Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of postoperative complications on the recovery of elderly surgical patients

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

While the negative impact of postoperative complications on hospital costs, survival, and cancer recurrence is well known, few studies have quantified the impact of postoperative complications on patient-centered outcomes such as functional status. The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of postoperative complications on recovery of functional status after elective abdominal surgery in elderly patients.

Methods

Elderly patients (70 years and older) undergoing elective abdominal surgery, with a planned length of stay >1 day, were prospectively enrolled between July 2012 and December 2014. The primary outcome was time to recovery to the preoperative functional status measured by the short physical performance battery (SPPB) preoperatively and at 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The comprehensive complication index was calculated to grade the severity and number of postoperative complications. A Weibull survival model with interval censoring was performed, controlling for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index−CCI), frailty, presence of cancer, nutritional status, wound class, preoperative functional status, and surgical approach.

Results

Hundred and forty-nine patients (79 men and 70 women) were included in the analysis. Mean age was 77.7 ± 4.9 years, mean BMI was 27.2 ± 5.5 kg/m2, and the median CCI was 3 (IQR 2–6). The mean preoperative SPPB score was 9.62 ± 2.33. A total of 52 patients (34.9 %) experienced one or more postoperative complications, including four mortalities, and a total of 72 complications. The mean comprehensive complication index score for these patients was 25.7 ± 23.8. In the presence of all other variables included in the model, a higher comprehensive complication index score was found to significantly decrease the hazard of recovery (HR 0.96, CI 0.94–0.98, p value = 0.0004) and hence increase the time to recovery.

Conclusion

Following elective abdominal surgery, elderly patients who experience a greater number and more severe postoperative complications take longer to return to their preoperative functional status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richardson JD, Cocanour CS, Kern JA, Garrison RN, Kirton OC, Cofer JB, Spain DA, Thomason MH (2004) Perioperative risk assessment in elderly and high-risk patients. J Am Coll Surg 199:133–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Duron JJ, Duron E, Dugue T, Pujol J, Muscari F, Collet D, Pessaux P, Hay JM (2011) Risk factors for mortality in major digestive surgery in the elderly: a multicenter prospective study. Ann Surg 254:375–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jin F, Chung F (2001) Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly. Br J Anaesth 87:608–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bentrem DJ, Cohen ME, Hynes DM, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2009) Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Arch Surg 144:1013–1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Massarweh NN, Legner VJ, Symons RG, McCormick WC, Flum DR (2009) Impact of advancing age on abdominal surgical outcomes. Arch Surg 144:1108–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Etzioni DA, Liu JH, Maggard MA, Ko CY (2003) The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg 238:170–177

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sieber FE, Barnett SR (2011) Preventing postoperative complications in the elderly. Anesthesiol Clin 29:83–97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Manku K, Bacchetti P, Leung JM (2003) Prognostic significance of postoperative in-hospital complications in elderly patients. I. Long-term survival. Anesth Analg 96:583–589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakobson T, Karjagin J, Vipp L, Padar M, Parik AH, Starkopf L, Kern H, Tammik O, Starkopf J (2014) Postoperative complications and mortality after major gastrointestinal surgery. Med (Kaunas) 50:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Hwang DW, Jung K, Kim YK (2013) Postoperative complications influence prognosis and recurrence patterns in periampullary cancer. World J Surg 37:2234–2241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown SR, Mathew R, Keding A, Marshall HC, Brown JM, Jayne DG (2014) The impact of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 259:916–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chee J, Tan KY (2010) Outcome studies on older patients undergoing surgery are missing the mark. J Am Geriatr Soc 58:2238–2240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR, Allore H (2002) Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N Engl J Med 346:1061–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49:M85–M94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Freire AN, Guerra RO, Alvarado B, Guralnik JM, Zunzunegui MV (2012) Validity and reliability of the short physical performance battery in two diverse older adult populations in Quebec and Brazil. J Aging Health 24:863–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Volpato S, Cavalieri M, Sioulis F, Guerra G, Maraldi C, Zuliani G, Fellin R, Guralnik JM (2011) Predictive value of the short physical performance battery following hospitalization in older patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA (2006) Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:743–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwon S, Perera S, Pahor M, Katula JA, King AC, Groessl EJ, Studenski SA (2009) What is a meaningful change in physical performance? Findings from a clinical trial in older adults (the LIFE-P study). J Nutr Health Aging 13:538–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Larson KJ, Hamlin RJ, Sprung J, Schroeder DR, Weingarten TN (2014) Associations between Charlson comorbidity index and surgical risk severity and the surgical outcomes in advanced-age patients. Am Surg 80:555–560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sacks GS, Dearman K, Replogle WH, Cora VL, Meeks M, Canada T (2000) Use of subjective global assessment to identify nutrition-associated complications and death in geriatric long-term care facility residents. J Am Coll Nutr 19:570–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA, Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research G (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M146–M156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. American College of Surgeons (2013) User guide for the 2012 ACS NSQIP participant use data file

