Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in patients with chronic liver disease

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous studies demonstrated laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) to be associated with fewer short-term complications than open ventral hernia repair (OVHR). Little literature is available comparing LVHR and OVHR in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients.

Methods

Patients with model for end-stage liver disease score ≥9 who underwent elective ventral hernia repair in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database were included. 30-day outcomes were compared between LVHR and OVHR after adjusting for hernia disease severity, baseline comorbidities and demographic factors.

Results

A total of 3594 ventral hernia repairs were included, 536 (14.9 %) of which were LVHR. After adjusting for other confounders, LVHR was associated with a lower incidence of wound-related complications (0.23, 95 % CI 0.07–0.74, p = 0.01), shorter length of stay (mean 3.7 vs. 5.0 days, p < 0.01) than OVHR, but similar systemic complications (p = 0.77), bleeding complications (p = 0.69), unplanned reoperation (p = 0.74) or readmission (p = 0.40). Propensity score-matched comparison showed similar conclusions. Five hundred and sixty-two patients had ascites, among whom 35 (6.2 %) underwent LVHR. In this subcohort, LVHR was associated with higher mortality (OR 5.36, 95 % CI 1.00–28.60, p = 0.05), systemic complications (OR 7.03, 95 % CI 2.06–24.00, p < 0.01), and unplanned reoperation (OR 6.03, 95 % CI 1.51–24.12, p = 0.01) than OVHR.

Conclusions

In comparison with OVHR, LVHR is associated with similar short-term outcomes except for lower wound-related complications and shorter length of stay in CLD patients. However, when patients have ascites, LVHR is associated with higher mortality, systemic complications, and unplanned reoperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gray SH, Vick CC, Graham LA, Finan KR, Neumayer LA, Hawn MT (2008) Umbilical herniorrhapy in cirrhosis: improved outcomes with elective repair. J Gastrointest Surg 12(4):675–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carbonell AM, Wolfe LG, DeMaria EJ (2005) Poor outcomes in cirrhosis-associated hernia repair: a nationwide cohort study of 32,033 patients. Hernia 9(4):353–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McKay A, Dixon E, Bathe O, Sutherland F (2009) Umbilical hernia repair in the presence of cirrhosis and ascites: results of a survey and review of the literature. Hernia 13(5):461–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Brunt LM (2007) Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc 21(3):378–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang MK, Berger RL, Li LT, Davila JA, Hicks SC, Kao LS (2013) Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias. JAMA Surg 148(11):1043–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar D, Khan H, Qureshi MS (2015) Outcome of four years experience in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Pak J Med Sci 31(4):987–990

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ecker BL, Kuo LE, Simmons KD, Fischer JP, Morris JB, Kelz RR (2016) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: longitudinal outcomes and cost analysis using statewide claims data. Surg Endosc 30(3):906–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Misiakos EP, Machairas A, Patapis P, Liakakos T (2008) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: pros and cons compared with open hernia repair. JSLS 12(2):117–125

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Al Chalabi H, Larkin J, Mehigan B, McCormick P (2015) A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 20:65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Meara L, Ahmad SB, Glaser J, Diaz JJ, Bruns BR (2015) Outcomes of primary fascial closure after open abdomen for nontrauma emergency general surgery patients. Am J Surg 210(6):1126–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suwa K, Okamoto T, Yanaga K (2016) Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature. Surg Today 46(7):764–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LeBlanc K (2016) Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Hernia 20(1):85–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawlak M, Hilgers RD, Bury K, Lehmann A, Owczuk R, Smietanski M (2016) Comparison of two different concepts of mesh and fixation technique in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 30(3):1188–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gangura AG, Palade RS (2014) Tactical and surgical techniques issues in the surgical treatment of incisional hernias. J Med Life 7(3):428–432

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Belghiti J, Durand F (1997) Abdominal wall hernias in the setting of cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis 17(3):219–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loriau J, Manaouil D, Mauvais F (2002) Management of umbilical hernia in cirrhotic patients. J Chir (Paris) 139(3):135–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cobb WS, Heniford BT, Burns JM, Carbonell AM, Matthews BD, Kercher KW (2005) Cirrhosis is not a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19(3):418–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen KT, Kitisin K, Steel J, Jeyabalan G, Aggarwal S, Geller DA et al (2011) Cirrhosis is not a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results and practical recommendations. HPB (Oxford) 13(3):192–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY (2010) Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg 44:251–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau TM, Kosberg CL et al (2001) A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 33(2):464–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, Harper A, Kim R, Kamath P et al (2003) Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology 124(1):91–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Geneletti S, Richardson S, Best N (2009) Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies. Biostatistics 10(1):17–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17(19):2265–2281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hwang CS, Wichterman KA, Alfrey EJ (2009) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safer than open repair: analysis of the NSQIP data. J Surg Res 156(2):213–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Regner JL, Mrdutt MM, Munoz-Maldonado Y (2015) Tailoring surgical approach for elective ventral hernia repair based on obesity and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program outcomes. Am J Surg 210(6):1024–9 (discussion 1029–30)

