Skip to main content

Table 7 Multivariable analysis of postoperative complications

From: Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair?

Parameter p value Category p value paired comparison OR estimate 95 % CI
Caseload per surgeon and year <.001 <25 versus ≥ 25   0.463 0.388 0.554
EHS classification lateral <.001 Yes versus no   0.471 0.350 0.633
BMI (5-point OR) <.001    0.746 0.649 0.858
EHS classification scrotal <.001 Yes versus no   2.076 1.444 2.984
EHS classification medial <.001 Yes versus no   0.566 0.423 0.758
Age (10-year OR) 0.002    1.114 1.041 1.192
Defect size 0.010 I versus II 0.032 0.700 0.505 0.970
   I versus III 0.003 0.580 0.406 0.830
   II versus III 0.072 0.829 0.676 1.017
ASA score 0.092 I versus II 0.764 1.035 0.827 1.295
   I versus III/IV 0.135 0.786 0.573 1.078
   II versus III/IV 0.029 0.759 0.593 0.972
Risk factors 0.761 Yes versus no   1.033 0.838 1.273
EHS classification femoral 0.990 Yes versus no   0.996 0.516 1.921