Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of surgical margins on overall and recurrence-free survival in parenchymal-sparing laparoscopic liver resections of colorectal metastases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The relationship between the width of surgical margins and local and distant recurrence of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial. We analyzed the impact of surgical margins in laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) for CRLM, using the parenchymal-sparing approach on overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Methods

From January 2005 to October 2012, 114 first LLR for CRLM were performed and retrospectively analyzed. The ultrasonic aspirator was used for parenchyma division. R1 margins were defined when the tissue width was <1 mm.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 30.9 ± 1.71 months, OS was 97.1–73.9–58.9 % and the RFS 64.2–35.2–31 % at 1–3–5 years, respectively. The major resection rate was 7 %. The median margin width was 3 (0–40) mm, and R1 resection was recorded in 14 (12.3 %) cases. Twenty-two patients (33.3 %) with hepatic recurrence underwent a repeat hepatectomy. R1 margins were significantly related to lower RFS survival (p = 0.038) but did not affect OS. Multivariate analysis showed that lesions located in postero-superior segments (HR = 2.4, 95 % CI 1.24–4.61, p = 0.009) as well as blood loss (HR = 3.2, 95 % CI 1.23–7.99, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for tumor recurrence. The carcinoembryonic antigen level >10 mcg/L affected OS (HR = 4.2 95 % CI 2.02–16.9, p = 0.001), and the resection of more than two tumors was significantly associated with R1 margins (HR = 9.32, 95 % CI 1.14–32.5, p = 0.037).

Discussion

Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing surgery of CRLM does not compromise the oncological outcome, allowing a higher percentage of repeat hepatectomy. R1 margins are a risk factor for tumor recurrence but not for overall survival. The presence of multiple lesions is the only independent risk factor of R1 margins and also the major disadvantage of this technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Are C, Gonen M, Zazzali K, Dematteo RP, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Blumgart LH, D’Angelica M (2007) The impact of margins on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis. Ann Surg 246:295–300

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH (1999) Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 230:309–318 discussion 318-321

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muratore A, Ribero D, Zimmitti G, Mellano A, Langella S, Capussotti L (2010) Resection margin and recurrence-free survival after liver resection of colorectal metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1324–1329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pawlik TM, Scoggins CR, Zorzi D, Abdalla EK, Andres A, Eng C, Curley SA, Loyer EM, Muratore A, Mentha G, Capussotti L, Vauthey JN (2005) Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 241:715–722 discussion 722-714

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dexiang Z, Li R, Ye W, Haifu W, Yunshi Z, Qinghai Y, Shenyong Z, Bo X, Li L, Xiangou P, Haohao L, Lechi Y, Tianshu L, Jia F, Xinyu Q, Jianmin X (2012) Outcome of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: analysis of 1,613 consecutive cases. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2860–2868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris EJ, Forman D, Thomas JD, Quirke P, Taylor EF, Fairley L, Cottier B, Poston G (2010) Surgical management and outcomes of colorectal cancer liver metastases. The British journal of surgery 97:1110–1118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, Pfanner E, Allegrini G, Barbara C, Crino L, Benedetti G, Evangelista W, Fanchini L, Cortesi E, Picone V, Vitello S, Chiara S, Granetto C, Porcile G, Fioretto L, Orlandini C, Andreuccetti M, Masi G, Gruppo Oncologico Nord O (2007) Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol 25:1670–1676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, Nadalin S, Baumgart J, Farkas SA, Fichtner-Feigl S, Lorf T, Goralcyk A, Horbelt R, Kroemer A, Loss M, Rummele P, Scherer MN, Padberg W, Konigsrainer A, Lang H, Obed A, Schlitt HJ (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 255:405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Azad N, Pawlik TM (2013) Surgery for colorectal liver metastases: The evolution of determining prognosis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 5:207–221

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adam R, Delvart V, Pascal G, Valeanu A, Castaing D, Azoulay D, Giacchetti S, Paule B, Kunstlinger F, Ghemard O, Levi F, Bismuth H (2004) Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy: a model to predict long-term survival. Ann Surg 240:644–657 discussion 657-648