  27. Witherspoon P, O’Dwyer PJ (2005) Surgeon perspectives on options for ventral abdominal wall hernia repair: results of a postal questionnaire. Hernia 9(3):259–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pedersen JS, Bendtsen F, Moller S (2015) Management of cirrhotic ascites. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 6(3):124–137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bhangui P, Laurent A, Amathieu R, Azoulay D (2012) Assessment of risk for non-hepatic surgery in cirrhotic patients. J Hepatol 57(4):874–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pisani CA, Cordovana A, Pinto A, Spina GP (2000) Surgery in the cirrhotic patient. Prognosis and risk factors. Minerva Chir 55(11):771–778

    Google Scholar 

  31. Douard R, Lentschener C, Ozier Y, Dousset B (2009) Operative risks of digestive surgery in cirrhotic patients. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 33(6–7):555–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Concha PM, Mertz KV (2010) Perioperative risk among patients with cirrhosis. Rev Med Chil 138(9):1165–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Andraus W, Pinheiro RS, Lai Q, Haddad LB, Nacif LS, D’Albuquerque LA et al (2015) Abdominal wall hernia in cirrhotic patients: emergency surgery results in higher morbidity and mortality. BMC Surg 15:65

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mason RJ, Moazzez A, Sohn HJ, Berne TV, Katkhouda N (2011) Laparoscopic versus open anterior abdominal wall hernia repair: 30-day morbidity and mortality using the ACS-NSQIP database. Ann Surg 254(4):641–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aher CV, Kubasiak JC, Daly SC, Janssen I, Deziel DJ, Millikan KW et al (2015) The utilization of laparoscopy in ventral hernia repair: an update of outcomes analysis using ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc 29(5):1099–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fekkes JF, Velanovich V (2015) Amelioration of the effects of obesity on short-term postoperative complications of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25(2):151–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Savitch SL, Shah PC (2015) Closing the gap between the laparoscopic and open approaches to abdominal wall hernia repair: a trend and outcomes analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4650-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hofmann WP, Radle J, Moench C, Bechstein W, Zeuzem S (2008) Prediction of perioperative mortality in patients with advanced liver disease and abdominal surgery by the use of different scoring systems and tests. Z Gastroenterol 46(11):1283–1289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis GV, Vangeli M, Terreni N, Patch D, Burroughs AK (2005) Systematic review: the model for end-stage liver disease–should it replace Child-Pugh’s classification for assessing prognosis in cirrhosis? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 22(11–12):1079–1089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Adogwa O, Martin JR, Huang K, Verla T, Fatemi P, Thompson P et al (2014) Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of postoperative complication after spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(18):1513–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bohl DD, Shen MR, Kayupov E, Della Valle CJ (2016) Hypoalbuminemia independently predicts surgical site infection, pneumonia, length of stay, and readmission after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(1):15–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee EH, Baek SH, Chin JH, Choi DK, Son HJ, Kim WJ et al (2012) Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is a major risk factor for acute kidney injury following off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Intensive Care Med 38(9):1478–1486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kato TS, Kitada S, Yang J, Wu C, Takayama H, Naka Y et al (2013) Relation of preoperative serum albumin levels to survival in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation. Am J Cardiol 112(9):1484–1488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Uppal S, Al-Niaimi A, Rice LW, Rose SL, Kushner DM, Spencer RJ et al (2013) Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is an independent predictor of poor perioperative outcomes in women undergoing open surgery for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 131(2):416–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hwang G, Hanna MH, Phelan MJ, Carmichael JC, Mills SD et al (2015) Even modest hypoalbuminemia affects outcomes of colorectal surgery patients. Am J Surg 210(2):276–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chai FY, Jiffre D (2011) Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is an independent risk factor for the development of surgical site infection following gastrointestinal surgery. Ann Surg 254(4):665 (author reply 665–666)

  47. Klink CD, Binnebosel M, Lucas AH, Schachtrupp A, Grommes J, Conze J et al (2011) Serum analyses for protein, albumin and IL-1-RA serve as reliable predictors for seroma formation after incisional hernia repair. Hernia 15(1):69–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kaoutzanis C, Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, Lampman RM, Wahl WL et al (2015) Risk factors for postoperative wound infections and prolonged hospitalization after ventral/incisional hernia repair. Hernia 19(1):113–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dietz UA, Winkler MS, Hartel RW, Fleischhacker A, Wiegering A, Isbert C et al (2014) Importance of recurrence rating, morphology, hernial gap size, and risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia classification. Hernia 18(1):19–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yen-Yi Juo.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Juo, Skancke, Holzmacher, Amdur, Lin, and Vaziri have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Juo, YY., Skancke, M., Holzmacher, J. et al. Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in patients with chronic liver disease. Surg Endosc 31, 769–777 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5031-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5031-6

Keywords

Navigation