Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trans-oral cricomyotomy using a flexible endoscope: technique and clinical outcomes

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) is a rare upper esophageal pathology that is most prevalent in the sixth and seventh decade. Three different therapeutical options are available: (1) open trans-cervical approach, (2) rigid endoscopy and (3) flexible endoscopy. Our hypothesis is that a flexible endoscopic cricomyotomy represents a safe and effective treatment of ZD as well as cricopharyngeal spasm.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients that underwent a flexible endoscopic cricomyotomy at our institution between October 2008 and May 2014 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative (1 month and long-term follow-up) symptom scores and clinical outcomes were collected. Briefly, the ZD is carefully identified endoscopically and the common wall is divided using needle knife cautery with the help of an endoscopic cap. Clips are used to close the mucosal defect starting with the apex.

Results

Twenty-six patients underwent a flexible endoscopic myotomy for a ZD. Of 26 patients, five (19.2 %) had a history of previous open or stapled trans-oral myotomy and four (15.4 %) underwent a concomitant foregut procedure. Mean length of stay was 1.5 days (range 1–11). Mean operative time was 68 min (range 28–149). One patient presented with a postoperative leak, and one patient presented with a retained clip. Both were treated endoscopically. Recurrent weekly dysphagia was present in 3/26 (11.5 %). One patient (3.8 %) underwent an endoscopic bougie dilatation postoperatively. With regard to clinical outcomes, there was a statistically significant improvement in both short-term (1 month) and long-term (median follow-up 21.8 months; range 1–68.2 months) dysphagia (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), regurgitation (p = 0.001; p = 0.017), cough (p = 0.006; p = 0.025) and aspiration (p = 0.013; p = 0.013).

Conclusion

Flexible endoscopic cricomyotomy offers durable relief of dysphagia, regurgitation, cough and aspiration in ZD patients. It appears to have a good safety profile with symptomatic recurrence occurring in up to 11.5 % of cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dohlman G, Mattsson O (1960) The endoscopic operation for hypopharyngeal diverticula. Arch Otolaryngol 71:744–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilken R, Whited C, Scher RL (2015) Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum: review of experience in 337 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 124(1):21–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Repici A, Pagano N, Fumagalli U et al (2011) Transoral treatment of Zenker diverticulum: flexible endoscopy versus endoscopic stapling. A retrospective comparison of outcomes. Dis Esophagus 24:235–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mulder CJJ, den Hartog G, Robijn RJ, Thies JE (1995) Flexible endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: a new approach. Endoscopy 27:438–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishioka S, Sakai P, Maluf Filho F, Melo JM (1995) Endoscopic incision of Zenker’s diverticulum: a new approach. Endoscopy 27:438–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halland M, Grooteman KV, Baron TH (2015) Flexible endosopic management of Zenker’s diverticulum: characteristics and outcomes of 52 cases at a tertiary referral center. Dis Esophagus

  7. Huberty V et al (2013) Endoscopic treatment for Zenker’s diverticulum: long-term results (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 77:701–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aiolfi A, Scolari F, Saino G, Bonavina L (2015) Current status of minimally invasive endoscopic management for Zenker diverticulum. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7(2):87–93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dzeletovich I et al (2012) Flexible endoscopic and surgical management of Zenker’s diverticulum. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(4):449–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang CY et al (2009) Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum: review of literature and experience in 159 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 113:957–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Richtsmeier WJ et al (2005) Myotomy length determinants in endoscopic staple-assisted esophagodiverticulostomy for small Zenker’s diverticula. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:341–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rieder E et al (2011) Flexible endoscopic Zenkers diverticulotomy with a novel bipolar forceps: a pilot study and comparison with needleknife dissection. Surg Endosc 25:3273–3278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katzaka DA, Baron TH (2013) Editorial Transoral flexible endoscopic therapy of Zenker’s diverticulum: is it time for gastroenterologists to stick their necks out? Gastrointest Endosc 77(5):708–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding or grants were used for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Hopital Sacre-Coeur, 5400, Blvd Gouin Ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada

    Radu Pescarus

  2. Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada

    Eran Shlomovitz

  3. Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Division, The Oregon Clinic, 3805 NE Glisan St, Suite 6N60, Portland, OR, 97213, USA

    Ahmed M. Sharata, Maria A. Cassera, Kevin M. Reavis, Christy M. Dunst & Lee L. Swanström

  4. IHU-Strasbourg (Institute for Image Guided Surgery), 1, Place de l’Hopital, 67091, Strasbourg, France

    Lee L. Swanström

Authors
  1. Radu Pescarus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eran Shlomovitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmed M. Sharata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria A. Cassera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kevin M. Reavis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christy M. Dunst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lee L. Swanström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radu Pescarus.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Radu Pescarus, Eran Shlomovitz, Ahmed M. Sharata, Maria A. Cassera, Kevin M. Reavis, Christy M. Dunst and Lee L. Swanström have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pescarus, R., Shlomovitz, E., Sharata, A.M. et al. Trans-oral cricomyotomy using a flexible endoscope: technique and clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc 30, 1784–1789 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4445-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4445-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation