Abstract
Background
Prone thoracoscopic esophagectomy was introduced at our institution from 2012. This study describes our experiences of the main differences between thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone and traditional left lateral decubitus positions together with an analysis of the short-term surgical outcomes.
Method
In total, 87 patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy between January 2012 and October 2013 at Tohoku University Hospital were enrolled; of these, 54 and 33 patients were operated in the prone (Group P) and lateral decubitus (Group L) positions, respectively.
Results
The background of the patients was similar, and there was no in-hospital mortality. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of whole surgical duration, thoracic duration, and number of dissected lymph nodes. Total blood loss and thoracic estimated blood loss were significantly lower in Group P than Group L. Furthermore, postoperative pulmonary complications, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay were significantly lower in Group P.
Conclusion
Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position is feasible and safe. The prone position technique may be superior to conventional lateral decubitus position esophagectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37(2):7–11
Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238(4):486–495
Cuschieri A (1994) Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2:21–25
Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthikumar R, Senthilnathan P, parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203(1):7–16
Kato K, Muro K, Minashi K, Ohtsu A, Ishikura S, Boku N, Takiuchi H, Komatsu Y, Miyata Y, Fukuda H, Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) (2011) PhaseIII study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG9906). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(3):684–690
Shitara K, Muro K (2009) Chemoradiotherapy for treatment of esophageal cancer in Japan: current status and perspectives. Gastrointest Cancer Res 3(2):66–72
Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, Shinoda M, Ozawa S, Shimizu H, Nakamura T, Yabusaki H, Aoyama N, Kurita A, Ikeda K, Kanda T, Tsujinaka T, Nakamura K, Fukuda H (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19(1):68–74
Taniyama Y, Nakamura T, Mitamura A, Teshima J, Katsura K, Abe S, Nakano T, Kamei T, Miyata G, Ouchi N (2013) A strategy for supraclavicular lymph node dissection using recurrent laryngeal lymph node status in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 95(6):1930–1937
Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N, Kuriya Y, Kuramoto J, Toyoda T, Wakabayashi A (1996) Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112(12):1533–1540
Ichikawa H, Miyata G, Miyazaki S, Onodera K, Kamei T, Hoshida T, Kikuchi H, Kanba R, Nakano T, Akaishi T, Satomi S (2013) Esophagectomy using a thoracoscopic approach with an open laparotomic or hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal stage for esophageal cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors in 315 patients. Ann Surg 257(5):873–885
Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, Mckelvey AA, Federico JA (2008) Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22(11):2485–2491
Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24(12):2965–2973
Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M (2013) Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position. Surg Today 43(4):386–391
Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Akimori T, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M (2010) Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning. J Anesth 24(5):803–806
Chang AC, Lee JS (2009) Resection for esophageal cancer in the elderly. Thorac Surg Clin 19(3):333–343
Ng JM (2011) Update on anesthetic management for esophagectomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 24(1):37–43
Gockel I, Kneist W, Keilmann A, Junginger T (2005) Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) following esophagectomy for carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:277–281
Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, Devriese PP, van Lanschot JJ, Obertop H (1999) Vocal cord paralysis after subtotal oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 86:1583–1587
Baba M, Natsugoe S, Shimada M, Nakano S, Noguchi Y, Kawachi K, Kusano C, Aikou T (1999) Does hoarseness of voice from recurrent nerve paralysis after esophagectomy for carcinoma influence patient quality of life? J Am Coll Surg 188(3):231–236
Disclosures
Drs. Jin Teshima, Miyata GO, Takashi Kamei, Toru Nakano, Shigeo Abe, Kazunori Katsura, Yusuke Taniyama, Tadashi Sakurai, Makoto Hikage, Takanobu Nakamura, Kai Takaya, Masashi Zuguchi, Hiroshi Okamoto, Youhei Ozawa, and Noriaki Ohuchi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teshima, J., Miyata, G., Kamei, T. et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between prone and lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 29, 2756–2762 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4003-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4003-y