Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 9, pp 3808–3815 | Cite as

Single-incision flexible endoscopy (SIFE) for detection and staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis

  • Haythem NajahEmail author
  • Réa Lo Dico
  • Marion Grienay
  • Anthony Dohan
  • Xavier Dray
  • Marc Pocard
Article

Abstract

Objective

To show the feasibility and the safety of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) evaluation by single-incision flexible endoscopy (SIFE) and to compare it to single-incision rigid endoscopy (SIRE).

Background

Direct peritoneal visualization, either by laparotomy or laparoscopy, continues to be the gold standard in diagnosing PC. We reported, in animal study, that combining single-incision laparoscopic surgery and flexible endoscopy improved evaluation of the peritoneal cavity in a live porcine model and in four human cadavers.

Methods

Patients, undergoing surgical exploration for diagnosis and staging of PC, were included in a prospective study. Using a superiority design a sample size of 47 patients was determined. Through a single incision, a standardized peritoneoscopy was conducted with rigid (SIRE) and with flexible endoscope (SIFE). Primary outcome was the access success rates for the 13 regions of the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI).

Results

Overall access to the 13 regions of PCI was successful in 83 % of the cases with SIRE and in 91.1 % with SIFE (p < 10−10). SIFE access rates were superior to SIREs’ in the regions: R1 (87.2 vs. 61.7 %, p = 0.002), R2 (87.2 vs. 66 %, p = 0.004), R3 (85.1 vs. 59.6 %, p = 0.001) and R6 (80.9 vs. 61.7 %, p = 0.008). The mean PCI was higher (p < 104) with SIFE 12.77 (±11.97) than with SIRE 11.77 (±11.63).

Conclusion

This prospective, comparative study shows that SIFE was significantly superior to SIRE in the exploration of some difficult-to-access peritoneal areas, located in regions 1, 2, 3 and 6. These two minimally invasive staging procedures are safe, feasible and have to be seen as complementary rather than competing.

