Skip to main content

Table 11 Multivariable analysis of pain requiring treatment

From: Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair?

Parameter p value Category p value paired OR estimate 95 % CI
Defect size <.001 I versus II <.001 2.084 1.642 2.644
   I versus III <.001 2.567 1.832 3.597
   II versus III 0.162 1.232 0.919 1.651
Age (10-year OR) <.001    0.810 0.752 0.872
BMI (5-point OR) <.001    1.339 1.183 1.516
ASA score 0.095 I versus II 0.199 0.855 0.673 1.086
   I versus III/IV 0.030 0.652 0.442 0.960
   II versus III/IV 0.105 0.762 0.549 1.059
Risk factors 0.144 Yes versus no   1.192 0.942 1.509
Operation (OR/year) 0.326 <25 versus ≥25   1.108 0.903 1.361
EHS classification femoral 0.352 Yes versus no   1.386 0.698 2.752
EHS classification lateral 0.389 Yes versus no   1.159 0.828 1.622
EHS classification scrotal 0.633 Yes versus no   1.170 0.615 2.225
EHS classification medial 0.964 Yes versus no   1.007 0.746 1.359