modality due to the ease for performing intracorporeal closure of the hernia defect. This study is one of the first multi-institutional case series evaluating robotic-assisted laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs, with the goal of describing robotic-assisted surgical techniques for ventral and incisional hernia repair and the outcomes in teaching and community hospital settings.

Methods

Medical records of consecutive patients (including surgeon’s learning curve cases) who underwent ventral or incisional hernia repair utilizing the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale CA) were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included preoperative history and perioperative outcomes.

Results

Data for a total of 368 patients from four institutions involving five surgeons were analyzed. They were predominantly females (60.3 %), and the mean age was 51 years. The majority of the patients were obese or morbidly obese (47.8 and 20.9 %), and 83.2 % of the patients had a history of prior abdominal operation. Conversion rate was 0.8 %, and mean length of stay was 1 day. Total postoperative complications rate up to 30 days was 8.4 %, of which incidence of paralytic ileus was 2.4 %.

Conclusion

This large case series of 368 patients demonstrates reproducibility of safety and performance associated with robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs performed by five surgeons at four institutions. In addition, the results of short term perioperative outcomes for surgeons during their early experience for robotic-assisted cases are in the range of what is reported in the existing published data on laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Further comparative evidence initiatives are being pursued to determine the benefits of robotic-assisted technique and technology for long-term and patient-reported outcomes.

Keywords

Ventral hernia Incisional hernia Robotic incisional hernia Robotic ventral hernia Laparoscopic hernia repair Open hernia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Monica Shah, MD, Intuitive Surgical for her support during study planning, execution, and the manuscript review.

Funding

This study was sponsored and funded by Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA, in association with the identified study investigators under a cooperative clinical trial agreement. The authors had full control of the study execution, analysis and development of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Rey Romero, MD, Ernesto Escobar, MD, Gail Walker, PhD, Michelle Gallas, PhD, and Jacqueline Mejias, CCRC received research support through the grant from Intuitive Surgical by their respective Institutions for this study. Anthony Gonzalez, MD is a consultant and has received research grants from Intuitive Surgical. He is a consultant with Ethicon. He is on the speaker bureau of Mallinkrodt Pharmaceuticals. He has also received research grants and participated in the scientific advisory board for Minimally Invasive Devices, Inc. Jorge Rabaza, MD is a proctor for Intuitive Surgical. Eugene Dickens, MD is a proctor and a consultant for Intuitive Surgical and a consultant for Medtronics. Omar Yusef Kudsi, MD, MBA, FACS is a Consultant for Intuitive Surgical and Medtronics. Christopher J. Johnson, DO, FACOS is a proctor and consultant for Intuitive Surgical.

