Abstract
Introduction
Technological advances have brought about robotic single-site (RSS) cholecystectomy and hysterectomy. The application of RSS to additional procedures requires careful assessment of the surgeon learning curve, the technological limitations, patient selection criteria and associated outcomes.
Methods
Patient demographics, BMI, surgical indications, adrenal size, OR times, length of stay, postoperative pain and complications were assessed.
Results
Thirty-three patients underwent RSS-A by a single surgeon with 53 % being male, mean age 54 ± 16 years and mean BMI of 32.7. There were 18 left, 10 right, and 5 bilateral procedures for a total of 38 adrenal glands removed (mean tumor size 3.2 cm). There were 5 conversions to a laparoscopic approach, and two to open approach. The necessity for conversion was not associated with age, BMI, tumor size, surgical side or pathology (p > 0.05). The patients who underwent successful unilateral RSS-A had a profile of mean age 55, BMI 31, tumor size 3 cm, and a mean operative time of 118 ± 25.8 min. Pain scores were <4 (10 point scale) in 67 % of patients. 74 % of patients were discharged on POD 1 and 96 % were discharged by POD 2. An assessment of the quartile learning curve for the unilateral RSS-A showed operative times decreased from a mean of 124 to 103 min after 21 cases (p = 0.05).
Conclusion
Patients with functioning and non-functioning tumors, along with those with obesity can safely be treated with RSS-A. The surgeon learning curve was associated with shortened operative times and not increased complication rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Morino M, Beninca G, Giraudo G, Del Genio GM, Rebecchi F, Garrone C (2004) Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1742–1746
Aksoy E, Taskin HE, Aliyev S, Mitchell J, Sperstein A, Berber E (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy in obese patients. Surg Endosc 27:1233–1236
Taskin HE, Berber E (2013) Robotic adrenalectomy. Cancer J 1:162–166
Heemskerk J, Zandbergen HR, Keet SW, Martijnse I, van Montfort G, Peters RJ, Svircevic V, Bouwman RA, Baeten CG, Bouvy ND (2014) Relax, it’s just laparoscopy! A prospective randomized trial on heart rate variability of the surgeon in robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 31(3):225–232
Hubert N, Gilles M, Desbrosses K, Meyer JP, Felblinger J, Hubert J (2013) Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon’s physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures. Int J Med Robot 9(2):142–147
Arghami A, Dy B, Bingener J, Osborn J, Richards M (2015) Single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness. JSLS 19(1):1–5
Thompson GB, Grant CS, van Heerden JA, Schlinkert RT, Young WF Jr, Farley DR, Ilstrup DM (1997) Laparoscopic versus open posterior adrenalectomy: a case–control study of 100 patients. Surgery 122(6):1132–1136
Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E (1992) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 327(14):1033
Fausto PF, Sebay F, Sierra M, Ippolito G, Souteyard P, Henry JF (2006) Long-term outcome following laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large solid adrenal cortex tumors. World J Surg 30:893–898
Nordenstrom E, Westerdahl J, Hallgrimsson P, Bergenfelz A (2011) A prospective study of 100 robotically assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomies. J Robot Surg 5:127–131
Brunaud L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, Rouers A, Klein M, Boissel P, Bresler L (2008) Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery 144:995–1001
Brunaud L, Bresler L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, Raphoz A-L, Levan T, Weryha G, Boissel P (2008) Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Am J Surg 195:433–438
Winter JM, Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Hundt JD, Dackiw AP, Campbell KA, Schulick RD (2006) Thirty robotic adrenalectomies: a single institution’s experience. Surg Endosc 20:119–124
Pineda-Solis K, Medina-Franco H, Heslin MJ (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a comparative study in a high-volume center. Surg Endosc 27:599–602
Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery 151:537–542
Svoboda S, Qaqish TR, Wilson A, Park H, Youssef Y (2015) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy in the obese: outcomes from a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(4):882–885
Clark LH, Soliman PT, Odetto D, Munsell MF, Schmeler KM, Fleming N, Westin SN, Nick AM, Ramirez PT (2013) Incidence of trocar site herniation following robotic gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 131:400–403
Acknowledgement
Scott Harmsen and Courtney Heins for statistical analysis support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Grace S. Lee, Arman Arghami, Benzon M. Dy, Travis J. McKenzie, Geoffrey B. Thompson and Melanie L. Richards do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, G.S., Arghami, A., Dy, B.M. et al. Robotic single-site adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 30, 3351–3356 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4611-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4611-1