Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures for preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective single-institution study consisting of 201 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic proctectomy with double-stapling anastomosis for primary rectal cancer between August 2007 and December 2013. The data for patients who received intracorporeal reinforcing sutures were compared with those of patients who did not receive reinforcing sutures. Patient-, tumor- and surgery-related variables were collected and examined using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The overall incidence of AL was 9.0 % (18/201). No significant correlations were observed between the various clinicopathological factors and the use of reinforcing sutures. The multivariate analyses revealed the distance of the tumor from the anal verge, tumor size and presence of reinforcing sutures to be independent risk factors for AL. We classified the patients into two risk groups using a combination of the tumor site and tumor size: a low-risk group (patients without any risk factors, n = 134) and a high-risk group (patients with one or two risk factors, n = 67). The frequency of AL was significantly lower (p < 0.02) in the patients treated with reinforcing sutures than in those treated without reinforcing sutures in the high-risk group. However, no significant differences were observed in the low-risk group.

Conclusions

The use of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures may reduce the incidence of AL. A prospective randomized trial is required to evaluate the effects of reinforcing sutures in preventing AL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional vs laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicenter, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 350:2050–2059

    Google Scholar 

  3. Patankar SK, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Willamson PR, Gallagher JT, Dejesus S, Narayanan S (2003) Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period. Dis Colon Rectum 46:601–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:1211–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kujan J, Valero G, Hernmandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Milson JW, de Oliveria O, Trencheva KI Jr, Panddey S, Lee SW, Sonoda T (2009) Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1215–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cong ZJ, Hu LH, Bian ZQ, Ye GY, Yu MH, Gao YH, Li ZS, Yu ED, Zhong M (2013) Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an International Grading System following anterior resection for rectal cancer. PLoS One 8(9):e75519. doi:10.1371/journal.Pone.0075519

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taflamps P, Christodoulakins M, Tsiftsis D (2009) Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, Obscurity and Fiction. Surg Today 39:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Michelassi F, Charlson ME, Milson JW (2013) Identifying important predictors of anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg 257:108–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caulfield H, Hyman NH (2013) Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg 148:177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Yamaguchi T (2012) Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intra corporeal rectal transaction and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 202:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Inada R, Moriya Y, Yamamoto S (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using a stapling technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Perctan Tech 22:239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Sakai Y (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 28:2988–2995

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kang SB, Kim JY, Lee KY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SH, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision. Ann Surg 257:665–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, Kim NK (2009) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg 209:694–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Branagan P, Finnis D (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after anterior resection after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, Harling H (2014) Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer—a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 259:930–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y, Saito N (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:703–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao L, Zhang WB, Jiang PC, Bu XF, Yan Q, Zhang YJ, Yu F (2010) Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study. World J Surg 35:1367–1377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao WT, Hu FL, Li YY, Li HJ, Luo WM, Sun F (2013) Use of a transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage and bleeding after anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg 37:227–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nishigori H, Ito M, NIshizawa Y, Kobayashi A, Sugito M, Saito N (2014) Effectiveness of a transanal tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancers surgery. World J Surg 38:1843–1851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gadiot RPM, Dunker MS, Mearadji A, Hannaerts GHH (2011) Reduction of anastomotic failure in laparoscopic antitraction sutures. Surg Endosc 25:68–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs Kiyoshi Maeda, Hisashi Nagahara, Masatsune Shibutani, Hiroshi Otani, Kenji Sugano, Ikeya Tetsuro, Yoshihito Iseki, Katsunobu Sakurai, Takahiro Toyokawa, Kazuya Muguruma, Hiroaki Tanaka, Ryosuke Amano, Kenjiro Kimura and Kosei Hirakawa have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyoshi Maeda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maeda, K., Nagahara, H., Shibutani, M. et al. Efficacy of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 29, 3535–3542 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4104-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4104-2

Keywords

Navigation