Skip to main content
Log in

Resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As clinical outcome data are increasingly tied to hospital reimbursement, balancing quality care with training of surgical residents has become critical. We used the ACS-NSQIP database to determine impact of resident participation in laparoscopic gastric bypass on 30-day morbidity and mortality.

Methods

We queried the ACS-NSQIP database from 1/2005 to 12/2012 for laparoscopic gastric bypass, dividing cases between those with or without resident involvement. Univariate and multivariate analyses of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed. A sub-analysis was performed to address whether different resident training levels affected outcomes.

Results

A total of 43,477 laparoscopic gastric bypass cases were available for analysis; 22,189 had resident involvement (resident = R), and 21,288 did not (no resident = NR). Preoperative characteristics were similar between groups. On multivariate analysis, procedures with resident assistance had increased risk of the following complications: superficial site infection (R = 2.1 vs. 1.5 %, p < 0.001), renal failure (R = 0.4 vs. NR = 0.3 %, p = 0.002), urinary tract infection (R = 1.1 vs. 0.9 %, p = 0.027), and sepsis (R = 0.8 vs. NR = 0.6 %, p = 0.019). Increased operative time in the resident group (29 min, p < 0.0001) demonstrated direct linear association with resident trainee level. There was no statistical difference in the incidences of the following: pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, deep surgical site infection, organ space infection, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, mechanical ventilation >48 h, septic shock, cardiac arrest, return to the operating room, or mortality.

Conclusion

Resident participation in laparoscopic gastric bypass was associated with statistically significant, but clinically insignificant increase in incidence of superficial site infection, renal failure, readmission rate, and length of stay. Therefore, although resident participation in laparoscopic gastric bypass is associated with significantly increased operative time, it does not lead to increased mortality and has no clinically significant effect on morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wheeler HB (1993) Myth and reality in general surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg 78:21–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, Jeyarajah DR, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Wexner SD, Martinez JM, Ross SB, Awad MM, Franklin ME, Arregui ME, Schirmer BD, Minter RM (2013) General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 258:440–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. CMS Manual System (2006) https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/downloads/r811cp.pdf

  4. Igwe E, Hernandez E, Rose S, Uppal S (2014) Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 211(484):e1–e7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis SS Jr, Husain FA, Lin E, Nandipati KC, Perez S, Sweeney JF (2013) Resident participation in index laparoscopic general surgical cases: impact of the learning environment on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 216:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Advani V, Ahad S, Gonczy C, Markwell S, Hassan I (2012) Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP. Am J Surg 203:347–351 (discussion 351–352)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gorgun E, Benlice C, Corrao E, Hammel J, Isik O, Hull T, Remzi FH (2014) Outcomes associated with resident involvement in laparoscopic colorectal surgery suggest a need for earlier and more intensive resident training. Surgery 156:825–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ross SW, Oommen B, Kim M, Walters AL, Green JM, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA (2014) A little slower, but just as good: postgraduate year resident versus attending outcomes in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 28:3092–3100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krell RW, Birkmeyer NJ, Reames BN, Carlin AM, Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, Collaborative Michigan Bariatric Surgery (2014) Effects of resident involvement on complication rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 218:253–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, Zhou L, Huffman K, Wang X, Liu Y, Kraemer K, Meng X, Merkow R, Chow W, Matel B, Richards K, Hart AJ, Dimick JB, Hall BL (2013) Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg 217(336–46):e1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tseng WH, Jin L, Canter RJ, Martinez SR, Khatri VP, Gauvin J, Bold RJ, Wisner D, Taylor S, Chen SL (2011) Surgical resident involvement is safe for common elective general surgery procedures. J Am Coll Surg 213:19–26 (discussion 26–28)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iordens GI, Klaassen RA, van Lieshout EM, Cleffken BI, van der Harst E (2012) How to train surgical residents to perform laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safely. World J Surg 36:2003–2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fanous M, Carlin A (2012) Surgical resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass: is it safe? Surgery 152:21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium, Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, Wahed AS, Berk P, Chapman W, Pories W, Courcoulas A, McCloskey C, Mitchell J, Patterson E, Pomp A, Staten MA, Yanovski SZ, Thirlby R, Wolfe B (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361:445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao Y, Encinosa W (2007) Statistical Brief #23: Bariatric surgery utilization and outcomes in 1998 and 2004. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb23.jsp

  16. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Fact Sheet (2013). https://asmbs.org/wp/uploads/2014/05/Metabolic+Bariatric-Surgery.pdf

  17. Finks JF, Carlin A, Share D, O’Reilly A, Fan Z, Birkmeyer J, Birkmeyer N, Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative from the Michigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research Evaluation (2011) Effect of surgical techniques on clinical outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass–results from the Michigan Bariatric surgery collaborative. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:284–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parina RP, Chang DC, Rose JA, Talamini MA (2015) Is a low readmission rate indicative of a good hospital? J Am Coll Surg 220:169–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Etzioni DA, Wasif N, Dueck AC, Cima RR, Hohmann SF, Naessens JM, Mathur AK, Habermann EB (2015) Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality. JAMA 313(5):505–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Doyon would like to thank the Foundation for Surgical Fellowships for partial funding of her fellowship position.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Doyon.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Alejandro Moreno-Koehler and Drs. Doyon, Nepomnayshy, Ricciardi have no conflict of interest or other financial disclosures related to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doyon, L., Moreno-Koehler, A., Ricciardi, R. et al. Resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 30, 3216–3224 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4627-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4627-6

Keywords

Navigation