References

  1. 1.
    Silecchia G, Campanile FC, Sanchez L, Ceccarelli G, Antinori A, Ansaloni L, Piccoli M (2015) Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected]. Surg Endosc 29(9):2463–2484. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4293-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klinge U, Conze J, Krones CJ, Schumpelick V (2005) Incisional hernia: open techniques. World J Surg 29(8):1066–1072. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7970-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    LeBlanc KA (2005) Incisional hernia repair: laparoscopic techniques. World J Surg 29(8):1073–1079. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7971-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liang MK, Subramanian A, Awad SS (2012) Laparoscopic transcutaneous closure of central defects in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 22(2):e66–e70. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182471fd2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J, Poi MJ, Novitsky YW (2011) Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using “shoelacing” technique. Surg Endosc 25(5):1452–1457. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1413-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonzalez AM, Romero RJ, Seetharamaiah R, Gallas M, Lamoureux J, Rabaza JR (2015) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary closure versus no primary closure of the defect: potential benefits of the robotic technology. Int J Med Robot 11(2):120–125. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1605 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colavita PD, Tsirline VB, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Belyansky I, Heniford BT (2013) Laparoscopic versus open hernia repair: outcomes and sociodemographic utilization results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Surg Endosc 27(1):109–117. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2432-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spaniolas K, Trus TL, Adrales GL (2014) Ventral hernia repairs in the oldest-old: high-risk regardless of approach. Surg Endosc 28(4):1230–1237. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3313-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hwang CS, Wichterman KA, Alfrey EJ (2009) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safer than open repair: analysis of the NSQIP data. J Surg Res 156(2):213–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.061 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mason RJ, Moazzez A, Sohn HJ, Berne TV, Katkhouda N (2011) Laparoscopic versus open anterior abdominal wall hernia repair: 30-day morbidity and mortality using the ACS-NSQIP database. Ann Surg 254(4):641–652. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823009e6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaoutzanis C, Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2013) Postoperative surgical site infections after ventral/incisional hernia repair: a comparison of open and laparoscopic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27(6):2221–2230. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2743-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee J, Mabardy A, Kermani R, Lopez M, Pecquex N, McCluney A (2013) Laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair in the era of obesity. JAMA Surg 148(8):723–726. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1395 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eker HH, Hansson BM, Bunnen M, Janssen IM, Pierik RE, Hop WC, Lange JF (2013) Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 148(3):259–263. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1466 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Brunt LM (2007) Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc 21(3):378–386. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9115-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ecker BL, Kuo LE, Simmons KD, Fischer JP, Morris JB, Kelz RR (2016) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: longitudinal outcomes and cost analysis using statewide claims data. Surg Endosc 30(3):906–915. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4310-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sains PS, Tilney HS, Purkayastha S, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP, Heriot AG (2006) Outcomes following laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional hernia. World J Surg 30(11):2056–2064. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0026-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carter SA, Hicks SC, Brahmbhatt R, Liang MK (2014) Recurrence and pseudorecurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: predictors and patient-focused outcomes. Am Surg 80(2):138–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Askenasy EP, Kao LS, Liang MK (2014) Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. World J Surg 38(12):3097–3104. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2722-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tse GH, Stutchfield BM, Duckworth AD, de Beaux AC, Tulloh B (2010) Pseudo-recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Hernia 14(6):583–587. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0709-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schoenmaeckers EJ, Wassenaar EB, Raymakers JT, Rakic S (2010) Bulging of the mesh after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias. Jsls 14(4):541–546. doi: 10.4293/108680810x12924466008240 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anadol AZ, Akin M, Kurukahvecioglu O, Tezel E, Ersoy E (2011) Comparison of laparoscopic primary and open primary repair of ventral hernias. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 21(5):301–305. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182245d61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL, Manjarrez A (2004) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an 11-year experience. Hernia 8(1):23–27. doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0163-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pearson DG, Madura JA (2016) Modified retrorectus ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 211(3):615–618. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.11.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ballantyne GH, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83(6):1293–1304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Allison N, Tieu K, Snyder B, Pigazzi A, Wilson E (2012) Technical feasibility of robot-assisted ventral hernia repair. World J Surg 36(2):447–452. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1389-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vorst AL, Kaoutzanis C, Carbonell AM, Franz MG (2015) Evolution and advances in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. World J Gastrointest Surg 7(11):293–305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Itani KM, Hur K, Kim LT, Anthony T, Berger DH, Reda D, Neumayer L (2010) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 145(4):322–328. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.18 (discussion 328) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Askenasy EP, Kao LS, Liang MK (2014) Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. World J Surg 38(12):3097–3104. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2722-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Kingsnorth A (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Gonzalez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ernesto Escobar
    • 1
  • Rey Romero
    • 1
  • Gail Walker
    • 2
  • Jacqueline Mejias
    • 2
  • Michelle Gallas
    • 2
  • Eugene Dickens
    • 3
  • Christopher J. Johnson
    • 4
  • Jorge Rabaza
    • 1
  • Omar Yusef Kudsi
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of General and Bariatric SurgeryBaptist Health South FloridaMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Population Health and Outcomes Research, Center for Research and GrantsBaptist Health South FloridaMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Hillcrest Medical Center and Oklahoma Physician GroupTulsaUSA
  4. 4.Mid-Florida Surgical AssociatesClermontUSA
  5. 5.Steward Good Samaritan Medical CenterBrocktonUSA

Personalised recommendations