Abstract
Background
A substantial part of the oncologic surgical procedure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is systematic lymph node dissection (sLND). However, controversies still exist regarding the quality of minimally invasive (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, VATS) sLND in oncologic resections. The rate of stage migration from clinical to pathological N-status has been discussed as one parameter for the quality of sLND.
Methods
Between March 2011 and May 2014, seventy-seven patients (62 male, 15 female) were scheduled for anatomical lung resection and sLND by VATS for clinical stage I (UICC 7th edition) NSCLC. Preoperative staging was performed by [18F]-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Patient data were retrospectively analyzed with regard to divergence in clinical and pathological N-factor. FDG-PET/CTs of patients with lymph node (LN) upstaging after VATS resections were blindly re-evaluated by an experienced radiologist.
Results
In FDG-PET/CT, preoperative tumor stage was cT1N0M0 in 41 (53.2 %) and cT2aN0M0 in 28 (36.4 %) patients. In six (7.8 %) patients the primary tumor was not suspicious for malignancy, and in two (2.6 %) patients the tumor was not evaluable due to prior wedge resection before FDG-PET/CT. Thirty-one (40.3 %) left-sided and 46 (59.7 %) right-sided pulmonary resections with sLND were performed; 19.57 ± 0.99 LNs were dissected. In 13 (16.9 %) patients a nodal stage migration from preoperative clinical to postoperative pathological N-stage was observed [cN0 to pN1 in 9 (11.7 %) and cN0 to pN2 in 4 (5.2 %) cases]. In correlation to the clinical T-factor, the rate of N-factor upstaging for cT1 was 12.2 % and for cT2a was 28.6 %, respectively. In 50 % of the patients with postoperative nodal staging shift, no changes were observed on re-evaluation of the preoperative FDG-PET/CT.
Conclusion
In this series of clinical stage I NSCLC patients, the rate of nodal stage migration after sLND by VATS is higher than previously reported. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to prove the oncologic quality of a sLND by VATS versus standard open approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee PC, Nasar A, Port JL, Paul S, Stiles B, Chiu YL, Andrews WG, Altorki NK (2013) Long-term survival after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 96:951–961
Flores RM, Park BJ, Dycoco J, Aronova A, Hirth Y, Rizk NP, Bains M, Downey RJ, Rusch VW (2009) Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138:11–18
Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC (2009) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2553–2562
Handy JR Jr, Asaph JW, Douville EC, Ott GY, Grunkemeier GL, Wu Y (2010) Does video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer provide improved functional outcomes compared with open lobectomy? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37:451–455
Demmy TL, Nwogu C (2008) Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better? Quality of life considerations. Ann Thorac Surg 85:S719–S728
Lardinois D, De Leyn P, Van Schil P, Porta RR, Waller D, Passlick B, Zielinski M, Lerut T, Weder W (2006) ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30:787–792
Palade E, Passlick B, Osei-Agyemang T, Gunter J, Wiesemann S (2013) Video-assisted vs open mediastinal lymphadenectomy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44:244–249
Watanabe A, Koyanagi T, Ohsawa H, Mawatari T, Nakashima S, Takahashi N, Sato H, Abe T (2005) Systematic node dissection by VATS is not inferior to that through an open thoracotomy: a comparative clinicopathologic retrospective study. Surgery 138:510–517
Boffa DJ, Kosinski AS, Paul S, Mitchell JD, Onaitis M (2012) Lymph node evaluation by open or video-assisted approaches in 11,500 anatomic lung cancer resections. Ann Thorac Surg 94:347–353
Wang W, Yin W, Shao W, Jiang G, Wang Q, Liu L, Liu D, Wang Z, Zhu Z, Chen H, He J (2014) Comparative study of systematic thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy and conventional thoracotomy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 6:45–51
Ramos R, Girard P, Masuet C, Validire P, Gossot D (2012) Mediastinal lymph node dissection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: totally thoracoscopic vs thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41:1342–1348
Wilson JL, Louie BE, Cerfolio RJ, Park BJ, Vallieres E, Aye RW, Abdel-Razek A, Bryant A, Farivar AS (2014) The prevalence of nodal upstaging during robotic lung resection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1901–1907
Licht PB, Jorgensen OD, Ladegaard L, Jakobsen E (2013) A national study of nodal upstaging after thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 96:943–950
Merritt RE, Hoang CD, Shrager JB (2013) Lymph node evaluation achieved by open lobectomy compared with thoracoscopic lobectomy for N0 lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1171–1177
