Skip to main content

Table 10 Multivariable analysis of pain on exertion

From: Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair?

Parameter p value Category p value paired comparison OR estimate 95 % CI
Age (10-year OR) <.001    0.772 0.741 0.804
Defect size <.001 I versus II <.001 1.358 1.173 1.572
   I versus III <.001 1.673 1.376 2.035
   II versus III 0.009 1.232 1.053 1.443
BMI (5-point OR) <.001    1.179 1.092 1.272
Caseload per surgeon and year 0.003 <25 versus ≥25   1.191 1.062 1.337
ASA score 0.086 I versus II 0.036 0.869 0.761 0.991
   I versus III/IV 0.097 0.823 0.655 1.036
   II versus III/IV 0.600 0.948 0.777 1.157
Risk factors 0.168 Yes versus np   1.100 0.961 1.259
EHS classification medial 0.547 Yes versus no   1.053 0.890 1.247
EHS classification femoral 0.719 Yes versus no   1.082 0.703 1.666
EHS classification lateral 0.854 Yes versus no   1.018 0.845 1.226
EHS classification scrotal 0.951 Yes versus no   1.012 0.696 1.472