Skip to main content

Table 8 Multivariable analysis of recurrence

From: Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair?

Parameter p value Category p value paired comparison OR estimate 95 % CI
BMI (5-point OR) 0.004    1.342 1.098 1.640
EHS classification medial 0.022 Yes versus no   1.690 1.077 2.652
Caseload per surgeon and year 0.023 <25 versus ≥25   1.494 1.056 2.115
ASA score 0.090 I versus II 0.195 0.758 0.498 1.152
   I versus III/IV 0.028 0.510 0.279 0.931
   II versus III/IV 0.103 0.673 0.418 1.083
EHS classification scrotal 0.173 Yes versus no   1.779 0.777 4.073
Age (10-year OR) 0.342    0.940 0.828 1.068
Defect size 0.532 I versus II 0.315 1.273 0.795 2.039
   I versus III 0.724 1.105 0.636 1.921
   II versus III 0.488 0.868 0.581 1.296
EHS classification femoral 0.735 Yes versus no   1.221 0.383 3.894
EHS classification lateral 0.777 Yes versus no   0.935 0.586 1.491
Risk factors 0.996 Yes versus no   1.001 0.680 1.474