Skip to main content

Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy may prove feasible to address surgical needs in limited-resource settings. However, no aggregate data exist regarding the role of laparoscopy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study was designed to describe the issues facing laparoscopy in LMICs and to aggregate reported solutions.

Methods

A search was conducted using Medline, African Index Medicus, the Directory of Open Access Journals, and the LILACS/BIREME/SCIELO database. Included studies were in English, published after 1992, and reported safety, cost, or outcomes of laparoscopy in LMICs. Studies pertaining to arthroscopy, ENT, flexible endoscopy, hysteroscopy, cystoscopy, computer-assisted surgery, pediatrics, transplantation, and bariatrics were excluded. Qualitative synthesis was performed by extracting results that fell into three categories: advantages of, challenges to, and adaptations made to implement laparoscopy in LMICs. PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed.

Results

A total of 1101 abstracts were reviewed, and 58 articles were included describing laparoscopy in 25 LMICs. Laparoscopy is particularly advantageous in LMICs, where there is often poor sanitation, limited diagnostic imaging, fewer hospital beds, higher rates of hemorrhage, rising rates of trauma, and single income households. Lack of trained personnel and equipment were frequently cited challenges. Adaptive strategies included mechanical insufflation with room air, syringe suction, homemade endoloops, hand-assisted techniques, extracorporeal knot tying, innovative use of cheaper instruments, and reuse of disposable instruments. Inexpensive laboratory-based trainers and telemedicine are effective for training.

Conclusions

LMICs face many surgical challenges that require innovation. Laparoscopic surgery may be safe, effective, feasible, and cost-effective in LMICs, although it often remains limited in its accessibility, acceptability, and quality. This study may not capture articles written in languages other than English or in journals not indexed by the included databases. Surgeons, policymakers, and manufacturers should focus on plans for sustainability, training and retention of providers, and regulation of efforts to develop laparoscopy in LMICs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ozgediz D, Riviello R (2008) The ‘other’ neglected diseases in global public health: surgical conditions in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS Med. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050121

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gawande AA (2009) WHO guidelines for safe surgery: safe surgery saves lives. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234:279–289 (discussion 289–291)

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Murphy AA, Nager CW, Wujek JJ, Kettel LM, Torp VA, Chin HG (1992) Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertil Steril 57:1180–1185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Basha YY, El-Muttarid NS, Sief M, Shamoun SE, Rypins EB (1995) The first 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in the Republic of Yemen. J Laparoendosc Surg 5:163–167

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogbonna BC, Obekpa PO, Momoh JT, Obafunwa JO, Nwana EJ (1992) Laparoscopy in developing countries in the management of patients with an acute abdomen. Br J Surg 79:964–966

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Udwadia TE (2004) Diagnostic laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 18:6–10

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryder RM, Vaughan MC (1999) Laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Methods, effectiveness, and sequelae. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 26:83–97

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Udwadia TE (2001) One world, one people, one surgery. Surg Endosc 15:337–343

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bendinelli C, Leal T, Moncade F, Dieng M, Toure CT, Miccoli P (2002) Endoscopic surgery in Senegal. Benefits, costs and limits. Surg Endosc 16:1488–1492

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gnanaraj J (2010) Diagnostic laparoscopies in rural areas: a different use for the cystoscope. Trop Doct 40:156

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adisa AO, Lawal OO, Arowolo OA, Alatise OI (2013) Local adaptations aid establishment of laparoscopic surgery in a semiurban Nigerian hospital. Surg Endosc 27:390–393

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg Lond Engl 8:336–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnan P, Vayoth SO, Dhar P, Surendran S, Ponnambathayil S (2008) Laparoscopy in suspected abdominal tuberculosis is useful as an early diagnostic method. ANZ J Surg 78:987–989

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Manning RG, Aziz AQ (2009) Should laparoscopic cholecystectomy be practiced in the developing world? the experience of the first training program in Afghanistan. Ann Surg 249:794–798

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Malik AM, Talpur KAH, Soomro AG, Qureshi JN (2011) Yield of diagnostic laparoscopy in abdominal tuberculosis: is it worth attempting? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:191–193

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Astudillo JA, Sporn E, Serrano B, Astudillo R (2008) Ascariasis in the hepatobiliary system: laparoscopic management. J Am Coll Surg 207:527–532