  24. Slankamenac K, Nederlof N, Pessaux P, de Jonge J, Wijnhoven BP, Breitenstein S, Oberkofler CE, Graf R, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2014) The comprehensive complication index: a novel and more sensitive endpoint for assessing outcome and reducing sample size in randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 260:757–762; discussion 762–753

  25. Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson DL (1994) The analysis of survival (mortality) data: fitting Gompertz, Weibull, and logistic functions. Mech Ageing Dev 74:15–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Kepka L, Oledzki J, Bebenek M, Kryj M, Polish Colorectal Study G (2005) Postoperative complications in patients irradiated pre-operatively for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy versus chemoradiation. Colorectal Dis 7:410–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Healey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM, Rogers FB, Burns E (2002) Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg 137:611–617; discussion 617–618

  30. Anthony T, Hynan LS, Rosen D, Kim L, Nwariaku F, Jones C, Sarosi G (2003) The association of pretreatment health-related quality of life with surgical complications for patients undergoing open surgical resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 238:690–696

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lawrence VA, Hazuda HP, Cornell JE, Pederson T, Bradshaw PT, Mulrow CD, Page CP (2004) Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 199:762–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fried TR, Van Ness PH, Byers AL, Towle VR, O’Leary JR, Dubin JA (2007) Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness. J Gen Intern Med 22:495–501

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, Studenski S, Berkman LF, Wallace RB (2000) Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M221–M231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ostir GV, Volpato S, Fried LP, Chaves P, Guralnik JM, Women’s H, Aging S (2002) Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function: results from the Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol 55:916–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Volpato S, Cavalieri M, Guerra G, Sioulis F, Ranzini M, Maraldi C, Fellin R, Guralnik JM (2008) Performance-based functional assessment in older hospitalized patients: feasibility and clinical correlates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:1393–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Phillips C, White RP Jr, Shugars DA, Zhou X (2003) Risk factors associated with prolonged recovery and delayed healing after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1436–1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kirchhoff P, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D (2010) Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Saf Surg 4:5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, Syin D, Bandeen-Roche K, Patel P, Takenaga R, Devgan L, Holzmueller CG, Tian J, Fried LP (2010) Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 210:901–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ward N (2003) Nutrition support to patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Nutr J 2:18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Retornaz F, Monette J, Batist G, Monette M, Sourial N, Small D, Caplan S, Wan-Chow-Wah D, Puts MT, Bergman H (2008) Usefulness of frailty markers in the assessment of the health and functional status of older cancer patients referred for chemotherapy: a pilot study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:518–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Peuckmann V, Ekholm O, Rasmussen NK, Moller S, Groenvold M, Christiansen P, Eriksen J, Sjogren P (2007) Health-related quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: nationwide survey in Denmark. Breast Cancer Res Treat 104:39–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bergman S, Deban M, Martelli V, Monette M, Sourial N, Hamadani F, Teasdale D, Holcroft C, Zakrzewski H, Fraser S (2014) Association between quality of care and complications after abdominal surgery. Surgery 156:632–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J, Lewis SR, Alderson P, Smith AF (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 101:172–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, Ko CY, Esnaola NF, American Collegeof Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement P, American Geriatrics S (2012) Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 215:453–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Carli F, Awasthi R, Gillis C, Kassouf W (2014) Optimizing a frail elderly patient for radical cystectomy with a prehabilitation program. Can Urol Assoc J 8:E884–E887

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research and McGill Surgical Scientist Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Bergman.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Tahiri, Ms. Sikder, Dr. Maimon, Ms. Teasdale, Ms. Sourial, Dr. Fraser, Dr. Demyttenaere, and Dr. Guralnick have no conflicts of interest or financial relationships to disclose. Dr Bergman is a consultant for Baxter and Covidien. Dr. Feldman receives an unrestricted educational Grant from Conmed and the Steinberg-Bernstein Center receives an unrestricted educational Grant from Covidien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tahiri, M., Sikder, T., Maimon, G. et al. The impact of postoperative complications on the recovery of elderly surgical patients. Surg Endosc 30, 1762–1770 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4440-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4440-2

Keywords

Navigation