Skip to main content
Log in

Basket-in-catheter access for transcystic laparoscopic bile duct exploration: technique and results

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

When common bile duct (CBD) stones are detected during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the insertion of baskets via the cystic duct (CD) can be difficult and may occasionally cause complications. We introduced a new technique ‘basket in catheter’ (BIC) for transcystic CBD exploration.

Methods

Although cannulating the CD using a cholangiography catheter is successful in most cases, it may occasionally be difficult. Cystic duct anatomy may prevent the usually stiffer sharper tip of the basket, from entering the CBD, resulting in failure, perforation or a false passage. In the majority of our cases, the cholangiography catheter (CC) is not withdrawn from the duct should the intraoperative cholangiography show CBD stones. The tip of a basket is inserted into the CC and advanced to a predetermined distance, allowing the tip of the basket to exit the end of the CC into the CBD. The basket is then opened, advanced to feel the lower end and manipulated to trap the stone. The common hepatic duct is compressed gently to prevent stones from slipping upwards. The catheter and basket are pulled back together to extract the stone.

Results

We have used this technique in 274 cases since 2010. The rate of transcystic versus choledochotomy stone extraction has increased, saving unnecessary choledochotomies. The percentage of transcystic exploration increased from 55 % for the period 2005–2009 to 70 % for the period 2010–2014. There were no conversions to open surgery and no retained stones. The morbidity rate was 4.0 % with no mortality.

Conclusions

We demonstrate a technique to facilitate the insertion of extraction baskets into the common bile duct using the cholangiography catheter as a guide. The ‘basket-in-catheter’ (BIC) technique for transcystic CBD exploration is easier and safer than inserting the basket alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pitt HA (1993) Role of open choledochotomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Am J Surg 165:483–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hermann RE (1989) The spectrum of biliary stone disease. Am J Surg 158:171–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Way LW, Admirand WH, Dunphy JE (1972) Management of choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 176:347–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93:1185–1191. doi:10.1002/bjs.5568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, Diamond T, Taylor MA (2013) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD003327. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Poulose BK, Arbogast PG, Holzman MD (2006) National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores. Surg Endosc 20:186–190. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0235-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA, Nassar AH (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1552–1556. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0809-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, Pelletier G, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Buffet C, Etienne JP (1996) Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis. Lancet 347:75–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Faerden AE, Fagertun H, Rosseland AR (1998) Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function. Arch Surg 133:162–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, Tamm EP, Kwong KL, Gill BS, Sellin JH, Peden EK, Mercer DW (2001) Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 234:33–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Joyce WP, Keane R, Burke GJ, Daly M, Drumm J, Egan TJ, Delaney PV (1991) Identification of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 78:1174–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cetta F (1993) Do surgical and endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent or facilitate recurrent common duct stone formation? Arch Surg 128:329–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamouda AH, Goh W, Mahmud S, Khan M, Nassar AH (2007) Intraoperative cholangiography facilitates simple transcystic clearance of ductal stones in units without expertise for laparoscopic bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 21:955–959. doi:10.1007/s00464-006-9127-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nassar AH, El Shallaly G, Hamouda AH (2009) Optimising laparoscopic cholangiography time using a simple cannulation technique. Surg Endosc 23:513–517. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9853-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gough V, Stephens N, Ahmed Z, Nassar AH (2012) Intrahepatic choledochoscopy during trans-cystic common bile duct exploration; technique, feasibility and value. Surg Endosc 26:3190–3194. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2315-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000103069.00170.9c

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gologan E, Balan G, Stanciu C (2006) Conventional ultrasound in the diagnosis of bile duct calculi. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 110:824–829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad H. M. Nassar.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Haitham Qandeel, Samer Zino, Zulfiqar Hanif, M. Kazem Nassar and Ahmad H. M. Nassar have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qandeel, H., Zino, S., Hanif, Z. et al. Basket-in-catheter access for transcystic laparoscopic bile duct exploration: technique and results. Surg Endosc 30, 1958–1964 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4421-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4421-5

Keywords

Navigation