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Darwish AM, Amin AF, Mohammad SA (2003) Laparoscopic management of paratubal and paraovarian cysts. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 7:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  19. Raiga J, Kasia JM, Bruhat MA (1999) Laparoscopic surgery in the Cameroon. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 65:65–66

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sewta RS (2011) Laparoscopic female sterilisation by a single port through monitor–a better alternative. J Indian Med Assoc 109:262, 263, 266

    Google Scholar 

  21. Teerawattananon Y, Mugford M (2005) Is it worth offering a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy in developing countries? a Thailand case study. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 3:10

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Straub CM, Price RR, Matthews D, Handrahan DL, Sergelen D (2011) Expanding laparoscopic cholecystectomy to rural Mongolia. World J Surg 35:751–759

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dobbyne C, Horgan LF (2011) Through the keyhole. J Vis Commun Med 34:98–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vellani Y, Bhatti S, Shamsi G, Parpio Y, Ali TS (2009) Evaluation of laparoscopic appendectomy vs. open appendectomy: a retrospective study at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 59:605–608

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mir IS, Mohsin M, Kirmani O, Cheachek BA, Alam I, Wani M (2009) Is laparoscospic orchidectomy the treatment of choice in adults with impalpable testis in rural hospitals in the developing world? Trop Doct 39:12–15

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bal S, Reddy LGS, Parshad R, Guleria R, Kashyap L (2003) Feasibility and safety of day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a developing country. Postgrad Med J 79:284–288

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brekalo Z, Innocenti P, Duzel G, Liddo G, Ballone E, Simunovic VJ (2006) Ten years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison between a developed and a less developed country. Wien Klin Wochenschr 119:722–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bekele S, Biluts H (2012) Laparascopic cholecstectomy at Myungsung Christian Medical Center, Ethiopia: a five-years experience. Ethiop Med J 50:251–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clegg-Lamptey JN, Amponsah G (2010) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana: an initial report. West Afr J Med 29:113–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tintara H, Leetanaporn R (1995) Cost-benefit analysis of laparoscopic adnexectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 50:21–25

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khan N, Naeem M, Bangash A, Sadiq M, Hamid H (2010) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an experience at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 22:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  32. Piukala S (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: complications and experiences in Tonga. Pac Health Dialog 13:107–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hussain A, Mahmood HK, Dulku K (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in a resource-limited setting: the first 49 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in Yemen. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 12:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  34. Parkar RB, Thagana NG, Baraza R, Otieno D (2003) Experience with laparoscopic surgery at the Aga Khan Hospital, Nairobi. East Afr Med J 80:44–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mehraj A, Naqvi MA, Feroz SH, Ur Rasheed H (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 500 patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 23:88–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mufti TS, Ahmad S, Naveed D, Akbar M, Zafar A (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an early experience at Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 19:42–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Asbun HJ, Berguer R, Altamirano R, Castellanos H (1996) Successfully establishing laparoscopic surgery programs in developing countries. Clinical results and lessons learned. Surg Endosc 10:1000–1003

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nande AG, Shrikhande SV, Rathod V, Adyanthaya K, Shrikhande VN (2002) Modified technique of gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a developing country: a 5-year experience. Dig Surg 19:366–371 (discussion 372)

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tintara H, Leetanaporn R, Getpook C, Suntharasaj T (1998) Simplified abdominal wall-lifting device for gasless laparoscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 61:165–170

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Adisa AO, Alatise OI, Arowolo OA, Lawal OO (2012) Laparoscopic appendectomy in a Nigerian teaching hospital. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 16:576–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mir IS, Mohsin M, Majid T, Wani K, Hasan M, Kirmani O, Naqshbandi J, Maqbool M (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a small rural hospital in Kashmir Valley, India. Trop Doct 38:213–216

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Price R, Sergelen O, Unursaikhan C (2013) Improving surgical care in Mongolia: a model for sustainable development. World J Surg 37:1492–1499

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mir IS, Mohsin M, Kirmani O, Majid T, Wani K, Hassan M, Naqshbandi J, Maqbool M (2007) Is intra-operative cholangiography necessary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? a multicentre rural experience from a developing world country. World J Gastroenterol 13:4493–4497

