Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 1400–1405 | Cite as

Multi-layered intra-abdominal adhesion prophylaxis following laparoscopic colorectal surgery

  • Atsushi TsurutaEmail author
  • Tadashi Itoh
  • Toshihiro Hirai
  • Masafumi Nakamura



Small bowel obstruction secondary to intra-abdominal adhesions is a frequent postoperative complication. Less invasive surgery carries a lower risk of postoperative adhesions, but adhesions may still occur after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We present here some of our methods of adhesion prophylaxis for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.


The 167 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery at our center from 2007 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. To prevent postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions, anti-adhesion barriers were placed using the half-overlap method. The rate of postoperative small bowel obstruction was compared among three groups: patients who received no adhesion prophylaxis (Group NP), patients who received single-layered adhesion prophylaxis adjacent to the incision (Group SP), and patients who received three layers of adhesion prophylaxis at different depths (Group MLP).


The rate of postoperative ileus was significantly different among the three groups, at 9.7 % (6/62) in Group NP, 5.0 % (1/19) in Group SP, and 0 % (0/86) in Group MLP).


This retrospective analysis found that placement of multi-layered anti-adhesion barriers using the half-overlap method provided the most effective prophylaxis. Prospective clinical trials are needed to further evaluate these methods of anti-adhesion prophylaxis.


Laparoscopic colorectal surgery Postoperative adhesion Seprafilm Small bowel obstruction 



No financial support was received for this study.


Atsushi Tsuruta, Tadashi Itoh, Toshihiro Hirai, and Masafumi Nakamura have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Menzie D, Ellis H (1990) Intestinal obstruction from adhesions-how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:60–63Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, Wolff BG, Roberts PL, Smith LE, Sweeney SA, Moore M (1996) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by A sodium hyaluronate, double-blinded multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183:297–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:177–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sonoda T, Pandey S, Trencheva K, Lee S, Milsom J (2009) Longterm complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 208:62–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ouaïssi M, Gaujoux S, Veyrie N, Denève E, Brigand C, Castel B, Duron JJ, Rault A, Slim K, Nocca D (2012) Post-operative adhesions after digestive surgery: Their incidence and prevention: review of the literature. J Visc Surg 149:e104–e114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shinohara T, Kashiwagi H, Yanagisawa S, Yanaga K (2008) A simple and novel technique for the placement of antiadhesive membrane in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:188–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chuang YC, Fan CN, Cho FN, Kan YY, Chang YH, Kang HY (2008) A novel technique to apply a Seprafilm (hyaluronate–carboxymethylcellulose) barrier following laparoscopic surgeries. Fertil Steril 90:1959–1963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kinoshita K (2006) A novel instrument and technique for using Seprafilm hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose membrane during laparoscopic myomectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 16:497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ortiz MV, Awad ZT (2009) An easy technique for laparoscopic placement of Seprafilm. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:e181–e183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fenton BW, Fanning J (2008) Laparoscopic application of hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose slurry: an adhesion barrier in a slurry formulation goes where the available sheets cannot. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fossum GT, Silverberg KM, Miller CE, Diamond MP, Holmdahl L (2011) Gynecologic use of Sepraspray adhesion barrier for reduction of adhesion development after laparoscopic myomectomy: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 96:487–491VrGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsuruta A, Ikeda H, Okabe M, Itoh T (2012) Prevention of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Operation 66:599–603 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vrijland W, Tseng L, Eijkman H, Hop W, Jakimowicz J, Leguit P, Stassen L, Swank D, Haverlag R, Bonjer J, Jeekel H (2002) Fewer intraperitoneal adhesions with use of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose membrane. Ann Surg 235:193–199CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheldon HK, Gainsbury ML, Cassidy MR, Chu DI, Stucchi AF, Becker JM (2012) A sprayable hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier exhibits regional adhesion reduction efficacy and does not impair intestinal healing. J Gastrointest Surg 16:325–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atsushi Tsuruta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tadashi Itoh
    • 2
  • Toshihiro Hirai
    • 1
  • Masafumi Nakamura
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Digestive SurgeryKawasaki Medical SchoolKurashikiJapan
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryKurashiki Central HospitalKurashikiJapan

Personalised recommendations