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Capussotti L, Muratore A, Mulas MM, Massucco P, Aglietta M (2006) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for initially irresectable colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 93:1001–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah SA, Bromberg R, Coates A, Rempel E, Simunovic M, Gallinger S (2007) Survival after liver resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma in a large population. J Am Coll Surg 205:676–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gold JS, Are C, Kornprat P, Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Blumgart LH, D’Angelica M (2008) Increased use of parenchymal-sparing surgery for bilateral liver metastases from colorectal cancer is associated with improved mortality without change in oncologic outcome: trends in treatment over time in 440 patients. Ann Surg 247:109–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vigano L, Ferrero A, Sgotto E, Polastri R, Muratore A, Capussotti L (2005) Parenchyma sparing: evolution of the resective surgical approach of hepatic metastasis from the colorectum. I supplementi di Tumori 4:S35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Postriganova N, Kazaryan AM, Røsok BI, Fretland AA, Barkhatov L, Edwin B (2014) Margin status after laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases: does a narrow resection margin have an influence on survival and local recurrence? HPB 16(9):822–829

  16. Montalti R, Berardi G, Laurent S, Sebastiani S, Ferdinande L, Libbrecht LJ, Smeets P, Brescia A, Rogiers X, de Hemptinne B, Geboes K, Troisi RI (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection compared to open approach in patients with colorectal liver metastases improves further resectability: Oncological outcomes of a case–control matched-pairs analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 40(5):536–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection: 2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ueda K, Turner P, Gagner M (2004) Stress response to laparoscopic liver resection. HPB 6:247–252

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cady B, Jenkins RL, Steele GD Jr, Lewis WD, Stone MD, McDermott WV, Jessup JM, Bothe A, Lalor P, Lovett EJ, Lavin P, Linehan DC (1998) Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome. Ann Surg 227:566–571

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ekberg H, Tranberg KG, Andersson R, Lundstedt C, Hagerstrand I, Ranstam J, Bengmark S (1986) Determinants of survival in liver resection for colorectal secondaries. Br J Surg 73:727–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nordlinger B, Guiguet M, Vaillant JC, Balladur P, Boudjema K, Bachellier P, Jaeck D (1996) Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver. A prognostic scoring system to improve case selection, based on 1568 patients. Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Cancer 77:1254–1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shirabe K, Takenaka K, Gion T, Fujiwara Y, Shimada M, Yanaga K, Maeda T, Kajiyama K, Sugimachi K (1997) Analysis of prognostic risk factors in hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma with special reference to the surgical margin. Br J Surg 84:1077–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Elias D, Cavalcanti A, Sabourin JC, Pignon JP, Ducreux M, Lasser P (1998) Results of 136 curative hepatectomies with a safety margin of less than 10 mm for colorectal metastases. J Surg Oncol 69:88–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhir M, Lyden ER, Wang A, Smith LM, Ullrich F, Are C (2011) Influence of margins on overall survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 254:234–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Altendorf-Hofmann A, Scheele J (2003) A critical review of the major indicators of prognosis after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 12:165–192 xi

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Figueras J, Burdio F, Ramos E, Torras J, Llado L, Lopez-Ben S, Codina-Barreras A, Mojal S (2007) Effect of subcentimeter nonpositive resection margin on hepatic recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Evidences from 663 liver resections. Ann Oncol 18:1190–1195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Ardito F, Vellone M, Giovannini I, Federico B, Vecchio FM (2008) Influence of surgical margin on type of recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases: a single-center experience. Surgery 143:384–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bodingbauer M, Tamandl D, Schmid K, Plank C, Schima W, Gruenberger T (2007) Size of surgical margin does not influence recurrence rates after curative liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Br J Surg 94:1133–1138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, Flores E, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Adam R (2008) R1 resection by necessity for colorectal liver metastases: is it still a contraindication to surgery? Ann Surg 248:626–637