Darling GE, Allen MS, Decker PA, Ballman K, Malthaner RA, Inculet RI, Jones DR, McKenna RJ, Landreneau RJ, Rusch VW, Putnam JB Jr (2011) Randomized trial of mediastinal lymph node sampling versus complete lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection in the patient with N0 or N1 (less than hilar) non-small cell carcinoma: results of the American College of Surgery Oncology Group Z0030 Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:662–670
Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Christensen M (2011) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy using a standardized anterior approach. Surg Endosc 25:1263–1269
Gossot D (2008) Technical tricks to facilitate totally endoscopic major pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg 86:323–326
Daniels LJ, Balderson SS, Onaitis MW, D’Amico TA (2002) Thoracoscopic lobectomy: a safe and effective strategy for patients with stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 74:860–864
Gonzalez-Rivas D, Paradela M, Fernandez R, Delgado M, Fieira E, Mendez L, Velasco C, de la Torre M (2013) Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: two years of experience. Ann Thorac Surg 95:426–432
Flores RM (2010) Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: focus on technique. World J Surg 34:616–620
Lee HS, Jang HJ (2012) Thoracoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection for lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 24:131–141
De Leyn P, Dooms C, Kuzdzal J, Lardinois D, Passlick B, Rami-Porta R, Turna A, Van Schil P, Venuta F, Waller D, Weder W, Zielinski M (2014) Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 45:787–798
Mountain CF, Dresler CM (1997) Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest 111:1718–1723
Luzzi L, Paladini P, Ghiribelli C, Voltolini L, Di Bisceglie M, D’Agata A, Cacchiarelli M, Gotti G (2000) Assessing the prognostic value of the extent of mediastinal lymph node infiltration in surgically-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 30:99–105
Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, Meyers B, Decker PA, Putnam JB, McKenna RW, Landrenau RJ, Jones DR, Inculet RI, Malthaner RA (2010) Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:976–983
D’Amico TA, Niland J, Mamet R, Zornosa C, Dexter EU, Onaitis MW (2011) Efficacy of mediastinal lymph node dissection during lobectomy for lung cancer by thoracoscopy and thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 92:226–232
Sagawa M, Sato M, Sakurada A, Matsumura Y, Endo C, Handa M, Kondo T (2002) A prospective trial of systematic nodal dissection for lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery: can it be perfect? Ann Thorac Surg 73:900–904
Watanabe A, Mishina T, Ohori S, Koyanagi T, Nakashima S, Mawatari T, Kurimoto Y, Higami T (2008) Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery a feasible approach for clinical N0 and postoperatively pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:812–818
Zhong C, Yao F, Zhao H (2013) Clinical outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy for patients with clinical N0 and pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 95:987–992
Li Y, Wang J (2012) Comparison of clinical outcomes for patients with clinical N0 and pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer after thoracoscopic lobectomy and open lobectomy: a retrospective analysis of 76 patients. J Surg Oncol 106:431–435
Amer K, Khan AZ, Singh N, Addis B, Jogai S, Harden S, Peebles C, Brown I (2011) Video-assisted thoracic surgery systematic mediastinal nodal dissection and stage migration: impact on clinical pathway. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:1474–1481
D’Cunha J, Herndon JE 2nd, Herzan DL, Patterson GA, Kohman LJ, Harpole DH, Kernstine KH, Kern JA, Green MR, Maddaus MA, Kratzke RA (2005) Poor correspondence between clinical and pathologic staging in stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer: results from CALGB 9761, a prospective trial. Lung Cancer 48:241–246
Disclosures
Martin Reichert, Dagmar Steiner, Stefanie Kerber, Julia Bender, Bernd Pösentrup, Andreas Hecker, and Johannes Bodner have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Right-sided subcarinal lymph node dissection (WMV 80896 kb)
Right-sided pre- and paratracheal lymph node dissection (WMV 75591 kb)
Left-sided subcarinal lymph node dissection (WMV 65544 kb)
Left-sided aorto-pulmonary and paraaortic lymph node dissection (WMV 52943 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reichert, M., Steiner, D., Kerber, S. et al. A standardized technique of systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) leads to a high rate of nodal upstaging in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Surg Endosc 30, 1119–1125 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4312-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4312-9