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bessa SS, El-Sayes IA, El-Saiedi MK, Abdel-Baki NA, Abdel-Maksoud MM (2010) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal versus general anesthesia: a prospective, randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:515–520

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hamad MA, El-Khattary OAI (2003) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia with nitrous oxide pneumoperitoneum: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 17:1426–1428

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yuksek YN, Akat AZ, Gozalan U, Daglar G, Pala Y, Canturk M, Tutuncu T, Kama NA (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia. Am J Surg 195:533–536

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Singh DR, Joshi MR, Koirala U, Shrestha BR, Shrestha S, Gautam B (2010) Early experience of day care surgery in Nepal. J Nepal Med Assoc 49:191–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Merrell R, Rosser J (1999) Integration of quality programs by telemedicine in surgical services. Stud Health Technol Inform 64:108–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Beard JH, Akoko L, Mwanga A, Mkony C, O’Sullivan P (2014) Manual laparoscopic skills development using a low-cost trainer box in Tanzania. J Surg Educ 71:85–90

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mir IS, Mohsin M, Malik A, Shah AQ, Majid T (2008) A structured training module using an inexpensive endotrainer for improving the performance of trainee surgeons. Trop Doct 38:217–218

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Okrainec A, Smith L, Azzie G (2009) Surgical simulation in Africa: the feasibility and impact of a 3-day fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery course. Surg Endosc 23:2493–2498

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Okrainec A, Henao O, Azzie G (2010) Telesimulation: an effective method for teaching the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in resource-restricted countries. Surg Endosc 24:417–422

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yahya A, Shuweiref H, Thoboot A, Ekheil M, Ali AA (2008) Laparoscopic repair of penetrating injury of the diaphragm: an experience from a district hospital. Libyan J Med 3:138–139

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hansen D, Gausi SC, Merikebu M (2000) Anaesthesia in Malawi: complications and deaths. Trop Doct 30:146–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ouro-Bang’na Maman AF, Tomta K, Ahouangbévi S, Chobli M (2005) Deaths associated with anaesthesia in Togo, West Africa. Trop Doct 35:220–222

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chauhan A, Mehrotra M, Bhatia PK, Baj B, Gupta AK (2006) Day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a feasibility study in a public health service hospital in a developing country. World J Surg 30:1690–1695 (discussion 1696–1697)

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Garg CP, Vaidya BB, Chengalath MM (2009) Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis. Int J Surg Lond Engl 7:250–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mohamed AA, Mahran KM (2013) Laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: is it safe? J Minimal Access Surg 9:55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Utpal D (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in West Bengal, India. Chin J Dig Dis 6:165–169

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ali R, Khan MR, Pishori T, Tayeb M (2010) Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: is this a feasible option for developing countries? Saudi J Gastroenterol 16:25–29

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mucio M, Felemovicius J, De la Concha F, Cabello R, Zamora A (1994) The Mexican experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration. A multicentric trial. Surg Endosc 8:306–309

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Malla BR, Shrestha RKM (2010) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy complication and conversion rate. Kathmandu Univ Med J 8:367–3369

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Patel SC, Jumba GF, Akmal S (2003) Laparoscopic appendicectomy at the Aga Khan Hospital, Nairobi. East Afr Med J 80:447–451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Sharma AK, Rangan HK, Choubey RP (1998) Mini-lap cholecystectomy: a viable alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the Third World? ANZ J Surg 68:774–777

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Vijayaraghavan R, Chandrashekhar R, Sujatha Y, Belagavi CS (2006) Hospital outbreak of atypical mycobacterial infection of port sites after laparoscopic surgery. J Hosp Infect 64:344–347

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Agarwal BB, Agarwal B, Gupta M, Agarwal S, Mahajan K (2007) Anatomical footprint for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using any energy source: a modified technique. Surg Endosc 21:2154–2158

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sinha R, Gurwara AK, Gupta SC (2009) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: a study of 3492 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:323–327

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. John Meara, Dr. Lars Hagander, and Martha Stone for their support in the implementation of this study.

Disclosures

Drs. Chao, Opoku-Anane, Maine, and Ms. Mandigo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiffany E. Chao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chao, T.E., Mandigo, M., Opoku-Anane, J. et al. Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc 30, 1–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4201-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4201-2

Keywords

  • Global Surgery
  • Laparoscopy
  • LMIC
  • Low-resource settings
  • Training/courses