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Strasberg SM (1997) Terminology of liver anatomy and liver resections: coming to grips with hepatic Babel. J Am Coll Surg 184:413–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schultz NA, Larsen PN, Klarskov B, Plum LM, Frederiksen HJ, Christensen BM, Kehlet H, Hillingso JG (2013) Evaluation of a fast-track programme for patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 100:138–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Troisi RI, Montalti R, Van Limmen JG, Cavaniglia D, Reyntjens K, Rogiers X, De Hemptinne B (2013) Risk factors and management of conversions to an open approach in laparoscopic liver resection: analysis of 265 consecutive cases. HPB 16(1):75–82

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanley JA (1989) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 29:307–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lam VW, Laurence JM, Pang T, Johnston E, Hollands MJ, Pleass HC, Richardson AJ (2014) A systematic review of a liver-first approach in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases. HPB 16:101–108

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. von Heesen M, Schuld J, Sperling J, Grunhage F, Lammert F, Richter S, Schilling MK, Kollmar O (2012) Parenchyma-preserving hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 397:383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Andreou A, Aloia TA, Brouquet A, Dickson PV, Zimmitti G, Maru DM, Kopetz S, Loyer EM, Curley SA, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN (2013) Margin status remains an important determinant of survival after surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases in the era of modern chemotherapy. Ann Surg 257:1079–1088

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hamady ZZ, Lodge JP, Welsh FK, Toogood GJ, White A, John T, Rees M (2013) One-millimeter cancer-free margin is curative for colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score case-match approach. Ann Surg 259(3):543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Konopke R, Kersting S, Makowiec F, Gassmann P, Kuhlisch E, Senninger N, Hopt U, Saeger HD (2008) Resection of colorectal liver metastases: is a resection margin of 3 mm enough? a multicenter analysis of the GAST Study Group. World J Surg 32:2047–2056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vandeweyer D, Neo EL, Chen JW, Maddern GJ, Wilson TG, Padbury RT (2009) Influence of resection margin on survival in hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases. HPB 11:499–504

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Holdhoff M, Schmidt K, Diehl F, Aggrawal N, Angenendt P, Romans K, Edelstein DL, Torbenson M, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Choti MA, Diaz LA Jr (2011) Detection of tumor DNA at the margins of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 17:3551–3557

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sh J, Muirhead W, Zaitoun AM, Cameron IC, Lobo DN (2012) Comparison of liver parenchymal ablation and tissue necrosis in a cadaveric bovine model using the Harmonic Scalpel, the LigaSure, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator and the Aquamantys devices. HPB 14:828–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ayez N, Lalmahomed ZS, Eggermont AM, Ijzermans JN, de Jonge J, van Montfort K, Verhoef C (2012) Outcome of microscopic incomplete resection (R1) of colorectal liver metastases in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1618–1627

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Aggarwal C, Meropol NJ, Punt CJ, Iannotti N, Saidman BH, Sabbath KD, Gabrail NY, Picus J, Morse MA, Mitchell E, Miller MC, Cohen SJ (2013) Relationship among circulating tumor cells, CEA and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 24:420–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Edwin B, Nordin A, Kazaryan AM (2011) Laparoscopic liver surgery: new frontiers. Scand J Surg 100:54–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pawlik TM, Vauthey JN (2008) Surgical margins during hepatic surgery for colorectal liver metastases: complete resection not millimeters defines outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 15:677–679

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Roberto Montalti, Federico Tomassini, Stéphanie Laurent, Peter Smeets, Marc De Man, Karen Geboes, Louis J. Libbrecht, and Roberto I. Troisi declared that they have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto I. Troisi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montalti, R., Tomassini, F., Laurent, S. et al. Impact of surgical margins on overall and recurrence-free survival in parenchymal-sparing laparoscopic liver resections of colorectal metastases. Surg Endosc 29, 2736–2747 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3999-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3999-3

Keywords

Navigation