Taxonomy of instructions given to residents in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- 265 Downloads
Although simulation-based training allows residents to become proficient in surgical skills outside the OR, residents still depend on senior surgeons’ guidance in transferring skills accumulated from simulators into the operating room. This study aimed to identify and classify explicit instructions made by attending surgeons to their residents during laparoscopic surgery. Through these instructions, we examined the role gaze guidance plays in OR-based training.
A total of ten laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases being performed by PGY4 residents were analyzed. The explicit directional instructions given by the mentoring attending surgeons to their residents were identified and classified into four categories based on their locations in the coordinate system. These categories were further combined into two classes, based on the target of instructions. The frequencies of instructions in the two classes were compared, and effect size was calculated.
There were 1984 instructions identified in the ten cases. The instructions were categorized into instrument guidance (38.51 %) and gaze guidance (61.49 %). The instrument guidance focused on moving the instruments to perform surgical tasks, including directions to targets, instrument manipulation, and instrument interaction. The gaze guidance focused on achieving common ground during the operation, including target identification and target fixation. The frequency of gaze guidance is significantly higher than instrument guidance in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p < 0.001) with a large effect size (r = 0.6).
Gaze guidance has become the main focus of OR-based training. The results show a tight connection between adopting expert gaze and performing surgical tasks and suggest that gaze training should be integrated into the simulation training.
KeywordsSurgical training Simulation-based training OR-based training Gaze training Instrument guidance
The authors would like to acknowledge Amine Chellali for his support in data collection. This work was sponsored by NSF Grant IIS–1422671.
Ms. Feng, Mr. Wong, Dr. Park, and Dr. Mentis have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA, Ramel S, Smith CD, Arvidsson D (2007) Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193:797–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 6.Mentis HM, Chellali A, Schwaitzberg S (2014) Learning to see the body: supporting instructional practices in laparoscopic surgical procedures. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 2113–2122Google Scholar
- 7.Law B, Atkins MS, Kirkpatrick AE, Lomax AJ (2004) Eye gaze patterns differentiate novice and experts in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment. In: Proceedings of the 2004 symposium on eye tracking research and applications, ACM, pp 41–48Google Scholar
- 13.Tien G, Atkins MS, Jiang X, Zheng B, Bednarik R (2014) Verbal gaze instruction matches visual gaze guidance in laparoscopic skills training. In: Proceedings of the symposium on eye tracking research and applications, ACM, pp 331–334Google Scholar
- 17.Corbin J, Strauss A (2014) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Beverley HillsGoogle Scholar