Skip to main content

Table 7 Multivariable analysis of reoperation

From: TEP versus TAPP: comparison of the perioperative outcome in 17,587 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia

Parameter Category Reoperation
OR [95 % CI] p
ASA II versus I 1.074 [0.709; 1.627] 0.0153
III versus I 1.845 [1.075; 3.166]
IV versus I 5.656 [1.232; 25.955]
Defect size I (<1.5 cm) versus III (>3 cm) 0.423 [0.227; 0.787] 0.0135
II (1.5–3 cm) versus III (>3 cm) 0.658 [0.454; 0.954]
EHS scrotal Yes versus no 1.988 [1.007; 3.922] 0.0478
EHS medial Yes versus no 0.720 [0.436; 1.188] 0.1986
Age*   1.054 [0.932; 1.192] 0.3990
OP method TAPP versus TEP 1.097 [0.786; 1.533] 0.5855
EHS femoral Yes versus no 0.849 [0.318; 2.262] 0.7431
EHS lateral Yes versus no 0.918 [0.540; 1.560] 0.7528
Sex Male versus female 1.009 [0.586; 1.735] 0.9754
  1. * 10-year estimate