Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Renewed assessment of the stapled anastomosis with the increasing role of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Stapled gastrointestinal anastomosis has gained wide adoption among the surgical community for its ease, speed, and its applicability in laparoscopic surgery. Over the last decade, with the increase in laparoscopic techniques in colon surgery, anastomotic stapling has become the technique of choice for colon cancer surgery at our center. This abstract assesses whether the increasing adoption of anastomotic stapling affected the rate of anastomotic leaks and duration of surgery.

Methods

All patients surgically treated for colon cancer with a primary bowel anastomosis from 2004 through 2011 were included (n = 998). Duration of stay, surgery, and postoperative complication rates was compared between hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis.

Results

The number of stapled anastomoses grew significantly from 45.8 % in 2004–2007 to 80.3 % in 2008–2011 (p < 0.001), and an increasing portion of those is performed in laparoscopic procedures (29.8 to 43.3 %; p = 0.01). Surgeries using stapled anastomosis initially took longer, but a decreasing trend (2004–2007: 147.5 min to 2007–2011: 124 min; p < 0.001) along with an increasing duration in hand-sewn surgeries (94–118.5 min; p < 0.01) meant stapled procedures became shorter than hand-sewn procedures by 2009. Complication rates did not differ significantly between groups, with stapled anastomoses having lower percentages of anastomotic leaks (1.6 vs. 2.4 %; p = 0.38). By the second half of our research period, the median admission for patients with stapled anastomoses was two days shorter (4 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001), independently of the chosen approach.

Conclusion

Stapled anastomoses did not increase anastomotic leak rates. If anything, leak rates appeared slightly lower. In addition, stapled anastomoses significantly shortened operation duration. With the benefit of being a tool that facilitates minimally invasive surgery, it is a safe way to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and promote faster and better recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goulder F (2012) Bowel anastomoses: The theory, the practice and the evidence base. World J Gastrointest Surg 4(9):208–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2013) Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg 148(2):190–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fingerhut A, Elhadad A, Hay JM, Lacaine F, Flamant Y (1994) Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 116(3):484–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MacRae HM, McLeod RS (1998) Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 41(2):180–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC, Brunton FJ (1985) Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 72(8):603–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Neutzling CB, Lustosa SAS, Proenca IM, da Silva EMK, Matos D (2012) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2:003144

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reid JD, Robins RE, Atkinson KG (1984) Pelvic recurrence after anterior resection and EEA stapling anastomosis for potentially curable carcinoma of the rectum. Am J Surg 147(5):629–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bisgaard C, Svanholm H, Jensen AS (1986) Recurrent carcinoma after low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA staple gun. Acta Chir Scand. 152:157–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Akyol AM, McGregor JR, Galloway DJ, Murray G, George WD (1991) Recurrence of colorectal cancer after sutured and stapled large bowel anastomoses. Br J Surg 78(11):1297–1300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ (1995) Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg 221(2):176–184

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award 8UL1TR000170-05 and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers, or the National Institutes of Health.) This work was also supported by the Dutch Cancer Society, the Dutch Digestive Society, the Amsterdam University Funds, and the Fulbright Foundation. (all funding: RA)

Disclosures

Amri, Bordeianou, Sylla, and Berger have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Berger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amri, R., Bordeianou, L.G., Sylla, P. et al. Renewed assessment of the stapled anastomosis with the increasing role of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 29, 2675–2682 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3989-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3989-5

Keywords

Navigation