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgery Single-incision laparoscopic surgery Peritoneal carcinomatosis Peritoneoscopy Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Fujifilm Medical System Company paid the inscription and the travel to the «United European Gastroenterology Week» which took place in Stockholm in October 2011. Two members of the team were present for poster presentation (Drs. R. Lo Dico and Dr. X. Dray). It is also a partner to the INSERM U965 Unit to study impact of endoscopy on evaluation of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Drs. M. Grienay, A. Dohan, H. Najah and M. Pocard have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Verwaal VJ, Van Ruth S, De Bree E, Van Sloothen GW, Van Tinteren H, Boot H, Zoetmulder FA (2003) Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:3737–3743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao C, Yan TD, Black D, Morris DL (2009) A systematic review and meta-analysis of cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2152–2165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glehen O, Kwiatkowski F, Sugarbaker PH, Elias D, Levine EA, De Simone M, Barone R, Yonemura Y, Cavaliere F, Quenet F, Gutman M, Tentes AA, Lorimier G, Bernard JL, Bereder JM, Porcheron J, Gomez-Portilla A, Shen P, Deraco M, Rat P (2004) Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Clin Oncol 22:3284–3292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glehen O, Osinsky D, Cotte E, Kwiatkowski F, Freyer G, Isaac S, Trillet-Lenoir V, Sayag-Beaujard AC, François Y, Vignal J, Gilly FN (2003) Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia using a closed abdominal procedure and cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: morbidity and mortality analysis of 216 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg Oncol 10:863–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elias D, Gilly F, Glehen O (2008) Présentation du rapport de l’AFC. In: Arnette ED (ed) Carcinoses péritonéales d’origine digestive et primitive. Association Française de chirurgie, Paris, p 680Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elias D, Gilly F, Boutitie F, Quenet F, Bereder JM, Mansvelt B, Lorimier G, Dube P, Glehen O (2010) Peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis treated with surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of 523 patients from a multicentric French study. J Clin Oncol 28:63–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dromain C, Leboulleux S, Auperin A, Goere D, Malka D, Lumbroso J, Schumberger M, Sigal R, Elias D (2008) Staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis: enhanced CT vs PET/CT. Abdom Imaging 33:87–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yan TD, Morris DL, Shigeki K, Dario B, Marcello D (2008) Preoperative investigations in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: expert consensus statement. J Surg Oncol 98:224–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Angelelli G, Ianora AA, Scardapane A, Pedote P, Memeo M, Rotondo A (2001) Role of computerized tomography in the staging of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Semin Surg Oncol 20:109–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Bree E, Koops W, Kroger R, Van Ruth S, Verwaal VJ, Zoetmulder FA (2006) Preoperative computed tomography and selection of patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:65–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cotte E, Passot G, Gilly F, Glehen O (2010) Selection of patients and staging of peritoneal surface malignancies. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2:31–35CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valle M, Garofalo A (2006) Laparoscopic staging of peritoneal surface malignancies. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:625–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brun JL, Rouzier R, Uzan S, Darai E (2008) External validation of a laparoscopic-based score to evaluate resectability of advanced ovarian cancers: clues for a simplified score. Gynecol Oncol 110:354–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Fanfani F, Ercoli A, Lorusso D, Rossi M, Scambia G (2006) A laparoscopy-based score to predict surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1156–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deffieux X, Castaigne D, Pomel C (2006) Role of laparoscopy to evaluate candidates for complete cytoreduction in advanced stages of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:35–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yan T, Sugarbaker P (2008) Rectus abdominis muscle resection for abdominal wall recurrence of mucinous adenocarcinoma or peritoneal mesothelioma. Tumori 94:309–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ziprin P, Ridgway PF, Peck DH, Darzi AW (2002) The theories and realities of port-site metastases: a critical appraisal. J Am Coll Surg 195:395–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nunez MF, Sardi A, Jimenez W, Nieroda C, Sitting M, MacDonald R, Aydin N, Milovanov V, Gushchin V (2015) Port site metastases is an independent prognosis factor in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1267–1273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pocard M (2015) Exploratory laparoscopy for carcinomatosis: discard that quiver full of trocars and use just one. J Visc Surg 152:147–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nunez MF, Sardi A, Nieroda C, Jimenez W, Sitting M, MacDonald R, Aydin N, Milovanov V, Gushcin V (2015) Morbidity of abdominal wall resection and reconstruction after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1658–1663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ladjici Y, Dray X, Marteau P, Valleur P, Pocard M (2012) Flexible versus rigid single-port peritoneoscopy: a randomized controlled trial in a live porcine model followed by initial experience in human cadavers. Surg Endosc 26:2651–2657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. In: Sugarbaker PH (ed) Peritoneal carcinomatosis: principles of management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coccolini F, Gheza F, Lotti M, Virzì S, Iusco D, Ghermandi C, Melotti R, Baiocchi G, Giulini SM, Ansaloni L, Catena F (2013) Peritoneal carcinomatosis. World J Gastroenterol 19:6979–6994CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Valle M, Garofalo A (2006) Laparoscopic staging of peritoneal malignancies. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:625–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pomel C, Appleyard T, Gouy S, Rouzier R, Elias D (2005) The role of laparoscopy to evaluate candidates for complete cytoreduction of peritoneal carcinomatosis and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:540–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elias D, Goéré D, Pietrantonio Di, Boige V, Malka D, Kohneh-Shahri N, Dromain C, Ducreux M (2008) Results of systematic second-look surgery in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg 247:445–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Froghi F, Sodergen M, Darzi A, Paraskeva P (2010) Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in general surgery: a review of current practice. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:191–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Erbella JJ, Bunch G (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients. Surg Endosc 24:1958–1961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH (2009) Early experience with single incision transumbilical laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using the SILS Port. Int J Surg 7:456–459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gaujoux S, Bretagnol F, Ferron M, Panis Y (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Colorectal Dis 13:1066–1071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gandhi DP, Ragupathi M, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2010) Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1875–1880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical endoscopic appendectomy in humans: on the road to NOTES: a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:579–582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique. Endoscopy 40:428–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee CH, Jeon WJ, Youn SJ, Yun HY, Jang LC, Choi JW, Song YJ, Ryu DH (2014) The experience of transumbilical endoscopic appendicectomies. Ann Surg Treat Res 86:278–282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Elias DM, Pocard M (2003) Treatment and prevention of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 12:543–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sugarbaker PH (1999) Successful management of microscopic residual disease in large bowel cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 43(Suppl):S15–S25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ladjici Y, Pocard M, Marteau P, Valleur P (2012) No-incision (NOTES) versus single-incision (single-port) surgery for access to sites of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a back-to-back animal study. Surg Endosc 26:2658–2666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Voermans RP, Sheppard B, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Fockens P, Faigel DO (2009) Comparison of transgastric NOTES and laparoscopic peritoneoscopy for detection of peritoneal metastases. Ann Surg 250:255–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Matsui Y, Ryota H, Sakaguchi T, Nakatani K, Matsushima H, Yamaki S, Hirooka S, Yamamoto T, Kwon AH (2014) Comparison of a flexible-tip laparoscope with a rigid straight laparoscope for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 80:1245–1249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Petersen BT, Chennat J, Cohen J, Cotton PB, Greenwald DA, Kowalski TE, Krinsky ML, Park WG, Pike IM, Romagnuolo J, Rutala WA (2011) Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1075–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Garofalo A, Valle M (2009) Laparoscopy in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer J 15(3):190–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Esquivel J, Farinetti A, Sugarbaker PH (1999) Elective surgery in recurrent colon cancer with peritoneal seeding: when to and when not to proceed. G Chir 20:81–86PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haythem Najah
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Réa Lo Dico
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marion Grienay
    • 3
  • Anthony Dohan
    • 2
    • 4
  • Xavier Dray
    • 5
  • Marc Pocard
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Oncologic and Digestive SurgeryHôpital Lariboisière-AP-HPParis Cedex 10France
  2. 2.Sorbonne Paris Cité, CART, INSERM U965Université Paris DiderotParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of AnesthesiologyHôpital Lariboisière-AP-HPParis Cedex 10France
  4. 4.Department of Abdominal ImagingHôpital Lariboisière-AP-HPParis Cedex 10France
  5. 5.Department of GastroenterologyHôpital Lariboisière-AP-HPParis Cedex 10France

Personalised recommendations