Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopy decreases complications for obese patients undergoing elective rectal surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

While there are many reported advantages to laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery, the impact of a laparoscopic approach on postoperative morbidity in obese patients undergoing rectal surgery has not been studied. Our goal was to determine whether obese patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal surgery experienced the same benefits as non-obese patients.

Methods

We identified patients undergoing rectal resections using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Participant Use Data File. We performed multivariable analyses to determine the independent association between laparoscopy and postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 26,437 patients underwent rectal resection. The mean age was 58.5 years, 32.6 % were obese, and 47.2 % had cancer. Laparoscopic procedures were slightly less common in obese patients compared to non-obese patients (36.0 vs. 38.2 %, p = 0.0006). In unadjusted analyses, complications were lower with the laparoscopic approach in both obese (18.9 vs. 32.4 %, p < 0.0001) and non-obese (15.6 vs. 25.3 %, p < 0.0001) patients. In a multivariable analysis controlling for potential confounders, the risk of postoperative complications increased as the degree of obesity worsened. The likelihood of experiencing a postoperative complication increased by 25, 45, and 75 % for obese class I, obese class II, and obese class III patients, respectively. A laparoscopic approach was associated with a 40 % decreased odds of a postoperative complication for all patients (OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.56–0.64).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic rectal surgery is associated with fewer complications when compared to open rectal surgery in both obese and non-obese patients. Obesity was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. In appropriately selected patients, rectal surgery outcomes may be improved with a minimally invasive approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baskin ML, Ard J, Franklin F, Allison DB (2005) Prevalence of obesity in the United States. Obes Rev 6:5–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM (2014) Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA 311:806–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai Y, Zhou Y, Li Z, Xiang J, Chen Z (2013) Surgical outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer in obese patients: a comparative study with open colectomy. Oncol Lett 6:1057–1062

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hourigan JS (2011) Impact of obesity on surgical site infection in colon and rectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 24:283–290

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Madboulay K, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2003) Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. J Gastrointest Surg 7:558–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahmood T (2013) Laparoscopic surgery in obese women. In: Obesity a ticking time bomb for reproductive health. Elsevier, London, pp. 571–582

  7. Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Pugely AJ, Heise CP, Foley EF, Kennedy GD (2011) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg 212:844–854

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson MZ, Hollenbeak CS, Stewart DB (2014) Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complications than open colectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis. Colorectal Dis 16:382–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiran RP, El-Gazzaz GH, Vogel JD, Remzi FH (2010) Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: data from national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 211:232–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai JH, Law WL (2012) Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Br Med Bull 104:61–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. ACS NSQIP (n.d.) Retrieved January 10, 2015, from https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip/about

  12. Scheidbach H, Benedix F, Hugel O, Kose D, Kockerling F, Lippert H (2008) Laparoscopic approach to colorectal procedures in the obese patient: risk factor or benefit? Obes Surg 18:66–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasson AM (2011) Risk of pneumoperitoneum in obese: old myths and new realities. World J Laparosc Surg 4:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T, Martinez S, Chen W, Weiss EG et al (2002) Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16:855–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitching AJ, O’Neil SS (2009) Fast-track surgery and anaesthesia. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 9:39–43

  16. Martin ST, Stocchi L (2011) Laparoscopic colorectal resection in the obese patient. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24:263–273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones OM, Lindsey I, Cunningham C (2011) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. BMJ 28:343

  18. Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20:947–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B et al (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15:827–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19:47–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Miller J et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:197–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Award #UL1TR000071, NIH T-32 Grant # 5T32DK007639, and AHRQ Grant #1R24HS022134.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela M. Vargas.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Gabriela M. Vargas, Eric P. Sieloff, Abhishek D. Parmar, Nina P. Tamirisa, Hemalkumar B. Mehta, and Taylor S. Riall have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vargas, G.M., Sieloff, E.P., Parmar, A.D. et al. Laparoscopy decreases complications for obese patients undergoing elective rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30, 1826–1832 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4463-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4463-8

Keywords

Navigation